Abstract
Genome-wide methylation profiling has led to more comprehensive insights into gene regulation mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets. Illumina Human Methylation BeadChip is one of the most commonly used genome-wide methylation platforms. Similar to other microarray experiments, methylation data is susceptible to various technical artifacts, particularly batch effects. To date, little attention has been given to issues related to normalization and batch effect correction for this kind of data. We evaluated three common normalization approaches and investigated their performance in batch effect removal using three datasets with different degrees of batch effects generated from HumanMethylation27 platform: quantile normalization at average β value (QNβ); two step quantile normalization at probe signals implemented in "lumi" package of R (lumi); and quantile normalization of A and B signal separately (ABnorm). Subsequent Empirical Bayes (EB) batch adjustment was also evaluated. Each normalization could remove a portion of batch effects and their effectiveness differed depending on the severity of batch effects in a dataset. For the dataset with minor batch effects (Dataset 1), normalization alone appeared adequate and "lumi" showed the best performance. However, all methods left substantial batch effects intact in the datasets with obvious batch effects and further correction was necessary. Without any correction, 50 and 66 percent of CpGs were associated with batch effects in Dataset 2 and 3, respectively. After QNβ, lumi or ABnorm, the number of CpGs associated with batch effects were reduced to 24, 32, and 26 percent for Dataset 2; and 37, 46, and 35 percent for Dataset 3, respectively. Additional EB correction effectively removed such remaining non-biological effects. More importantly, the two-step procedure almost tripled the numbers of CpGs associated with the outcome of interest for the two datasets. Genome-wide methylation data from Infinium Methylation BeadChip can be susceptible to batch effects with profound impacts on downstream analyses and conclusions. Normalization can reduce part but not all batch effects. EB correction along with normalization is recommended for effective batch effect removal.
MeSH Terms
Adult
CpG Islands/genetics
DNA Methylation/genetics
Databases, Genetic
Genome, Human/genetics
Humans
Male
Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis/methods
Reproducibility of Results
Authors & Affiliations
9 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Sun Zhifu
Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Chai High Seng
Wu Yanhong
White Wendy M
Donkena Krishna V
Klein Christopher J
Garovic Vesna D
Therneau Terry M
Kocher Jean-Pierre A
References (32)
32 references, click to expand
-
Principles and challenges of genomewide DNA methylation analysis.
Nat Rev Genet. 2010 Mar;11(3):191-203
PMID: 20125086
-
Aberrant global methylation patterns affect the molecular pathogenesis and prognosis of multiple myeloma.
Blood. 2011 Jan 13;117(2):553-62
PMID: 20944071
-
Adjustment of systematic microarray data biases.
Bioinformatics. 2004 Jan 1;20(1):105-14
PMID: 14693816
-
Impaired hydroxylation of 5-methylcytosine in myeloid cancers with mutant TET2.
Nature. 2010 Dec 9;468(7325):839-43
PMID: 21057493
-
The removal of multiplicative, systematic bias allows integration of breast cancer gene expression datasets - improving meta-analysis and prediction of prognosis.
BMC Med Genomics. 2008 Sep 21;1:42
PMID: 18803878
-
Normalization of Illumina Infinium whole-genome SNP data improves copy number estimates and allelic intensity ratios.
BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Oct 02;9:409
PMID: 18831757
-
Tackling the widespread and critical impact of batch effects in high-throughput data.
Nat Rev Genet. 2010 Oct;11(10):733-9
PMID: 20838408
-
Preprocessing differential methylation hybridization microarray data.
BioData Min. 2011 May 16;4:13
PMID: 21575229
-
Age-dependent DNA methylation of genes that are suppressed in stem cells is a hallmark of cancer.
Genome Res. 2010 Apr;20(4):440-6
PMID: 20219944
-
Promoter hypermethylation in prostate cancer.
Cancer Control. 2010 Oct;17(4):245-55
PMID: 20861812
-
Absolute quantitation of DNA methylation of 28 candidate genes in prostate cancer using pyrosequencing.
Dis Markers. 2011;30(4):151-61
PMID: 21694441
-
Human housekeeping genes are compact.
Trends Genet. 2003 Jul;19(7):362-5
PMID: 12850439
-
Obesity related methylation changes in DNA of peripheral blood leukocytes.
BMC Med. 2010 Dec 21;8:87
PMID: 21176133
-
Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis for diabetic nephropathy in type 1 diabetes mellitus.
BMC Med Genomics. 2010 Aug 05;3:33
PMID: 20687937
-
Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling using Infinium® assay.
Epigenomics. 2009 Oct;1(1):177-200
PMID: 22122642
-
Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods.
Biostatistics. 2007 Jan;8(1):118-27
PMID: 16632515
-
Altered DNA methylation in leukocytes with trisomy 21.
PLoS Genet. 2010 Nov 18;6(11):e1001212
PMID: 21124956
-
Supervised normalization of microarrays.
Bioinformatics. 2010 May 15;26(10):1308-15
PMID: 20363728
-
DNA methylation in glioblastoma: impact on gene expression and clinical outcome.
BMC Genomics. 2010 Dec 14;11:701
PMID: 21156036
-
Removing batch effects in analysis of expression microarray data: an evaluation of six batch adjustment methods.
PLoS One. 2011 Feb 28;6(2):e17238
PMID: 21386892
-
DNA methylation patterns associate with genetic and gene expression variation in HapMap cell lines.
Genome Biol. 2011;12(1):R10
PMID: 21251332
-
The power and the promise of DNA methylation markers.
Nat Rev Cancer. 2003 Apr;3(4):253-66
PMID: 12671664
-
Singular value decomposition for genome-wide expression data processing and modeling.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Aug 29;97(18):10101-6
PMID: 10963673
-
Human aging-associated DNA hypermethylation occurs preferentially at bivalent chromatin domains.
Genome Res. 2010 Apr;20(4):434-9
PMID: 20219945
-
An integrative multi-dimensional genetic and epigenetic strategy to identify aberrant genes and pathways in cancer.
BMC Syst Biol. 2010 May 17;4:67
PMID: 20478067
-
Epigenetic profiling of somatic tissues from human autopsy specimens identifies tissue- and individual-specific DNA methylation patterns.
Hum Mol Genet. 2009 Dec 15;18(24):4808-17
PMID: 19776032
-
DNA methylation profiling reveals novel biomarkers and important roles for DNA methyltransferases in prostate cancer.
Genome Res. 2011 Jul;21(7):1017-27
PMID: 21521786
-
Capturing heterogeneity in gene expression studies by surrogate variable analysis.
PLoS Genet. 2007 Sep;3(9):1724-35
PMID: 17907809
-
A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias.
Bioinformatics. 2003 Jan 22;19(2):185-93
PMID: 12538238
-
A comparison of batch effect removal methods for enhancement of prediction performance using MAQC-II microarray gene expression data.
Pharmacogenomics J. 2010 Aug;10(4):278-91
PMID: 20676067
-
Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis in cohesin mutant human cell lines.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Sep;38(17):5657-71
PMID: 20448023
-
lumi: a pipeline for processing Illumina microarray.
Bioinformatics. 2008 Jul 1;24(13):1547-8
PMID: 18467348