Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 15908573 Published · ppublish English Evaluation Study Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Optimal clustering for detecting near-native conformations in protein docking.

Biophysical journal ·Vol. 89 ·No. 2 ·2005-08-00 ·Pages 867-75

Kozakov D, Clodfelter KH, Vajda S, Camacho CJ

Abstract

Clustering is one of the most powerful tools in computational biology. The conventional wisdom is that events that occur in clusters are probably not random. In protein docking, the underlying principle is that clustering occurs because long-range electrostatic and/or desolvation forces steer the proteins to a low free-energy attractor at the binding region. Something similar occurs in the docking of small molecules, although in this case shorter-range van der Waals forces play a more critical role. Based on the above, we have developed two different clustering strategies to predict docked conformations based on the clustering properties of a uniform sampling of low free-energy protein-protein and protein-small molecule complexes. We report on significant improvements in the automated prediction and discrimination of docked conformations by using the cluster size and consensus as a ranking criterion. We show that the success of clustering depends on identifying the appropriate clustering radius of the system. The clustering radius for protein-protein complexes is consistent with the range of the electrostatics and desolvation free energies (i.e., between 4 and 9 Angstroms); for protein-small molecule docking, the radius is set by van der Waals interactions (i.e., at approximately 2 Angstroms). Without any a priori information, a simple analysis of the histogram of distance separations between the set of docked conformations can evaluate the clustering properties of the data set. Clustering is observed when the histogram is bimodal. Data clustering is optimal if one chooses the clustering radius to be the minimum after the first peak of the bimodal distribution. We show that using this optimal radius further improves the discrimination of near-native complex structures.

MeSH Terms
Amino Acid Sequence Binding Sites Cluster Analysis Computer Simulation Models, Chemical Models, Molecular Molecular Sequence Data Multiprotein Complexes/analysis,chemistry Protein Binding Protein Conformation Protein Interaction Mapping/methods Proteins/analysis,chemistry,classification Sequence Analysis, Protein/methods
Chemicals
Multiprotein Complexes Proteins
Authors & Affiliations
4 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Kozakov Dima
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Massachusetts, USA.
Clodfelter Karl H
Vajda Sandor
Camacho Carlos J
References (30)
30 references, click to expand
  1. Organic solvents identify specific ligand binding sites on protein surfaces.
    Nat Biotechnol. 1997 Mar;15(3):264-8 PMID: 9062927
  2. Protein docking for low-resolution structures.
    Protein Eng. 1995 Apr;8(4):371-7 PMID: 7567922
  3. Simulation of the diffusional association of barnase and barstar.
    Biophys J. 1997 May;72(5):1917-29 PMID: 9129797
  4. Locating and characterizing binding sites on proteins.
    Nat Biotechnol. 1996 May;14(5):595-9 PMID: 9630949
  5. Clustering of low-energy conformations near the native structures of small proteins.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Sep 15;95(19):11158-62 PMID: 9736706
  6. Cluster analysis of consensus water sites in thrombin and trypsin shows conservation between serine proteases and contributions to ligand specificity.
    Protein Sci. 1998 Oct;7(10):2054-64 PMID: 9792092
  7. Hidden Markov models for detecting remote protein homologies.
    Bioinformatics. 1998;14(10):846-56 PMID: 9927713
  8. Free energy landscapes of encounter complexes in protein-protein association.
    Biophys J. 1999 Mar;76(3):1166-78 PMID: 10049302
  9. Exploring the binding site structure of the PPAR gamma ligand-binding domain by computational solvent mapping.
    Biochemistry. 2005 Feb 1;44(4):1193-209 PMID: 15667213
  10. Activation of the LicT transcriptional antiterminator involves a domain swing/lock mechanism provoking massive structural changes.
    J Biol Chem. 2005 Apr 15;280(15):14780-9 PMID: 15699035
  11. Rapid, electrostatically assisted association of proteins.
    Nat Struct Biol. 1996 May;3(5):427-31 PMID: 8612072
  12. Locating interaction sites on proteins: the crystal structure of thermolysin soaked in 2% to 100% isopropanol.
    Proteins. 1999 Dec 1;37(4):628-40 PMID: 10651278
  13. Kinetics of desolvation-mediated protein-protein binding.
    Biophys J. 2000 Mar;78(3):1094-105 PMID: 10692300
  14. Scoring docked conformations generated by rigid-body protein-protein docking.
    Proteins. 2000 Aug 15;40(3):525-37 PMID: 10861944
  15. HMMSTR: a hidden Markov model for local sequence-structure correlations in proteins.
    J Mol Biol. 2000 Aug 4;301(1):173-90 PMID: 10926500
  16. Experimental and computational mapping of the binding surface of a crystalline protein.
    Protein Eng. 2001 Jan;14(1):47-59 PMID: 11287678
  17. Protein docking along smooth association pathways.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Sep 11;98(19):10636-41 PMID: 11517309
  18. Computational mapping identifies the binding sites of organic solvents on proteins.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Apr 2;99(7):4290-5 PMID: 11904374
  19. Algorithms for computational solvent mapping of proteins.
    Proteins. 2003 May 15;51(3):340-51 PMID: 12696046
  20. A novel shape complementarity scoring function for protein-protein docking.
    Proteins. 2003 May 15;51(3):397-408 PMID: 12696051
  21. Assessment of blind predictions of protein-protein interactions: current status of docking methods.
    Proteins. 2003 Jul 1;52(1):51-67 PMID: 12784368
  22. A protein-protein docking benchmark.
    Proteins. 2003 Jul 1;52(1):88-91 PMID: 12784372
  23. Complex between nidogen and laminin fragments reveals a paradigmatic beta-propeller interface.
    Nature. 2003 Aug 21;424(6951):969-74 PMID: 12931195
  24. Consensus alignment for reliable framework prediction in homology modeling.
    Bioinformatics. 2003 Sep 1;19(13):1682-91 PMID: 12967965
  25. Identification of substrate binding sites in enzymes by computational solvent mapping.
    J Mol Biol. 2003 Oct 3;332(5):1095-113 PMID: 14499612
  26. Identification of protein-protein interaction sites from docking energy landscapes.
    J Mol Biol. 2004 Jan 16;335(3):843-65 PMID: 14687579
  27. ClusPro: an automated docking and discrimination method for the prediction of protein complexes.
    Bioinformatics. 2004 Jan 1;20(1):45-50 PMID: 14693807
  28. Anchor residues in protein-protein interactions.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Aug 3;101(31):11287-92 PMID: 15269345
  29. Detection of common three-dimensional substructures in proteins.
    Proteins. 1991;11(1):52-8 PMID: 1660134
  30. Determination of atomic desolvation energies from the structures of crystallized proteins.
    J Mol Biol. 1997 Apr 4;267(3):707-26 PMID: 9126848
Article Info
Journal
Biophysical journal
Abbr.
Biophys J
ISSN
0006-3495
Published
2005-08-00
Epub
2005-00-20
Pages
867-75
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
0370626
PMCID
PMC1366636
Subset
IM
Grants
NIGMS NIH HHS · R01 GM061867 · United States
NIGMS NIH HHS · R01 GM064700 · United States
NIGMS NIH HHS · GM61867 · United States
NIGMS NIH HHS · GM64700 · United States
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com