Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 26017310 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Chromothripsis from DNA damage in micronuclei.

Nature ·Vol. 522 ·No. 7555 ·2015-06-11 ·Pages 179-84

Zhang CZ, Spektor A, Cornils H, Francis JM, Jackson EK, Liu S, Meyerson M, Pellman D

Abstract

Genome sequencing has uncovered a new mutational phenomenon in cancer and congenital disorders called chromothripsis. Chromothripsis is characterized by extensive genomic rearrangements and an oscillating pattern of DNA copy number levels, all curiously restricted to one or a few chromosomes. The mechanism for chromothripsis is unknown, but we previously proposed that it could occur through the physical isolation of chromosomes in aberrant nuclear structures called micronuclei. Here, using a combination of live cell imaging and single-cell genome sequencing, we demonstrate that micronucleus formation can indeed generate a spectrum of genomic rearrangements, some of which recapitulate all known features of chromothripsis. These events are restricted to the mis-segregated chromosome and occur within one cell division. We demonstrate that the mechanism for chromothripsis can involve the fragmentation and subsequent reassembly of a single chromatid from a micronucleus. Collectively, these experiments establish a new mutational process of which chromothripsis is one extreme outcome.

MeSH Terms
Cell Line Cell Survival Chromosome Breakage Chromosome Segregation/genetics DNA Copy Number Variations/genetics DNA Damage Gene Rearrangement/genetics Genomic Instability/genetics Humans Micronuclei, Chromosome-Defective Mutation/genetics Neoplasms/genetics S Phase/genetics Single-Cell Analysis
Authors & Affiliations
8 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Zhang Cheng-Zhong
1] Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA [2] Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA [3] Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA [4] Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Spektor Alexander
1] Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA [2] Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA [3] Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Cornils Hauke
1] Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA [2] Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Francis Joshua M
1] Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA [2] Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.
Jackson Emily K
1] Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA [2] Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA [3] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815, USA.
Liu Shiwei
1] Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA [2] Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Meyerson Matthew
1] Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA [2] Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA [3] Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA [4] Center for Cancer Genome Discovery, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Pellman David
1] Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA [2] Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA [3] Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA [4] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815, USA.
References (46)
46 references, click to expand
  1. A telomere-dependent DNA damage checkpoint induced by prolonged mitotic arrest.
    Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2012 Apr;19(4):387-94 PMID: 22407014
  2. The elusive evidence for chromothripsis.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jul;42(13):8231-42 PMID: 24939897
  3. Mechanisms for recurrent and complex human genomic rearrangements.
    Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2012 Jun;22(3):211-20 PMID: 22440479
  4. Constitutional chromothripsis rearrangements involve clustered double-stranded DNA breaks and nonhomologous repair mechanisms.
    Cell Rep. 2012 Jun 28;1(6):648-55 PMID: 22813740
  5. Evolution of the cancer genome.
    Nat Rev Genet. 2012 Nov;13(11):795-806 PMID: 23044827
  6. Single-neuron sequencing analysis of L1 retrotransposition and somatic mutation in the human brain.
    Cell. 2012 Oct 26;151(3):483-96 PMID: 23101622
  7. Linking abnormal mitosis to the acquisition of DNA damage.
    J Cell Biol. 2012 Dec 10;199(6):871-81 PMID: 23229895
  8. Genome-wide detection of single-nucleotide and copy-number variations of a single human cell.
    Science. 2012 Dec 21;338(6114):1622-6 PMID: 23258894
  9. Criteria for inference of chromothripsis in cancer genomes.
    Cell. 2013 Mar 14;152(6):1226-36 PMID: 23498933
  10. Chromosome segregation errors as a cause of DNA damage and structural chromosome aberrations.
    Science. 2011 Sep 30;333(6051):1895-8 PMID: 21960636
  11. Chromothripsis and beyond: rapid genome evolution from complex chromosomal rearrangements.
    Genes Dev. 2013 Dec 1;27(23):2513-30 PMID: 24298051
  12. Engineered proteins detect spontaneous DNA breakage in human and bacterial cells.
    Elife. 2013;2:e01222 PMID: 24171103
  13. Catastrophic nuclear envelope collapse in cancer cell micronuclei.
    Cell. 2013 Jul 3;154(1):47-60 PMID: 23827674
  14. Single-cell paired-end genome sequencing reveals structural variation per cell cycle.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jul;41(12):6119-38 PMID: 23630320
  15. EGFR variant heterogeneity in glioblastoma resolved through single-nucleus sequencing.
