Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 21778580 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review

BRCA1/2 mutations and triple negative breast cancers.

Breast disease ·Vol. 32 ·No. 1-2 ·2010-00-00 ·Pages 25-33

Peshkin BN, Alabek ML, Isaacs C

Abstract

Identifying breast cancer patients at increased risk for carrying a mutation in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes is an important objective in clinical practice. Although age at diagnosis, family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer, and ethnicity are all essential parameters to consider when assessing risk, there are limitations as to how well such factors accurately predict BRCA1/2 status, even when quantitative risk models are applied. Integrating information about triple negative (TN) disease may help refine these estimates. Among newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, fewer than 10% have a mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes, and up to 20% present However, among BRCA1 mutation carriers at least one-third have TN breast cancers. In this paper, we review key studies that have assessed breast cancer cases with a known BRCA1/2 status and triple marker data. We also discuss how integrating such information into qualitative and quantitative risk assessments of BRCA1/2 carrier probability may improve the ability to identify women who are appropriate candidates for genetic testing. Identifying women at increased risk is critical as knowledge of mutation status may impact surgical and systemic treatment in newly diagnosed patients, as well as recommendations for ovarian cancer risk management.

MeSH Terms
Breast Neoplasms/genetics,metabolism Female Genes, BRCA1 Genes, BRCA2 Genetic Predisposition to Disease Genetic Testing Humans Pedigree Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism
Chemicals
Receptors, Estrogen Receptors, Progesterone Receptor, ErbB-2
Authors & Affiliations
3 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Peshkin Beth N
Fisher Center for Familial Cancer Research, Georgetown University, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC 20007-2401, USA. peshkinb@georgetown.edu
Alabek Michelle L
Isaacs Claudine
References (44)
44 references, click to expand
  1. Update on the Manchester Scoring System for BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing.
    J Med Genet. 2005 Jul;42(7):e39 PMID: 15994864
  2. BRCA mutations, molecular markers, and clinical variables in early-onset breast cancer: a population-based study.
    Breast. 2007 Jun;16(3):280-92 PMID: 17257844
  3. Incorporating tumour pathology information into breast cancer risk prediction algorithms.
    Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12(3):R28 PMID: 20482762
  4. Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality.
    JAMA. 2010 Sep 1;304(9):967-75 PMID: 20810374
  5. Triple-negative breast cancer--current status and future directions.
    Ann Oncol. 2009 Dec;20(12):1913-27 PMID: 19901010
  6. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 103: Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome.
    Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Apr;113(4):957-966 PMID: 19305347
  7. The pathology of familial breast cancer: predictive value of immunohistochemical markers estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER-2, and p53 in patients with mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2.
    J Clin Oncol. 2002 May 1;20(9):2310-8 PMID: 11981002
  8. Response to neoadjuvant therapy with cisplatin in BRCA1-positive breast cancer patients.
    Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 May;115(2):359-63 PMID: 18649131
  9. Limited family structure and BRCA gene mutation status in single cases of breast cancer.
    JAMA. 2007 Jun 20;297(23):2587-95 PMID: 17579227
  10. The prevalence of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in young women with breast cancer undergoing breast-conservation therapy.
    Am J Surg. 2006 Jul;192(1):58-62 PMID: 16769276
  11. Contralateral breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.
    J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 10;27(35):5887-92 PMID: 19858402
  12. Response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in women with BRCA1-positive breast cancers.
    Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 Mar;108(2):289-96 PMID: 17492376
  13. Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.
    Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Mar;62(3):676-89 PMID: 9497246
  14. Incorporating tumor immunohistochemical markers in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carrier prediction.
    Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10(2):401 PMID: 18466632
  15. Validity of models for predicting BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.
    Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 2;147(7):441-50 PMID: 17909205
  16. Pathological features and BRCA1 mutation screening in premenopausal breast cancer patients.
    Clin Cancer Res. 2001 Jun;7(6):1739-42 PMID: 11410514
