Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 16790077 Published · ppublish English Clinical Trial Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

The effect of the stromal component of breast tumours on prediction of clinical outcome using gene expression microarray analysis.

Breast cancer research : BCR ·Vol. 8 ·No. 3 ·2006-00-00 ·Pages R32

Cleator SJ, Powles TJ, Dexter T, Fulford L, Mackay A, Smith IE, Valgeirsson H, Ashworth A, Dowsett M

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of the cellular composition of biopsies on the error rates of multigene predictors of response of breast tumours to neoadjuvant adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (AC) chemotherapy. Core biopsies were taken from primary breast tumours of 43 patients prior to AC, and subsequent clinical response was recorded. Post-chemotherapy (day 21) samples were available for 16 of these samples. Frozen sections of each core were used to estimate the proportion of invasive cancer and other tissue components at three levels. Transcriptional profiling was performed using a cDNA array containing 4,600 elements. Twenty-three (53%) patients demonstrated a 'good' and 20 (47%) a 'poor' clinical response. The percentage invasive tumour in core biopsies collected from these patients varied markedly. Despite this, agglomerative clustering of sample expression profiles showed that almost all biopsies from the same tumour aggregated as nearest neighbours. SAM (significance analysis of microarrays) regression analysis identified 144 genes which distinguished high- and low-percentage invasive tumour biopsies at a false discovery rate of not more than 5%. The misclassification error of prediction of clinical response using microarray data from pre-treatment biopsies (on leave-one-out cross-validation) was 28%. When prediction was performed on subsets of samples which were more homogeneous in their proportions of malignant and stromal cells, the misclassification error was considerably lower (8%-13%, p < 0.05 on permutation). The non-tumour content of breast cancer samples has a significant effect on gene expression profiles. Consideration of this factor improves accuracy of response prediction by expression array profiling. Future gene expression array prediction studies should be planned taking this into account.

