Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 25056310 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Functional gene groups are concentrated within chromosomes, among chromosomes and in the nuclear space of the human genome.

Nucleic acids research ·Vol. 42 ·No. 15 ·2014-09-00 ·Pages 9854-61

Thévenin A, Ein-Dor L, Ozery-Flato M, Shamir R

Abstract

Genomes undergo changes in organization as a result of gene duplications, chromosomal rearrangements and local mutations, among other mechanisms. In contrast to prokaryotes, in which genes of a common function are often organized in operons and reside contiguously along the genome, most eukaryotes show much weaker clustering of genes by function, except for few concrete functional groups. We set out to check systematically if there is a relation between gene function and gene organization in the human genome. We test this question for three types of functional groups: pairs of interacting proteins, complexes and pathways. We find a significant concentration of functional groups both in terms of their distance within the same chromosome and in terms of their dispersal over several chromosomes. Moreover, using Hi-C contact map of the tendency of chromosomal segments to appear close in the 3D space of the nucleus, we show that members of the same functional group that reside on distinct chromosomes tend to co-localize in space. The result holds for all three types of functional groups that we tested. Hence, the human genome shows substantial concentration of functional groups within chromosomes and across chromosomes in space.

MeSH Terms
Cell Nucleus/genetics Chromosomes, Human Genes Genome, Human Humans Intranuclear Space Protein Interaction Mapping
Authors & Affiliations
4 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Thévenin Annelyse
Genome Informatics, Faculty of Technology and Institute for Bioinformatics, Center for Biotechnology (CeBiTec), Bielefeld University, Bielefeld 33615, Germany IBM Research-Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa 3498825, Israel.
Ein-Dor Liat
Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.
Ozery-Flato Michal
Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.
Shamir Ron
IBM Research-Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa 3498825, Israel rshamir@tau.ac.il.
References (44)
44 references, click to expand
  1. Annotation of the Drosophila melanogaster euchromatic genome: a systematic review.
    Genome Biol. 2002;3(12):RESEARCH0083 PMID: 12537572
  2. Mapping of long-range associations throughout the fission yeast genome reveals global genome organization linked to transcriptional regulation.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Dec;38(22):8164-77 PMID: 21030438
  3. A global analysis of Caenorhabditis elegans operons.
    Nature. 2002 Jun 20;417(6891):851-4 PMID: 12075352
  4. The IntAct molecular interaction database in 2010.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Jan;38(Database issue):D525-31 PMID: 19850723
  5. Nuclear speckles.
    Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011 Feb 01;3(2): PMID: 20926517
  6. Global signatures of protein and mRNA expression levels.
    Mol Biosyst. 2009 Dec;5(12):1512-26 PMID: 20023718
  7. Spatial organization of gene expression: the active chromatin hub.
    Chromosome Res. 2003;11(5):447-59 PMID: 12971721
  8. Clusters of co-expressed genes in mammalian genomes are conserved by natural selection.
    Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Mar;22(3):767-75 PMID: 15574806
  9. Coordinated expression domains in mammalian genomes.
    PLoS One. 2010 Aug 18;5(8):e12158 PMID: 20805879
  10. Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure.
    Nature. 2013 Oct 3;502(7469):59-64 PMID: 24067610
  11. Chromosomal organization is shaped by the transcription regulatory network.
    Trends Genet. 2005 Mar;21(3):138-42 PMID: 15734572
  12. Chromosomal contact permits transcription between coregulated genes.
    Cell. 2013 Oct 24;155(3):606-20 PMID: 24243018
  13. Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome.
    Cell. 2012 Feb 3;148(3):458-72 PMID: 22265598
  14. Preferential associations between co-regulated genes reveal a transcriptional interactome in erythroid cells.
    Nat Genet. 2010 Jan;42(1):53-61 PMID: 20010836
  15. On emerging nuclear order.
    J Cell Biol. 2011 Mar 7;192(5):711-21 PMID: 21383074
  16. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome.
    Science. 2009 Oct 9;326(5950):289-93 PMID: 19815776