  17. Pathologic complete response rates in young women with BRCA1-positive breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 20;28(3):375-9 PMID: 20008645
  18. Expanding the criteria for BRCA mutation testing in breast cancer survivors.
    J Clin Oncol. 2010 Sep 20;28(27):4214-20 PMID: 20733129
  19. A new scoring system for the chances of identifying a BRCA1/2 mutation outperforms existing models including BRCAPRO.
    J Med Genet. 2004 Jun;41(6):474-80 PMID: 15173236
  20. Breast cancer immunohistochemical features in young women with BRCA 1/2 mutations.
    Exp Oncol. 2009 Sep;31(3):174-8 PMID: 19877382
  21. The prevalence of BRCA1 mutations among young women with triple-negative breast cancer.
    BMC Cancer. 2009 Mar 19;9:86 PMID: 19298662
  22. Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 counseling and testing on newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.
    J Clin Oncol. 2004 May 15;22(10):1823-9 PMID: 15067026
  23. Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance.
    J Clin Oncol. 2007 Apr 10;25(11):1329-33 PMID: 17416853
  24. Major improvement in the efficacy of BRCA1 mutation screening using morphoclinical features of breast cancer.
    Cancer Res. 2000 Mar 1;60(5):1206-10 PMID: 10728676
  25. The prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in high-risk breast cancer patients of Chinese Han nationality: two recurrent mutations were identified.
    Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 Jul;110(1):99-109 PMID: 17851763
  26. Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and advanced breast cancer: a proof-of-concept trial.
    Lancet. 2010 Jul 24;376(9737):235-44 PMID: 20609467
  27. The contribution of breast cancer pathology to statistical models to predict mutation risk in BRCA carriers.
    Fam Cancer. 2010 Dec;9(4):545-53 PMID: 20577821
  28. Triple negative breast cancers: clinical and prognostic implications.
    Eur J Cancer. 2009 Sep;45 Suppl 1:27-40 PMID: 19775602
  29. Locoregional relapse and distant metastasis in conservatively managed triple negative early-stage breast cancer.
    J Clin Oncol. 2006 Dec 20;24(36):5652-7 PMID: 17116942
  30. Clinical and pathological characteristics of Chinese patients with BRCA related breast cancer.
    Hugo J. 2009 Dec;3(1-4):63-76 PMID: 20535403
  31. Addition of pathology and biomarker information significantly improves the performance of the Manchester scoring system for BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing.
    J Med Genet. 2009 Dec;46(12):811-7 PMID: 19542080
  32. Contribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germ-line mutations to the incidence of breast cancer in young women: results from a prospective population-based study in France.
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2005 Aug;43(4):404-13 PMID: 15887246
  33. Tamoxifen and contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers: an update.
    Int J Cancer. 2006 May 1;118(9):2281-4 PMID: 16331614
  34. Optimal selection of individuals for BRCA mutation testing: a comparison of available methods.
    J Clin Oncol. 2006 Feb 1;24(4):707-15 PMID: 16446345
  35. Predicting BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers: comparison of PENN II model to previous study.
    Fam Cancer. 2010 Dec;9(4):495-502 PMID: 20512419
  36. Iniparib, a PARP1 inhibitor for the potential treatment of cancer, including triple-negative breast cancer.
    IDrugs. 2010 Sep;13(9):646-56 PMID: 20799148
  37. Efficacy of neoadjuvant Cisplatin in triple-negative breast cancer.
    J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1145-53 PMID: 20100965
  38. Predicting the likelihood of carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation: validation of BOADICEA, BRCAPRO, IBIS, Myriad and the Manchester scoring system using data from UK genetics clinics.
    J Med Genet. 2008 Jul;45(7):425-31 PMID: 18413374
  39. Triple-negative breast cancer: distinguishing between basal and nonbasal subtypes.
    Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Apr 1;15(7):2302-10 PMID: 19318481
  40. Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: recommendation statement.
    Ann Intern Med. 2005 Sep 6;143(5):355-61 PMID: 16144894
  41. Clinical and pathologic characteristics of patients with BRCA-positive and BRCA-negative breast cancer.
    J Clin Oncol. 2008 Sep 10;26(26):4282-8 PMID: 18779615
  42. Clinical and pathologic differences between BRCA1-, BRCA2-, and non-BRCA-associated breast cancers in a multiracial developing country.
    World J Surg. 2009 Oct;33(10):2077-81 PMID: 19649760
  43. Histopathology of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast cancer.
    Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2006 Jul;59(1):27-39 PMID: 16530420
  44. Morphology of breast cancer as a means of triage of patients for BRCA1 genetic testing.
    Am J Surg Pathol. 2006 Nov;30(11):1357-66 PMID: 17063074
Article Info
Journal
Breast disease
Abbr.
Breast Dis
ISSN
1558-1551
Published
2010-00-00
Pages
25-33
Language
English
Region
Netherlands
NLM ID
8801277
PMCID
PMC3870050
Subset
IM
Grants
NCI NIH HHS · P30 CA051008 · United States
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com