Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 24777111 Published · epublish English Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

US incidence of breast cancer subtypes defined by joint hormone receptor and HER2 status.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute ·Vol. 106 ·No. 5 ·2014-04-28

Howlader N, Altekruse SF, Li CI, Chen VW, Clarke CA, Ries LA, Cronin KA

Abstract

In 2010, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries began collecting human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) receptor status for breast cancer cases. Breast cancer subtypes defined by joint hormone receptor (HR; estrogen receptor [ER] and progesterone receptor [PR]) and HER2 status were assessed across the 28% of the US population that is covered by SEER registries. Age-specific incidence rates by subtype were calculated for non-Hispanic (NH) white, NH black, NH Asian Pacific Islander (API), and Hispanic women. Joint HR/HER2 status distributions by age, race/ethnicity, county-level poverty, registry, stage, Bloom-Richardson grade, tumor size, and nodal status were evaluated using multivariable adjusted polytomous logistic regression. All statistical tests were two-sided. Among case patients with known HR/HER2 status, 36810 (72.7%) were found to be HR(+)/HER2(-), 6193 (12.2%) were triple-negative (HR(-)/HER2(-)), 5240 (10.3%) were HR(+)/HER2(+), and 2328 (4.6%) were HR(-)/HER2(+); 6912 (12%) had unknown HR/HER2 status. NH white women had the highest incidence rate of the HR(+)/HER2(-) subtype, and NH black women had the highest rate of the triple-negative subtype. Compared with women with the HR(+)/HER2(-) subtype, triple-negative patients were more likely to be NH black and Hispanic; HR(+)/HER2(+) patients were more likely to be NH API; and HR(-)/HER2(+) patients were more likely to be NH black, NH API, and Hispanic. Patients with triple-negative, HR(+)/HER2(+), and HR(-)/HER2(+) breast cancer were 10% to 30% less likely to be diagnosed at older ages compared with HR(+)/HER2(-) patients and 6.4-fold to 20.0-fold more likely to present with high-grade disease. In the future, SEER data can be used to monitor clinical outcomes in women diagnosed with different molecular subtypes of breast cancer for a large portion (approximately 28%) of the US population.

