Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 18364713 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

The role of disorder in interaction networks: a structural analysis.

Molecular systems biology ·Vol. 4 ·2008-00-00 ·Pages 179

Kim PM, Sboner A, Xia Y, Gerstein M

Abstract

Recent studies have emphasized the value of including structural information into the topological analysis of protein networks. Here, we utilized structural information to investigate the role of intrinsic disorder in these networks. Hub proteins tend to be more disordered than other proteins (i.e. the proteome average); however, we find this only true for those with one or two binding interfaces ('single'-interface hubs). In contrast, the distribution of disordered residues in multi-interface hubs is indistinguishable from the overall proteome. Surprisingly, we find that the binding interfaces in single-interface hubs are highly structured, as is the case for multi-interface hubs. However, the binding partners of single-interface hubs tend to have a higher level of disorder than the proteome average, suggesting that their binding promiscuity is related to the disorder of their binding partners. In turn, the higher level of disorder of single-interface hubs can be partly explained by their tendency to bind to each other in a cascade. A good illustration of this trend can be found in signaling pathways and, more specifically, in kinase cascades. Finally, our findings have implications for the current controversy related to party and date-hubs.

MeSH Terms
Evolution, Molecular Protein Binding Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolism Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/chemistry,metabolism Signal Transduction Stochastic Processes
Chemicals
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins
Authors & Affiliations
4 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Kim Philip M
Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Sboner Andrea
Xia Yu
Gerstein Mark
References (38)
38 references, click to expand
  1. Protein disorder prediction: implications for structural proteomics.
    Structure. 2003 Nov;11(11):1453-9 PMID: 14604535
  2. Still stratus not altocumulus: further evidence against the date/party hub distinction.
    PLoS Biol. 2007 Jun;5(6):e154 PMID: 17564494
  3. The Pfam protein families database.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Jan 1;30(1):276-80 PMID: 11752314
  4. What properties characterize the hub proteins of the protein-protein interaction network of Saccharomyces cerevisiae?
    Genome Biol. 2006;7(6):R45 PMID: 16780599
  5. Docking interactions in protein kinase and phosphatase networks.
    Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2006 Dec;16(6):676-85 PMID: 17079133
  6. The importance of intrinsic disorder for protein phosphorylation.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Feb 11;32(3):1037-49 PMID: 14960716
  7. Functional anthology of intrinsic disorder. 1. Biological processes and functions of proteins with long disordered regions.
    J Proteome Res. 2007 May;6(5):1882-98 PMID: 17391014
  8. The DISOPRED server for the prediction of protein disorder.
    Bioinformatics. 2004 Sep 1;20(13):2138-9 PMID: 15044227
  9. Global analysis of protein phosphorylation in yeast.
    Nature. 2005 Dec 1;438(7068):679-84 PMID: 16319894
  10. Functional discovery via a compendium of expression profiles.
    Cell. 2000 Jul 7;102(1):109-26 PMID: 10929718
  11. Evolutionary rate heterogeneity in proteins with long disordered regions.
    J Mol Evol. 2002 Jul;55(1):104-10 PMID: 12165847
  12. Role of intrinsic disorder in transient interactions of hub proteins.
    Proteins. 2007 Mar 1;66(4):761-5 PMID: 17154416
  13. Intrinsic disorder and protein function.
    Biochemistry. 2002 May 28;41(21):6573-82 PMID: 12022860
  14. Relating three-dimensional structures to protein networks provides evolutionary insights.
    Science. 2006 Dec 22;314(5807):1938-41 PMID: 17185604
  15. Comparative genomics and disorder prediction identify biologically relevant SH3 protein interactions.
    PLoS Comput Biol. 2005 Aug;1(3):e26 PMID: 16110343
  16. Intrinsic disorder is a common feature of hub proteins from four eukaryotic interactomes.
    PLoS Comput Biol. 2006 Aug 4;2(8):e100 PMID: 16884331
  17. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction-Round VII.
    Proteins. 2007;69 Suppl 8:3-9 PMID: 17918729
  18. Mechanism of coupled folding and binding of an intrinsically disordered protein.
    Nature. 2007 Jun 21;447(7147):1021-5 PMID: 17522630
  19. Disordered domains and high surface charge confer hubs with the ability to interact with multiple proteins in interaction networks.
    FEBS Lett. 2006 Apr 3;580(8):2041-5 PMID: 16542654
  20. The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes.
    BMC Bioinformatics. 2003 Sep 11;4:41 PMID: 12969510
  21. Assembly of cell regulatory systems through protein interaction domains.
    Science. 2003 Apr 18;300(5618):445-52 PMID: 12702867
  22. Intrinsic disorder and functional proteomics.
    Biophys J. 2007 Mar 1;92(5):1439-56 PMID: 17158572
  23. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization.
    Nat Rev Genet. 2004 Feb;5(2):101-13 PMID: 14735121
  24. BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 1;34(Database issue):D535-9 PMID: 16381927
  25. Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life.
    J Mol Biol. 2004 Mar 26;337(3):635-45 PMID: 15019783
  26. Stratus not altocumulus: a new view of the yeast protein interaction network.
    PLoS Biol. 2006 Oct;4(10):e317 PMID: 16984220
  27. Is the intrinsic disorder of proteins the cause of the scale-free architecture of protein-protein interaction networks?
    Proteomics. 2007 Mar;7(6):961-4 PMID: 17285562
  28. Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm.
    J Mol Biol. 1999 Oct 22;293(2):321-31 PMID: 10550212
  29. Structural systems biology: modelling protein interactions.
    Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006 Mar;7(3):188-97 PMID: 16496021
  30. A more complete, complexed and structured interactome.
    Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2007 Jun;17(3):370-7 PMID: 17574831
  31. Intrinsic disorder in cell-signaling and cancer-associated proteins.
    J Mol Biol. 2002 Oct 25;323(3):573-84 PMID: 12381310
  32. Structural determinants of the rate of protein evolution in yeast.
    Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Sep;23(9):1751-61 PMID: 16782762
  33. Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein-protein interaction network.
    Nature. 2004 Jul 1;430(6995):88-93 PMID: 15190252
  34. Mechanisms of specificity in protein phosphorylation.
    Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007 Jul;8(7):530-41 PMID: 17585314
  35. Flexible nets. The roles of intrinsic disorder in protein interaction networks.
    FEBS J. 2005 Oct;272(20):5129-48 PMID: 16218947
  36. Structures in systems biology.
    Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2007 Jun;17(3):378-84 PMID: 17574836
  37. Confirmation of organized modularity in the yeast interactome.
    PLoS Biol. 2007 Jun;5(6):e153 PMID: 17564493
  38. Local structural disorder imparts plasticity on linear motifs.
    Bioinformatics. 2007 Apr 15;23(8):950-6 PMID: 17387114
Article Info
Journal
Molecular systems biology
Abbr.
Mol Syst Biol
ISSN
1744-4292
Published
2008-00-00
Epub
2008-00-25
Pages
179
Language
English
Region
England
NLM ID
101235389
PMCID
PMC2290937
Subset
IM
Grants
NCRR NIH HHS · S10 RR019895 · United States
NCRR NIH HHS · RR19895 · United States
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com