Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 21886785 Published · ppublish English Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Comparative analysis of bacterial communities in a potato field as determined by pyrosequencing.

PloS one ·Vol. 6 ·No. 8 ·2011-00-00 ·Pages e23321

Inceoğlu Ö, Al-Soud WA, Salles JF, Semenov AV, van Elsas JD

Abstract

Plants selectively attract particular soil microorganisms, in particular consumers of root-excreted compounds. It is unclear to what extent cultivar type and/or growth stage affect this process. DNA-based pyrosequencing was used to characterize the structure of bacterial communities in a field cropped with potato. The rhizospheres of six cultivars denoted Aveka, Aventra, Karnico, Modena, Premiere and Desiree, at three growth stages (young, flowering and senescence) were examined, in addition to corresponding bulk soils. Around 350,000 sequences were obtained (5,700 to 38,000 per sample). Across all samples, rank abundance distributions best fitted the power law model, which indicates a community composed of a few highly dominant species next to numerous rare species. Grouping of the sequences showed that members of the Actinobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, next to as-yet-unclassified bacteria, dominated. Other groups that were consistently found, albeit at lower abundance, were Beta-, Gamma- and Deltaproteobacteria and Acidobacteria. Principal components analyses revealed that rhizosphere samples were significantly different from corresponding bulk soil in each growth stage. Furthermore, cultivar effects were found in the young plant stage, whereas these became insignificant in the flowering and senescence stages. Besides, an effect of time of season was observed for both rhizosphere and bulk soils. The analyzed rhizosphere samples of the potato cultivars were grouped into two groups, in accordance with the allocation of carbon to starch in their tubers, i.e. Aveka, Aventra and Karnico (high) versus Premiere and Desiree (low) and thus replicates per group were established. Across all potato cultivars, the young plant stages revealed cultivar-dependent bacterial community structures, which disappeared in the flowering and senescence stages. Furthermore, Pseudomonas, Beta-, Alpha- and Deltaproteobacteria flourished under different ecological conditions than the Acidobacteria.