MeSH Terms
Aged Blacks Breast Neoplasms/classification,epidemiology,ethnology,metabolism Female Humans Incidence Middle Aged Receptor, ErbB-2/biosynthesis Receptors, Estrogen/biosynthesis Receptors, Progesterone/biosynthesis Registries SEER Program Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/classification,epidemiology,ethnology,metabolism United States/epidemiology Whites
Chemicals
Receptors, Estrogen Receptors, Progesterone ERBB2 protein, human Receptor, ErbB-2
Authors & Affiliations
7 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Howlader Nadia
Affiliations of authors: Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda MD (NH, SFA, LAGR, KAC); Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (CIL); Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (CIL); Louisiana Tumor Registry and Epidemiology Program, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA (VWC); Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, CA (CAC); National Cancer Institute Contractor, RiesSearch, LLC, Rockville MD (LAGR). howladern@mail.nih.gov.
Altekruse Sean F
Affiliations of authors: Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda MD (NH, SFA, LAGR, KAC); Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (CIL); Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (CIL); Louisiana Tumor Registry and Epidemiology Program, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA (VWC); Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, CA (CAC); National Cancer Institute Contractor, RiesSearch, LLC, Rockville MD (LAGR).
Li Christopher I
Affiliations of authors: Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda MD (NH, SFA, LAGR, KAC); Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (CIL); Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (CIL); Louisiana Tumor Registry and Epidemiology Program, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA (VWC); Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, CA (CAC); National Cancer Institute Contractor, RiesSearch, LLC, Rockville MD (LAGR).
Chen Vivien W
Affiliations of authors: Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda MD (NH, SFA, LAGR, KAC); Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (CIL); Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (CIL); Louisiana Tumor Registry and Epidemiology Program, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA (VWC); Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, CA (CAC); National Cancer Institute Contractor, RiesSearch, LLC, Rockville MD (LAGR).
Clarke Christina A
Affiliations of authors: Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda MD (NH, SFA, LAGR, KAC); Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (CIL); Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (CIL); Louisiana Tumor Registry and Epidemiology Program, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA (VWC); Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, CA (CAC); National Cancer Institute Contractor, RiesSearch, LLC, Rockville MD (LAGR).
Ries Lynn A G
Affiliations of authors: Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda MD (NH, SFA, LAGR, KAC); Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (CIL); Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (CIL); Louisiana Tumor Registry and Epidemiology Program, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA (VWC); Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, CA (CAC); National Cancer Institute Contractor, RiesSearch, LLC, Rockville MD (LAGR).
Cronin Kathleen A
Affiliations of authors: Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda MD (NH, SFA, LAGR, KAC); Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (CIL); Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (CIL); Louisiana Tumor Registry and Epidemiology Program, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA (VWC); Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, CA (CAC); National Cancer Institute Contractor, RiesSearch, LLC, Rockville MD (LAGR).
References (28)
28 references, click to expand
  1. Population-based estimate of the prevalence of HER-2 positive breast cancer tumors for early stage patients in the US.
    Cancer Invest. 2010 Nov;28(9):963-8 PMID: 20690807
  2. Breast tumor characteristics as predictors of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers.
    J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999 Dec 1;91(23):2020-8 PMID: 10580027
  3. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.
    Nature. 2000 Aug 17;406(6797):747-52 PMID: 10963602
  4. Incidence of breast cancer in the United States: current and future trends.
    J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Sep 21;103(18):1397-402 PMID: 21753181
  5. Impact of breast cancer subtypes and treatment on survival: an analysis spanning two decades.
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Oct;21(10):1848-55 PMID: 22989461
  6. Clinicopathologic features, patterns of recurrence, and survival among women with triple-negative breast cancer in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.
    Cancer. 2012 Nov 15;118(22):5463-72 PMID: 22544643
  7. Age-specific incidence of breast cancer subtypes: understanding the black-white crossover.
    J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Jul 18;104(14):1094-101 PMID: 22773826
  8. Triple-negative breast cancer: epidemiological considerations and recommendations.
    Ann Oncol. 2012 Aug;23 Suppl 6:vi7-12 PMID: 23012306
  9. Lessons from the neoadjuvant setting on how best to choose adjuvant therapies.
    Breast. 2011 Oct;20 Suppl 3:S142-5 PMID: 22015282
  10. Trends in breast cancer incidence and mortality in the United States: implications for prevention.
    Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Apr;138(3):665-73 PMID: 23546552
  11. Concordance among gene-expression-based predictors for breast cancer.
    N Engl J Med. 2006 Aug 10;355(6):560-9 PMID: 16899776
  12. Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 and estrogen receptor expression, a demonstration project using the residual tissue repository of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program.
    Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Jan;113(1):189-96 PMID: 18256926
  13. Occurrence of breast cancer subtypes in adolescent and young adult women.
    Breast Cancer Res. 2012 Mar 27;14(2):R55 PMID: 22452927
  14. Use of imputed population-based cancer registry data as a method of accounting for missing information: application to estrogen receptor status for breast cancer.
    Am J Epidemiol. 2012 Aug 15;176(4):347-56 PMID: 22842721
  15. Higher population-based incidence rates of triple-negative breast cancer among young African-American women : Implications for breast cancer screening recommendations.
    Cancer. 2011 Jun 15;117(12):2747-53 PMID: 21656753
  16. BRCA1/2 mutations and triple negative breast cancers.
    Breast Dis. 2010;32(1-2):25-33 PMID: 21778580
  17. Epidemiology of basal-like breast cancer.
    Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 May;109(1):123-39 PMID: 17578664
  18. The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes.
    Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Apr 15;13(8):2329-34 PMID: 17438091
  19. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer (unabridged version).
    Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010 Jul;134(7):e48-72 PMID: 20586616
  20. Lifetime risks of specific breast cancer subtypes among women in four racial/ethnic groups.
    Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12(6):R99 PMID: 21092082
  21. Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter?: the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project.
    Am J Epidemiol. 2002 Sep 1;156(5):471-82 PMID: 12196317
  22. Basal cell-like (triple-negative) breast cancer, a predictor of distant metastasis in African American women.
    Am J Surg. 2008 Feb;195(2):153-8 PMID: 18083134
  23. Prognostic significance of progesterone receptor-positive tumor cells within immunohistochemically defined luminal A breast cancer.
    J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jan 10;31(2):203-9 PMID: 23233704
  24. Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study.
    JAMA. 2006 Jun 7;295(21):2492-502 PMID: 16757721
  25. Breast cancer subtypes as defined by the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) among women with invasive breast cancer in California, 1999-2004.
    Breast J. 2009 Nov-Dec;15(6):593-602 PMID: 19764994
  26. Asian ethnicity and breast cancer subtypes: a study from the California Cancer Registry.
    Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Jun;127(2):471-8 PMID: 20957431
  27. Breast cancer subtypes based on ER/PR and Her2 expression: comparison of clinicopathologic features and survival.
    Clin Med Res. 2009 Jun;7(1-2):4-13 PMID: 19574486
  28. Efficient interval estimation for age-adjusted cancer rates.
    Stat Methods Med Res. 2006 Dec;15(6):547-69 PMID: 17260923
Article Info
Journal
Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Abbr.
J Natl Cancer Inst
ISSN
1460-2105
Published
2014-04-28
Epub
2014-00-28
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
7503089
PMCID
PMC4580552
Subset
IM
Corrections
CommentIn
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com