Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 10580027 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Breast tumor characteristics as predictors of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute ·Vol. 91 ·No. 23 ·1999-12-01 ·Pages 2020-8

Porter PL, El-Bastawissi AY, Mandelson MT, Lin MG, Khalid N, Watney EA, Cousens L, White D, Taplin S, White E

Abstract

Although mammographic screening is useful for detecting early breast cancer, some tumors are detected in the interval between screening examinations. This study attempted to characterize fully the tumors detected in the two different manners. Our study utilized a case-control design and involved a cohort of women undergoing mammographic screening within the defined population of a health maintenance organization (the Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound). Women were classified as having "interval" or "interval-detected" cancers (n = 150) if their diagnosis was made within 24 months after a negative-screening mammogram or one that indicated a benign condition. Cancers were classified as "screen detected" (n = 279) if the diagnosis occurred after a positive assessment by screening mammography. Tumors from women in each group were evaluated for clinical presentation, histology, proliferative characteristics, and expression of hormone receptors, p53 tumor suppressor protein, and c-erbB-2 protein. Interval-detected cancers occurred more in younger women and were of larger tumor size than screen-detected cancers. In unconditional logistic regression models adjusted for age and tumor size, tumors with lobular (odds ratio [OR] = 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.9-4.2) or mucinous (OR = 5.5; 95% CI = 1.5-19.4) histology, high proliferation (by either mitotic count [OR = 2.9; 95% CI = 1.5-5.7] or Ki-67 antigen expression [OR = 2.3; 95% CI = 1.3-4.1]), high histologic grade (OR = 2.1; 95% CI = 1.2-4.0), high nuclear grade (OR = 2.0; 95% CI = 1.0-3.7), or negative estrogen receptor status (OR = 1.8; 95% CI = 1.0-3.1) were more likely to surface in the interval between screening examinations. Tumors with tubular histology (OR = 0.2; 95% CI = 0.0-0.8) or with a high percentage of in situ components (50%) (OR = 0.5; 95% CI = 0.2-1.2) were associated with an increased likelihood of screen detection. Our data from a large group of women in a defined population indicate that screening mammography may miss tumors of lobular or mucinous histology and some rapidly proliferating, high-grade tumors.

MeSH Terms
Adult Aged Biomarkers Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging,metabolism,pathology,prevention & control Case-Control Studies Female Humans Immunoenzyme Techniques Logistic Models Mammography Mass Screening Middle Aged Neoplasm Staging Time Factors
Chemicals
Biomarkers
Authors & Affiliations
10 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Porter P L
Program in Cancer Biology, Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. pporter@fhcrc.org
El-Bastawissi A Y
Mandelson M T
Lin M G
Khalid N
Watney E A
Cousens L
White D
Taplin S
White E
Article Info
Journal
Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Abbr.
J Natl Cancer Inst
ISSN
0027-8874
Published
1999-12-01
Pages
2020-8
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
7503089
Subset
IM
Grants
NCI NIH HHS · K07CA71869 · United States
NCI NIH HHS · U01CA63731 · United States
Corrections
CommentIn
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com