    Cancer Discov. 2014 Aug;4(8):956-71 PMID: 24893890
  16. Clonal evolution in breast cancer revealed by single nucleus genome sequencing.
    Nature. 2014 Aug 14;512(7513):155-60 PMID: 25079324
  17. Mechanisms underlying mutational signatures in human cancers.
    Nat Rev Genet. 2014 Sep;15(9):585-98 PMID: 24981601
  18. A quantitative comparison of single-cell whole genome amplification methods.
    PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e105585 PMID: 25136831
  19. Single cell sequencing reveals low levels of aneuploidy across mammalian tissues.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 16;111(37):13409-14 PMID: 25197050
  20. The architecture and evolution of cancer neochromosomes.
    Cancer Cell. 2014 Nov 10;26(5):653-67 PMID: 25517748
  21. Cell lineage analysis in human brain using endogenous retroelements.
    Neuron. 2015 Jan 7;85(1):49-59 PMID: 25569347
  22. Calibrating genomic and allelic coverage bias in single-cell sequencing.
    Nat Commun. 2015;6:6822 PMID: 25879913
  23. Pan-cancer patterns of somatic copy number alteration.
    Nat Genet. 2013 Oct;45(10):1134-40 PMID: 24071852
  24. Breakpoint profiling of 64 cancer genomes reveals numerous complex rearrangements spawned by homology-independent mechanisms.
    Genome Res. 2013 May;23(5):762-76 PMID: 23410887
  25. Comprehensive human genome amplification using multiple displacement amplification.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Apr 16;99(8):5261-6 PMID: 11959976
  26. Whole genome analysis of genetic alterations in small DNA samples using hyperbranched strand displacement amplification and array-CGH.
    Genome Res. 2003 Feb;13(2):294-307 PMID: 12566408
  27. Resolution of anaphase bridges in cancer cells.
    Chromosoma. 2004 Jun;112(8):389-97 PMID: 15156327
  28. Double minute chromosomes can be produced from precursors derived from a chromosomal deletion.
    Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Apr;8(4):1525-33 PMID: 2898098
  29. Model for the formation of double minutes from prematurely condensed chromosomes of replicating micronuclei in drug-treated Chinese hamster ovary cells undergoing DNA amplification.
    Cancer Res. 1989 Dec 1;49(23):6731-7 PMID: 2819718
  30. Premature condensation induces breaks at the interface of early and late replicating chromosome bands bearing common fragile sites.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Dec 13;102(50):18069-74 PMID: 16330769
  31. Assessment of whole genome amplification-induced bias through high-throughput, massively parallel whole genome sequencing.
    BMC Genomics. 2006;7:216 PMID: 16928277
  32. Mechanism of chimera formation during the Multiple Displacement Amplification reaction.
    BMC Biotechnol. 2007;7:19 PMID: 17430586
  33. The emerging role of nuclear architecture in DNA repair and genome maintenance.
    Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009 Apr;10(4):243-54 PMID: 19277046
  34. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome.
    Science. 2009 Oct 9;326(5950):289-93 PMID: 19815776
  35. The landscape of somatic copy-number alteration across human cancers.
    Nature. 2010 Feb 18;463(7283):899-905 PMID: 20164920
  36. Genetic activities in micronuclei: is the DNA entrapped in micronuclei lost for the cell?
    Mutat Res. 2010 Jul-Sep;705(1):60-7 PMID: 20307686
  37. Gene amplification as double minutes or homogeneously staining regions in solid tumors: origin and structure.
    Genome Res. 2010 Sep;20(9):1198-206 PMID: 20631050
  38. Genome sequencing of pediatric medulloblastoma links catastrophic DNA rearrangements with TP53 mutations.
    Cell. 2012 Jan 20;148(1-2):59-71 PMID: 22265402
  39. DNA breaks and chromosome pulverization from errors in mitosis.
    Nature. 2012 Feb 2;482(7383):53-8 PMID: 22258507
  40. Complex reorganization and predominant non-homologous repair following chromosomal breakage in karyotypically balanced germline rearrangements and transgenic integration.
    Nat Genet. 2012 Apr;44(4):390-7, S1 PMID: 22388000
  41. Prolonged prometaphase blocks daughter cell proliferation despite normal completion of mitosis.
    Curr Biol. 2010 Sep 28;20(18):1666-71 PMID: 20832310
  42. Massive genomic rearrangement acquired in a single catastrophic event during cancer development.
    Cell. 2011 Jan 7;144(1):27-40 PMID: 21215367
  43. DNA ligase III promotes alternative nonhomologous end-joining during chromosomal translocation formation.
    PLoS Genet. 2011 Jun;7(6):e1002080 PMID: 21655080
  44. Aneuploidy drives genomic instability in yeast.
    Science. 2011 Aug 19;333(6045):1026-30 PMID: 21852501
  45. Chromosome catastrophes involve replication mechanisms generating complex genomic rearrangements.
    Cell. 2011 Sep 16;146(6):889-903 PMID: 21925314
  46. Summarizing and correcting the GC content bias in high-throughput sequencing.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 May;40(10):e72 PMID: 22323520
Article Info
Journal
Nature
Abbr.
Nature
ISSN
1476-4687
Published
2015-06-11
Epub
2015-00-27
Pages
179-84
Language
English
Region
England
NLM ID
0410462
PMCID
PMC4742237
Subset
IM
Grants
NIGMS NIH HHS · R37 GM061345 · United States
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · United States
NIGMS NIH HHS · R01 GM083299 · United States
NIGMS NIH HHS · R01 GM061345 · United States
NIGMS NIH HHS · GM083299-18 · United States
Databases
SRA
Corrections
CommentIn
CommentIn
CommentIn
CommentIn
CommentIn
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com