Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 18822122 Published · epublish English Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Variation in incidence of breast, lung and cervical cancer and malignant melanoma of skin by socioeconomic group in England.

BMC cancer ·Vol. 8 ·2008-09-26 ·Pages 271

Shack L, Jordan C, Thomson CS, Mak V, Møller H, UK Association of Cancer Registries

Abstract

Cancer incidence varies by socioeconomic group and these variations have been linked with environmental and lifestyle factors, differences in access to health care and health seeking behaviour. Socioeconomic variations in cancer incidence by region and age are less clearly understood but they are crucial for targeting prevention measures and health care commissioning. Data were obtained from all eight English cancer registries for patients diagnosed between 1998 and 2003, for all invasive cases of female breast cancer (ICD-10 code C50), lung cancer (ICD-10 codes C33-C34), cervical cancer (ICD-10 code C53), and malignant melanoma of the skin (ICD-10 code C43). Socioeconomic status was assigned to each patient based on their postcode of residence at diagnosis, using the income domain of the Index of Multiple Deprivation 2004. We analysed the socioeconomic variations in the incidence of breast, lung and cervical cancer and malignant melanoma of the skin for England, and regionally and by age. Incidence was highest for the most deprived patients for lung cancer and cervical cancer, whilst the opposite was observed for malignant melanoma and breast cancer. The difference in incidence between the most and the least deprived groups was higher for lung cancer patients aged under 65 at diagnosis than those over 65 at diagnosis, which may indicate a cohort effect. There were regional differences in the socioeconomic gradients with the gap being widest for lung and cervical cancer in the North (North East, North West and Yorkshire and Humberside) and for malignant melanoma in the East and South West. There were only modest variations in breast cancer incidence by region. If the incidence of lung and cervical cancer were decreased to that of the least deprived group it would prevent 36% of lung cancer cases in men, 38% of lung cancer cases in women and 28% of cervical cancer cases. Incidence of breast cancer and melanoma was highest in the least deprived group, therefore if all socioeconomic groups had incidence rates similar to the least deprived group it is estimated that the number of cases would increase by 7% for breast cancer, 27% for melanoma in men and 29% for melanoma in women. National comparison of socioeconomic variations in cancer incidence by region and age can provide an unbiased basis for public health prevention and health commissioning. Decreasing inequalities in incidence requires the integration of information on risk factors, incidence and projected incidence but targeted public health interventions could help to reduce regional inequalities in incidence and reduce the future cancer burden.