  17. CORUM: the comprehensive resource of mammalian protein complexes--2009.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Jan;38(Database issue):D497-501 PMID: 19884131
  18. Genes encoding subunits of stable complexes are clustered on the yeast chromosomes: an interpretation from a dosage balance perspective.
    Genetics. 2004 Aug;167(4):2121-5 PMID: 15342545
  19. Fluorescent labeling of nascent RNA reveals transcription by RNA polymerase II in domains scattered throughout the nucleus.
    J Cell Biol. 1993 Jul;122(2):283-93 PMID: 8320255
  20. Transcription factories: gene expression in unions?
    Nat Rev Genet. 2009 Jul;10(7):457-66 PMID: 19506577
  21. Probabilistic modeling of Hi-C contact maps eliminates systematic biases to characterize global chromosomal architecture.
    Nat Genet. 2011 Oct 16;43(11):1059-65 PMID: 22001755
  22. The evolutionary dynamics of eukaryotic gene order.
    Nat Rev Genet. 2004 Apr;5(4):299-310 PMID: 15131653
  23. The 3D organization of the yeast genome correlates with co-expression and reflects functional relations between genes.
    PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54699 PMID: 23382942
  24. Clustering of housekeeping genes provides a unified model of gene order in the human genome.
    Nat Genet. 2002 Jun;31(2):180-3 PMID: 11992122
  25. Neighboring genes show interchromosomal colocalization after their separation.
    Mol Biol Evol. 2014 May;31(5):1166-72 PMID: 24505120
  26. Characterization of genome-wide enhancer-promoter interactions reveals co-expression of interacting genes and modes of higher order chromatin organization.
    Cell Res. 2012 Mar;22(3):490-503 PMID: 22270183
  27. A three-dimensional model of the yeast genome.
    Nature. 2010 May 20;465(7296):363-7 PMID: 20436457
  28. Transcriptional coupling of neighboring genes and gene expression noise: evidence that gene orientation and noncoding transcripts are modulators of noise.
    Genome Biol Evol. 2011;3:320-31 PMID: 21402863
  29. Close 3D proximity of evolutionary breakpoints argues for the notion of spatial synteny.
    BMC Genomics. 2011 Jun 10;12:303 PMID: 21663614
  30. Coexpression of neighboring genes in the genome of Arabidopsis thaliana.
    Genome Res. 2004 Jun;14(6):1060-7 PMID: 15173112
  31. Spatial localization of co-regulated genes exceeds genomic gene clustering in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Feb 1;41(4):2191-201 PMID: 23303780
  32. Is optimal gene order impossible?
    Trends Genet. 2006 Aug;22(8):420-3 PMID: 16806566
  33. Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins.
    J Mol Biol. 1961 Jun;3:318-56 PMID: 13718526
  34. Transcriptional regulation constrains the organization of genes on eukaryotic chromosomes.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Oct 14;105(41):15761-6 PMID: 18840678
  35. Extensive promoter-centered chromatin interactions provide a topological basis for transcription regulation.
    Cell. 2012 Jan 20;148(1-2):84-98 PMID: 22265404
  36. Chromatin connectivity maps reveal dynamic promoter-enhancer long-range associations.
    Nature. 2013 Dec 12;504(7479):306-310 PMID: 24213634
  37. Visualization of focal sites of transcription within human nuclei.
    EMBO J. 1993 Mar;12(3):1059-65 PMID: 8458323
  38. Active RNA polymerases are localized within discrete transcription "factories' in human nuclei.
    J Cell Sci. 1996 Jun;109 ( Pt 6):1427-36 PMID: 8799830
  39. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jan 1;28(1):27-30 PMID: 10592173
  40. Capturing chromosome conformation.
    Science. 2002 Feb 15;295(5558):1306-11 PMID: 11847345
  41. Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control.
    Nature. 2011 May 19;473(7347):337-42 PMID: 21593866
  42. Genomic determination of the glucocorticoid response reveals unexpected mechanisms of gene regulation.
    Genome Res. 2009 Dec;19(12):2163-71 PMID: 19801529
  43. Co-expressed genes prepositioned in spatial neighborhoods stochastically associate with SC35 speckles and RNA polymerase II factories.
    Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014 May;71(9):1741-59 PMID: 24026398
  44. The human transcriptome map: clustering of highly expressed genes in chromosomal domains.
    Science. 2001 Feb 16;291(5507):1289-92 PMID: 11181992
Article Info
Journal
Nucleic acids research
Abbr.
Nucleic Acids Res
ISSN
1362-4962
Published
2014-09-00
Epub
2014-00-23
Pages
9854-61
Language
English
Region
England
NLM ID
0411011
PMCID
PMC4150778
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com