Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 20818657 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Achieving reliability and high accuracy in automated protein docking: ClusPro, PIPER, SDU, and stability analysis in CAPRI rounds 13-19.

Proteins ·Vol. 78 ·No. 15 ·2010-11-15 ·Pages 3124-30

Kozakov D, Hall DR, Beglov D, Brenke R, Comeau SR, Shen Y, Li K, Zheng J, Vakili P, Paschalidis ICh, Vajda S

Abstract

Our approach to protein-protein docking includes three main steps. First, we run PIPER, a rigid body docking program based on the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) correlation approach, extended to use pairwise interactions potentials. Second, the 1000 best energy conformations are clustered, and the 30 largest clusters are retained for refinement. Third, the stability of the clusters is analyzed by short Monte Carlo simulations, and the structures are refined by the medium-range optimization method SDU. The first two steps of this approach are implemented in the ClusPro 2.0 protein-protein docking server. Despite being fully automated, the last step is computationally too expensive to be included in the server. When comparing the models obtained in CAPRI rounds 13-19 by ClusPro, by the refinement of the ClusPro predictions and by all predictor groups, we arrived at three conclusions. First, for the first time in the CAPRI history, our automated ClusPro server was able to compete with the best human predictor groups. Second, selecting the top ranked models, our current protocol reliably generates high-quality structures of protein-protein complexes from the structures of separately crystallized proteins, even in the absence of biological information, provided that there is limited backbone conformational change. Third, despite occasional successes, homology modeling requires further improvement to achieve reliable docking results.

MeSH Terms
Algorithms Cluster Analysis Computational Biology/methods Models, Chemical Molecular Dynamics Simulation Monte Carlo Method Protein Binding Protein Conformation Protein Multimerization Proteins/chemistry,metabolism Software
Chemicals
Proteins
Authors & Affiliations
11 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Kozakov Dima
BioMolecular Engineering Research Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA. vajda@bu.edu
Hall David R
Beglov Dmitri
Brenke Ryan
Comeau Stephen R
Shen Yang
Li Keyong
Zheng Jiefu
Vakili Pirooz
Paschalidis Ioannis Ch
Vajda Sandor
References (16)
16 references, click to expand
  1. Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes.
    Proteins. 1999 May 15;35(3):364-73 PMID: 10328272
  2. Self-association of TPR domains: Lessons learned from a designed, consensus-based TPR oligomer.
    Proteins. 2010 Jul;78(9):2131-43 PMID: 20455268
  3. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction.
    BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Jan 23;9:40 PMID: 18215316
  4. The structural and energetic basis for high selectivity in a high-affinity protein-protein interaction.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jun 1;107(22):10080-5 PMID: 20479265
  5. PIPER: an FFT-based protein docking program with pairwise potentials.
    Proteins. 2006 Nov 1;65(2):392-406 PMID: 16933295
  6. Scoring docked conformations generated by rigid-body protein-protein docking.
    Proteins. 2000 Aug 15;40(3):525-37 PMID: 10861944
  7. Development of unified statistical potentials describing protein-protein interactions.
    Biophys J. 2003 Mar;84(3):1895-901 PMID: 12609891
  8. ClusPro: an automated docking and discrimination method for the prediction of protein complexes.
    Bioinformatics. 2004 Jan 1;20(1):45-50 PMID: 14693807
  9. RDOCK: refinement of rigid-body protein docking predictions.
    Proteins. 2003 Nov 15;53(3):693-707 PMID: 14579360
  10. Comparative protein structure modeling using Modeller.
    Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2006 Oct;Chapter 5:Unit-5.6 PMID: 18428767
  11. A physical reference state unifies the structure-derived potential of mean force for protein folding and binding.
    Proteins. 2004 Jul 1;56(1):93-101 PMID: 15162489
  12. Combination of scoring functions improves discrimination in protein-protein docking.
    Proteins. 2003 Dec 1;53(4):840-54 PMID: 14635126
  13. Optimal clustering for detecting near-native conformations in protein docking.
    Biophys J. 2005 Aug;89(2):867-75 PMID: 15908573
  14. Protein docking by the underestimation of free energy funnels in the space of encounter complexes.
    PLoS Comput Biol. 2008 Oct;4(10):e1000191 PMID: 18846200
  15. Discrimination of near-native structures in protein-protein docking by testing the stability of local minima.
    Proteins. 2008 Aug 15;72(3):993-1004 PMID: 18300245
  16. DARS (Decoys As the Reference State) potentials for protein-protein docking.
    Biophys J. 2008 Nov 1;95(9):4217-27 PMID: 18676649
Article Info
Journal
Proteins
Abbr.
Proteins
ISSN
1097-0134
Published
2010-11-15
Pages
3124-30
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
8700181
PMCID
PMC3027207
Subset
IM
Grants
NIGMS NIH HHS · R01 GM061867-10 · United States
NIGMS NIH HHS · R01 GM061867 · United States
NIGMS NIH HHS · GM93147 · United States
NIGMS NIH HHS · GM61867 · United States
NIGMS NIH HHS · R01 GM093147 · United States
NIGMS NIH HHS · R01 GM064700 · United States
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com