MeSH Terms
Adult Age Factors Aged Aged, 80 and over Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology,mortality,pathology England Female Humans Incidence Income Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology,mortality,pathology Male Melanoma/epidemiology,mortality,pathology Middle Aged Neoplasm Staging Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology,mortality Risk Factors Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology,mortality,pathology Smoking Social Class Sunlight Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology,mortality,pathology
Authors & Affiliations
6 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Shack Lorraine
North West Cancer Intelligence Service, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Kinnaird Road, Withington, Manchester, M20 4QL, UK. lorraine.shack@nwcis.nhs.uk
Jordan Catrina
Thomson Catherine S
Mak Vivian
Møller Henrik
UK Association of Cancer Registries
References (49)
49 references, click to expand
  1. Prognostic factors in women with breast cancer: distribution by socioeconomic status and effect on differences in survival.
    J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 May;55(5):308-15 PMID: 11297648
  2. Residential area deprivation predicts fruit and vegetable consumption independently of individual educational level and occupational social class: a cross sectional population study in the Norfolk cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer (EPIC-Norfolk).
    J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Aug;58(8):686-91 PMID: 15252072
  3. Impact of deprivation and rural residence on treatment of colorectal and lung cancer.
    Br J Cancer. 2002 Sep 9;87(6):585-90 PMID: 12237766
  4. Skin cancer and ultraviolet-B radiation under the Antarctic ozone hole: southern Chile, 1987-2000.
    Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2002 Dec;18(6):294-302 PMID: 12535025
  5. Geographical inequalities in lung cancer management and survival in South East England: evidence of variation in access to oncology services?
    Br J Cancer. 2003 Apr 7;88(7):1025-31 PMID: 12671698
  6. How complete has skin cancer registration been in the UK? A study from Yorkshire.
    Eur J Cancer Prev. 2003 Apr;12(2):125-33 PMID: 12671536
  7. Cervical screening and health inequality in England in the 1990s.
    J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Jun;57(6):417-23 PMID: 12775786
  8. Are there socioeconomic gradients in stage and grade of breast cancer at diagnosis? Cross sectional analysis of UK cancer registry data.
    BMJ. 2004 Jul 17;329(7458):142 PMID: 15175228
  9. Influence of rural environment on diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of colorectal cancer.
    J Epidemiol Community Health. 1992 Aug;46(4):365-7 PMID: 1431708
  10. Problems with registration of cutaneous malignant melanoma in England.
    Br J Cancer. 1995 Jul;72(1):224-8 PMID: 7599057
  11. Deprivation, stage at diagnosis and cancer survival.
    Int J Cancer. 1995 Nov 3;63(3):324-9 PMID: 7591225
  12. Risk factors for HPV DNA detection in middle-aged women.
    Sex Transm Dis. 1996 Nov-Dec;23(6):504-10 PMID: 8946637
  13. Incidence of malignant melanoma of the skin in Norway, 1955-1989: associations with solar ultraviolet radiation, income and holidays abroad.
    Int J Epidemiol. 1996 Dec;25(6):1132-8 PMID: 9027516
  14. Associations of sedentary lifestyle, obesity, smoking, alcohol use, and diabetes with the risk of colorectal cancer.
    Cancer Res. 1997 Nov 1;57(21):4787-94 PMID: 9354440
  15. Socioeconomic differences in cancer survival: a review of the evidence.
    IARC Sci Publ. 1997;(138):177-206 PMID: 9353665
  16. Deprivation and emergency admissions for cancers of colorectum, lung, and breast in south east England: ecological study.
    BMJ. 1998 Jul 25;317(7153):245-52 PMID: 9677214
  17. Are there socioeconomic gradients in the quality of data held by UK cancer registries?
    J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Dec;58(12):1052-4 PMID: 15547072
  18. Social capital, geography and health: a small-area analysis for England.
    Soc Sci Med. 2005 Mar;60(6):1267-83 PMID: 15626523
  19. Choice of geographic unit influences socioeconomic inequalities in breast cancer survival.
    Br J Cancer. 2005 Apr 11;92(7):1279-82 PMID: 15798765
  20. Sociodemographic factors and delays in the diagnosis of six cancers: analysis of data from the "National Survey of NHS Patients: Cancer".
    Br J Cancer. 2005 Jun 6;92(11):1971-5 PMID: 15900296
  21. Socioeconomic status and the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 among oncogenic human papillomavirus DNA-positive women with equivocal or mildly abnormal cytology.
    Cancer. 2005 Jul 1;104(1):61-70 PMID: 15889450
  22. Patients' help-seeking experiences and delay in cancer presentation: a qualitative synthesis.