MeSH Terms
Agriculture Bacteria/classification,genetics Cluster Analysis Flowers/physiology Principal Component Analysis RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics Rhizosphere Seasons Sequence Analysis, DNA/methods Soil Microbiology Solanum tuberosum/growth & development,microbiology Temperature
Chemicals
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
Authors & Affiliations
5 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Inceoğlu Özgül
Department of Microbial Ecology, Centre for Life Sciences, Nijenborgh 7, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Al-Soud Waleed Abu
Salles Joana Falcão
Semenov Alexander V
van Elsas Jan Dirk
References (37)
37 references, click to expand
  1. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities.
    Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Dec;75(23):7537-41 PMID: 19801464
  2. Effect of above-ground plant species on soil microbial community structure and its impact on suppression of Rhizoctonia solani AG3.
    Environ Microbiol. 2006 Feb;8(2):233-46 PMID: 16423012
  3. Application of a novel Paenibacillus-specific PCR-DGGE method and sequence analysis to assess the diversity of Paenibacillus spp. in the maize rhizosphere.
    J Microbiol Methods. 2003 Aug;54(2):213-31 PMID: 12782377
  4. A comprehensive survey of soil acidobacterial diversity using pyrosequencing and clone library analyses.
    ISME J. 2009 Apr;3(4):442-53 PMID: 19129864
  5. Accuracy and quality of massively parallel DNA pyrosequencing.
    Genome Biol. 2007;8(7):R143 PMID: 17659080
  6. Effects of experimental choices and analysis noise on surveys of the "rare biosphere".
    Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 May;75(10):3263-70 PMID: 19270149
  7. Exploration of hitherto-uncultured bacteria from the rhizosphere.
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2009 Sep;69(3):313-28 PMID: 19508698
  8. Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria.
    Ecology. 2007 Jun;88(6):1354-64 PMID: 17601128
  9. Bulk and rhizosphere soil bacterial communities studied by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis: plant-dependent enrichment and seasonal shifts revealed.
    Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Oct;67(10):4742-51 PMID: 11571180
  10. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences.
    J Mol Evol. 1980 Dec;16(2):111-20 PMID: 7463489
  11. Evidence from GC-TRFLP that bacterial communities in soil are lognormally distributed.
    PLoS One. 2008 Aug 06;3(8):e2910 PMID: 18682841
  12. Phylogenetic diversity of Acidobacteria in a former agricultural soil.
    ISME J. 2009 Mar;3(3):378-82 PMID: 19020558
  13. Real-time PCR detection of Holophagae (Acidobacteria) and Verrucomicrobia subdivision 1 groups in bulk and leek (Allium porrum) rhizosphere soils.
    J Microbiol Methods. 2010 Nov;83(2):141-8 PMID: 20801169
  14. Computational improvements reveal great bacterial diversity and high metal toxicity in soil.
    Science. 2005 Aug 26;309(5739):1387-90 PMID: 16123304
  15. Temporal scaling of bacterial taxa is influenced by both stochastic and deterministic ecological factors.
    Environ Microbiol. 2008 Jun;10(6):1411-8 PMID: 18205822
  16. Identifying the dominant soil bacterial taxa in libraries of 16S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes.
    Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Mar;72(3):1719-28 PMID: 16517615
  17. Effect of agricultural management regime on Burkholderia community structure in soil.
    Microb Ecol. 2006 Aug;52(2):267-79 PMID: 16897309
  18. A taxa-area relationship for bacteria.
    Nature. 2004 Dec 9;432(7018):750-3 PMID: 15592412
  19. High diversity in DNA of soil bacteria.
    Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 Mar;56(3):782-7 PMID: 2317046
  20. Wide distribution and diversity of members of the bacterial kingdom Acidobacterium in the environment.
    Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Apr;65(4):1731-7 PMID: 10103274
  21. Effects of plant genotype and growth stage on the structure of bacterial communities associated with potato (Solanum tuberosum L.).
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2008 May;64(2):283-96 PMID: 18355298
  22. Empirical and theoretical bacterial diversity in four Arizona soils.
    Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Jun;68(6):3035-45 PMID: 12039765
  23. Polymerase chain reaction primers miss half of rRNA microbial diversity.
    ISME J. 2009 Dec;3(12):1365-73 PMID: 19693101
  24. The role of ecological theory in microbial ecology.
    Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007 May;5(5):384-92 PMID: 17435792
  25. Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework.
    Ecol Lett. 2007 Oct;10(10):995-1015 PMID: 17845298
  26. Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA.
    Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Mar;59(3):695-700 PMID: 7683183
  27. A transformation method for obtaining marker-free plants of a cross-pollinating and vegetatively propagated crop.
    Nat Biotechnol. 2003 Apr;21(4):439-42 PMID: 12627169
  28. Analysis of the dynamics of bacterial communities in the rhizosphere of the chrysanthemum via denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and substrate utilization patterns
    Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Dec;64(12):4950-7 PMID: 9835588
  29. Pyrosequencing reveals a highly diverse and cultivar-specific bacterial endophyte community in potato roots.
    Microb Ecol. 2010 Jul;60(1):157-66 PMID: 20414647
  30. Accurate taxonomy assignments from 16S rRNA sequences produced by highly parallel pyrosequencers.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Oct;36(18):e120 PMID: 18723574
  31. Pyrosequencing enumerates and contrasts soil microbial diversity.
    ISME J. 2007 Aug;1(4):283-90 PMID: 18043639
  32. Effects of transgenic fructan-producing potatoes on the community structure of rhizosphere and phyllosphere bacteria.
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2008 Nov;66(2):411-25 PMID: 18662310
  33. Diversity and seasonal fluctuations of the dominant members of the bacterial soil community in a wheat field as determined by cultivation and molecular methods.
    Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 May;67(5):2284-91 PMID: 11319113
  34. Microbial diversity in soil: selection microbial populations by plant and soil type and implications for disease suppressiveness.
    Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2004;42:243-70 PMID: 15283667
  35. Effects of plant genotype and growth stage on the betaproteobacterial communities associated with different potato cultivars in two fields.
    Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Jun;76(11):3675-84 PMID: 20363788
  36. The ribosomal database project (RDP-II): introducing myRDP space and quality controlled public data.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jan;35(Database issue):D169-72 PMID: 17090583
  37. Group-specific primer and probe sets to detect methanogenic communities using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction.
    Biotechnol Bioeng. 2005 Mar 20;89(6):670-9 PMID: 15696537
Article Info
Journal
PloS one
Abbr.
PLoS One
ISSN
1932-6203
Published
2011-00-00
Epub
2011-00-19
Pages
e23321
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
101285081
PMCID
PMC3158761
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com