Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 8241912 Published · ppublish English Journal Article

Condoms: a wider range needed.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.) ·Vol. 307 ·No. 6910 ·1993-10-16 ·Pages 987

Tovey SJ, Bonell CP

Abstract

暂无摘要

Keywords
Barrier Methods--standards Biology Condom--standards Contraception Contraception Failure Contraceptive Methods--standards Contraceptive Usage Developed Countries Diseases England Europe Family Planning Genitalia Genitalia Male Hiv Infections--prevention and control Method Acceptability Northern Europe Physiology Research Report Sampling Studies Studies Surveys United Kingdom Urogenital System Viral Diseases
MeSH Terms
Condoms/standards Equipment Failure Humans Male
Authors & Affiliations
2 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Tovey S J
Lloyd Clinic, Department of Genitourinary Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London.
Bonell C P
Other Abstracts
eng

In England, 281 men attending a genitourinary clinic in south London completed a questionnaire designed to allow researchers to better understand condom failure. This area has one of the highest incidences in the UK of HIV seropositive pregnant women. 25% (70) faced difficulties putting on condoms. 52 of these men (19% of all men) said the condoms were too tight. These men were more likely to have condoms slip off than those who did not find condoms to be too tight (73% vs. 52%). Some men frequently had condoms coming off (8% for Blacks, 2% for Whites, and 21% for Asians). Condom splitting occurred sometimes for 18% of Blacks and 7% of Whites, but not for Asians. During the last year, 56% of all men, especially Black men (70% vs. 53% for Whites and 36% for Asians) had had intercourse with at least two partners. 22% of all men always used condoms. Black men were less likely to always use condoms than Whites and Asians (9% vs. 27% and 36%, respectively). These results indicate that many men may have penises too large for condoms to be placed on with ease. These men tend to experience the condom slipping off or splitting. These difficulties may affect their acceptability of condoms. Condom failure linked to tightness reinforces negative images of condoms. WHO's guidelines show that more than 33% of penises are larger than the British Standard Institute's standard dimensions for condoms (a flat width of 52 [SD 2] mm). Thus, the standard limits the production of an appropriate range of condom sizes. Further research is needed in condom design. The findings suggest that Blacks are at particular risk of HIV infection and that condom promotion efforts should target them.

References (1)
1 references, click to expand
  1. Condoms: a wider range needed.
    BMJ. 1993 Oct 16;307(6910):987 PMID: 8241912
Article Info
Journal
BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
Abbr.
BMJ
ISSN
0959-8138
Published
1993-10-16
Pages
987
Language
English
Region
England
NLM ID
8900488
PMCID
PMC1679208
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com