    Lancet. 2005 Sep 3-9;366(9488):825-31 PMID: 16139657
  23. Sociodemographic and attitudinal correlates of cervical screening uptake in a national sample of women in Britain.
    Soc Sci Med. 2005 Dec;61(11):2460-5 PMID: 16102881
  24. Origins of socio-economic inequalities in cancer survival: a review.
    Ann Oncol. 2006 Jan;17(1):5-19 PMID: 16143594
  25. Cancer survival in the elderly: effects of socio-economic factors and health care system features (ELDCARE project).
    Eur J Cancer. 2006 Jan;42(2):234-42 PMID: 16359860
  26. Experience of health changes and reasons for delay in seeking care: a UK study of the months prior to the diagnosis of lung cancer.
    Soc Sci Med. 2006 Mar;62(6):1381-91 PMID: 16168544
  27. Socioeconomic deprivation, travel distance, location of service, and uptake of breast cancer screening in North Derbyshire, UK.
    J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Mar;60(3):208-12 PMID: 16476749
  28. Explaining inequalities in access to treatment in lung cancer.
    J Eval Clin Pract. 2006 Oct;12(5):573-82 PMID: 16987120
  29. Obesity and prognosis of breast cancer.
    Obes Rev. 2006 Nov;7(4):333-40 PMID: 17038127
  30. Socioeconomic gradients in smoking among young women: A British survey.
    Soc Sci Med. 2006 Dec;63(11):2791-800 PMID: 16962221
  31. Reproductive factors and breast cancer risk according to joint estrogen and progesterone receptor status: a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.
    Breast Cancer Res. 2006;8(4):R43 PMID: 16859501
  32. The association of use of sunbeds with cutaneous malignant melanoma and other skin cancers: A systematic review.
    Int J Cancer. 2007 Mar 1;120(5):1116-22 PMID: 17131335
  33. Socioeconomic background in relation to stage at diagnosis, treatment and survival in women with breast cancer.
    Br J Cancer. 2007 Mar 12;96(5):836-40 PMID: 17311024
  34. The future burden of cancer in England: incidence and numbers of new patients in 2020.
    Br J Cancer. 2007 May 7;96(9):1484-8 PMID: 17473821
  35. Sociodemographic factors associated with high-risk human papillomavirus infection.
    Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jul;110(1):87-95 PMID: 17601901
  36. Quantitative risk assessment of sunbeds: impact of new high power lamps.
    Br J Dermatol. 2007 Aug;157(2):350-6 PMID: 17650177
  37. Primary and secondary care management of women with early breast cancer from affluent and deprived areas: retrospective review of hospital and general practice records.
    BMJ. 2000 May 27;320(7247):1442-5 PMID: 10827047
  38. Management and survival of patients with lung cancer in Scotland diagnosed in 1995: results of a national population based study.
    Thorax. 2001 Mar;56(3):212-7 PMID: 11182014
  39. Patterns of referral, management and survival of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer in Scotland during 1988 and 1993: results of a national, retrospective population-based audit.
    BJU Int. 2001 Mar;87(4):339-47 PMID: 11251527
  40. Relation between socioeconomic status and tumour stage in patients with breast, colorectal, ovarian, and lung cancer: results from four national, population based studies.
    BMJ. 2001 Apr 7;322(7290):830-1 PMID: 11290637
  41. Socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival in Scotland 1986-2000.
    Br J Cancer. 2007 Oct 8;97(7):999-1004 PMID: 17876331
  42. Trends in cancer incidence by deprivation, England and Wales, 1990-2002.
    Health Stat Q. 2007 Winter;(36):24-35 PMID: 18092540
  43. Rising trends in the incidence of and mortality from cutaneous melanoma in the Netherlands: a Northwest to Southeast gradient?
    Eur J Cancer. 2003 Jul;39(10):1439-46 PMID: 12826048
  44. Surgeon workload and survival from breast cancer.
    Br J Cancer. 2003 Aug 4;89(3):487-91 PMID: 12888817
  45. Colorectal cancer, screening and survival: the influence of socio-economic deprivation.
    Public Health. 2003 Nov;117(6):389-95 PMID: 14522153
  46. Improvements in survival for women with breast cancer in Scotland between 1987 and 1993: impact of earlier diagnosis and changes in treatment.
    Eur J Cancer. 2004 Mar;40(5):743-53 PMID: 15010076
  47. Trends and socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival in England and Wales up to 2001.
    Br J Cancer. 2004 Apr 5;90(7):1367-73 PMID: 15054456
  48. Cancer disparities by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status.
    CA Cancer J Clin. 2004 Mar-Apr;54(2):78-93 PMID: 15061598
  49. Comparison of various characteristics of women who do and do not attend for breast cancer screening.
    Breast Cancer Res. 2002;4(1):R1 PMID: 11879559
Article Info
Journal
BMC cancer
Abbr.
BMC Cancer
ISSN
1471-2407
Published
2008-09-26
Epub
2008-00-26
Pages
271
Language
English
Region
England
NLM ID
100967800
PMCID
PMC2577116
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com