Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 17130172 Published · ppublish English Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Validation Study

Sequence comparison by sequence harmony identifies subtype-specific functional sites.

Nucleic acids research ·Vol. 34 ·No. 22 ·2006-00-00 ·Pages 6540-8

Pirovano W, Feenstra KA, Heringa J

Abstract

Multiple sequence alignments are often used to reveal functionally important residues within a protein family. They can be particularly useful for the identification of key residues that determine functional differences between protein subfamilies. We present a new entropy-based method, Sequence Harmony (SH) that accurately detects subfamily-specific positions from a multiple sequence alignment. The SH algorithm implements a novel formula, able to score compositional differences between subfamilies, without imposing conservation, in a simple manner on an intuitive scale. We compare our method with the most important published methods, i.e. AMAS, TreeDet and SDP-pred, using three well-studied protein families: the receptor-binding domain (MH2) of the Smad family of transcription factors, the Ras-superfamily of small GTPases and the MIP-family of integral membrane transporters. We demonstrate that SH accurately selects known functional sites with higher coverage than the other methods for these test-cases. This shows that compositional differences between protein subfamilies provide sufficient basis for identification of functional sites. In addition, SH selects a number of sites of unknown function that could be interesting candidates for further experimental investigation.

MeSH Terms
Algorithms Amino Acid Sequence Entropy Membrane Transport Proteins/chemistry Sequence Alignment/methods Sequence Analysis, Protein Smad Proteins/chemistry ras Proteins/chemistry
Chemicals
Membrane Transport Proteins Smad Proteins ras Proteins
Authors & Affiliations
3 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Pirovano Walter
Centre for Integrative Bioinformatics VU (IBIVU), Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1081A, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Feenstra K Anton
Heringa Jaap
References (35)
35 references, click to expand
  1. Structural basis of Smad2 recognition by the Smad anchor for receptor activation.
    Science. 2000 Jan 7;287(5450):92-7 PMID: 10615055
  2. A two-entropies analysis to identify functional positions in the transmembrane region of class A G protein-coupled receptors.
    Proteins. 2006 Jun 1;63(4):1018-30 PMID: 16532452
  3. The Ras branch of small GTPases: Ras family members don't fall far from the tree.
    Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2000 Apr;12(2):157-65 PMID: 10712923
  4. Analysis and prediction of functional sub-types from protein sequence alignments.
    J Mol Biol. 2000 Oct 13;303(1):61-76 PMID: 11021970
  5. Structure of a glycerol-conducting channel and the basis for its selectivity.
    Science. 2000 Oct 20;290(5491):481-6 PMID: 11039922
  6. The Rab GTPase family.
    Genome Biol. 2001;2(5):REVIEWS3007 PMID: 11387043
  7. A phylogenetic framework for the aquaporin family in eukaryotes.
    J Mol Evol. 2001 May;52(5):391-404 PMID: 11443343
  8. The TGF beta receptor activation process: an inhibitor- to substrate-binding switch.
    Mol Cell. 2001 Sep;8(3):671-82 PMID: 11583628
  9. Different Smad2 partners bind a common hydrophobic pocket in Smad2 via a defined proline-rich motif.
    EMBO J. 2002 Jan 15;21(1-2):145-56 PMID: 11782434
  10. Using orthologous and paralogous proteins to identify specificity-determining residues in bacterial transcription factors.
    J Mol Biol. 2002 Aug 2;321(1):7-20 PMID: 12139929
  11. Two short segments of Smad3 are important for specific interaction of Smad3 with c-Ski and SnoN.
    J Biol Chem. 2003 Jan 3;278(1):531-6 PMID: 12426322
  12. Automatic methods for predicting functionally important residues.
    J Mol Biol. 2003 Feb 28;326(4):1289-302 PMID: 12589769
  13. The PRALINE online server: optimising progressive multiple alignment on the web.
    Comput Biol Chem. 2003 Oct;27(4-5):511-9 PMID: 14642759
  14. Automated selection of positions determining functional specificity of proteins by comparative analysis of orthologous groups in protein families.
    Protein Sci. 2004 Feb;13(2):443-56 PMID: 14739328
  15. Prediction of protein function from protein sequence and structure.
    Q Rev Biophys. 2003 Aug;36(3):307-40 PMID: 15029827
  16. A family of evolution-entropy hybrid methods for ranking protein residues by importance.
    J Mol Biol. 2004 Mar 5;336(5):1265-82 PMID: 15037084
  17. Smad2 phosphorylation by type I receptor: contribution of arginine 462 and cysteine 463 In the C terminus of Smad2 for specificity.
    J Biol Chem. 2004 Aug 20;279(34):35781-7 PMID: 15210694
  18. Information-theoretical entropy as a measure of sequence variability.
    Proteins. 1991;11(4):297-313 PMID: 1758884
  19. Distinct structural elements of rab5 define its functional specificity.
    EMBO J. 1994 Feb 1;13(3):575-83 PMID: 8313902
  20. An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families.
    J Mol Biol. 1996 Mar 29;257(2):342-58 PMID: 8609628
  21. Identification of functional residues and secondary structure from protein multiple sequence alignment.
    Methods Enzymol. 1996;266:497-512 PMID: 8743702
  22. Using substitution probabilities to improve position-specific scoring matrices.
    Comput Appl Biosci. 1996 Apr;12(2):135-43 PMID: 8744776
  23. The L3 loop: a structural motif determining specific interactions between SMAD proteins and TGF-beta receptors.
    EMBO J. 1998 Feb 16;17(4):996-1005 PMID: 9463378
  24. Identification of class-determining residues in G protein-coupled receptors by sequence analysis.
    Receptors Channels. 1997;5(3-4):159-74 PMID: 9606720
  25. Determinants of specificity in TGF-beta signal transduction.
    Genes Dev. 1998 Jul 15;12(14):2144-52 PMID: 9679059
  26. Smad1 recognition and activation by the ALK1 group of transforming growth factor-beta family receptors.
    J Biol Chem. 1999 Feb 5;274(6):3672-7 PMID: 9920917
  27. Effector recognition by the small GTP-binding proteins Ras and Ral.
    J Biol Chem. 1999 Jun 18;274(25):17763-70 PMID: 10364219
  28. Accurate detection of very sparse sequence motifs.
    J Comput Biol. 2004;11(5):843-57 PMID: 15700405
  29. PRALINE: a multiple sequence alignment toolbox that integrates homology-extended and secondary structure information.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Jul 1;33(Web Server issue):W289-94 PMID: 15980472
  30. Predicting specificity-determining residues in two large eukaryotic transcription factor families.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33(14):4455-65 PMID: 16085755
  31. Specificity and versatility in tgf-beta signaling through Smads.
    Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2005;21:659-93 PMID: 16212511
  32. Smad transcription factors.
    Genes Dev. 2005 Dec 1;19(23):2783-810 PMID: 16322555
  33. Pfam: clans, web tools and services.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 1;34(Database issue):D247-51 PMID: 16381856
  34. Large-scale sequence analysis of avian influenza isolates.
    Science. 2006 Mar 17;311(5767):1576-80 PMID: 16439620
  35. Homeodomain and winged-helix transcription factors recruit activated Smads to distinct promoter elements via a common Smad interaction motif.
    Genes Dev. 2000 Feb 15;14(4):435-51 PMID: 10691736
Article Info
Journal
Nucleic acids research
Abbr.
Nucleic Acids Res
ISSN
1362-4962
Published
2006-00-00
Epub
2006-00-27
Pages
6540-8
Language
English
Region
England
NLM ID
0411011
PMCID
PMC1702503
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com