MeSH Terms
Adult Aged Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage Biopsy Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy,genetics,pathology Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage DNA, Complementary/analysis Doxorubicin/administration & dosage Female Gene Expression Profiling Humans Middle Aged Neoadjuvant Therapy Predictive Value of Tests Prognosis Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Stromal Cells Treatment Outcome
Chemicals
DNA, Complementary Doxorubicin Cyclophosphamide
Authors & Affiliations
9 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Cleator Susan J
Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, SW3 6JB, London, UK. s.cleator@imperial.ac.uk
Powles Trevor J
Dexter Tim
Fulford Laura
Mackay Alan
Smith Ian E
Valgeirsson Haukur
Ashworth Alan
Dowsett Mitch
Supplementary Concepts
AC protocol (Protocol)
References (34)
34 references, click to expand
  1. The desmoplastic response to infiltrating breast carcinoma: gene expression at the site of primary invasion and implications for comparisons between tumor types.
    Cancer Res. 2002 Sep 15;62(18):5351-7 PMID: 12235006
  2. Intrinsic multidrug class 1 and 2 gene expression and localization in rat and human mammary tumors.
    Lab Invest. 1996 Sep;75(3):413-26 PMID: 8804364
  3. The Nottingham Prognostic Index in primary breast cancer.
    Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1992;22(3):207-19 PMID: 1391987
  4. Changes in gene expression associated with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.
    J Clin Oncol. 2005 May 20;23(15):3331-42 PMID: 15908647
  5. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.
    Nature. 2000 Aug 17;406(6797):747-52 PMID: 10963602
  6. Estrogen receptor status in breast cancer is associated with remarkably distinct gene expression patterns.
    Cancer Res. 2001 Aug 15;61(16):5979-84 PMID: 11507038
  7. Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer.
    Nature. 2002 Jan 31;415(6871):530-6 PMID: 11823860
  8. Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer: nine-year results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18.
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2001;(30):96-102 PMID: 11773300
  9. Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jul 8;100(14):8418-23 PMID: 12829800
  10. Gene expression profiling for molecular characterization of inflammatory breast cancer and prediction of response to chemotherapy.
    Cancer Res. 2004 Dec 1;64(23):8558-65 PMID: 15574762
  11. Breast cancer classification and prognosis based on gene expression profiles from a population-based study.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Sep 2;100(18):10393-8 PMID: 12917485
  12. Molecular profiling of breast cancer: clinical implications.
    Br J Cancer. 2004 Mar 22;90(6):1120-4 PMID: 15026788
  13. A critical evaluation of the mechanisms of action proposed for the antitumor effects of the anthracycline antibiotics adriamycin and daunorubicin.
    Biochem Pharmacol. 1999 Apr 1;57(7):727-41 PMID: 10075079
  14. Predicting the clinical status of human breast cancer by using gene expression profiles.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Sep 25;98(20):11462-7 PMID: 11562467
  15. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18.
    J Clin Oncol. 1997 Jul;15(7):2483-93 PMID: 9215816
  16. Prediction of docetaxel response in human breast cancer by gene expression profiling.
    J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jan 20;23(3):422-31 PMID: 15659489
  17. A paradigm for class prediction using gene expression profiles.
    J Comput Biol. 2002;9(3):505-11 PMID: 12162889
  18. Gene-expression profiles to predict distant metastasis of lymph-node-negative primary breast cancer.
    Lancet. 2005 Feb 19-25;365(9460):671-9 PMID: 15721472
  19. Population-based validation of the prognostic model ADJUVANT! for early breast cancer.
    J Clin Oncol. 2005 Apr 20;23(12):2716-25 PMID: 15837986
  20. Gene expression profiling for the prediction of therapeutic response to docetaxel in patients with breast cancer.
    Lancet. 2003 Aug 2;362(9381):362-9 PMID: 12907009
  21. Gene expression profiles predict complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant paclitaxel and fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in breast cancer.
    J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jun 15;22(12):2284-93 PMID: 15136595
  22. Predictors of primary breast cancers responsiveness to preoperative epirubicin/cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy: translation of microarray data into clinically useful predictive signatures.
    J Transl Med. 2005 Aug 09;3:32 PMID: 16091131
  23. N-myc down-regulated gene 1 modulates the response of term human trophoblasts to hypoxic injury.
    J Biol Chem. 2006 Feb 3;281(5):2764-72 PMID: 16314423
  24. A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer.
    N Engl J Med. 2002 Dec 19;347(25):1999-2009 PMID: 12490681
  25. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Apr 24;98(9):5116-21 PMID: 11309499
  26. Development and validation of a method for using breast core needle biopsies for gene expression microarray analyses.
    Clin Cancer Res. 2002 May;8(5):1155-66 PMID: 12006532
  27. Gene expression patterns for doxorubicin (Adriamycin) and cyclophosphamide (cytoxan) (AC) response and resistance.
    Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006 Feb;95(3):229-33 PMID: 16322899
  28. Good clinical response of breast cancers to neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy is associated with improved overall survival.
    Ann Oncol. 2005 Feb;16(2):267-72 PMID: 15668282
  29. In vivo gene expression profile analysis of human breast cancer progression.
    Cancer Res. 1999 Nov 15;59(22):5656-61 PMID: 10582678
  30. Gene expression profiles derived from fine needle aspiration correlate with response to systemic chemotherapy in breast cancer.
    Breast Cancer Res. 2002;4(3):R3 PMID: 12052255
  31. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Sep 11;98(19):10869-74 PMID: 11553815
  32. Pre-B cell colony-enhancing factor inhibits neutrophil apoptosis in experimental inflammation and clinical sepsis.
    J Clin Invest. 2004 May;113(9):1318-27 PMID: 15124023
  33. Gene expression profile associated with response to doxorubicin-based therapy in breast cancer.
    Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Oct 15;11(20):7434-43 PMID: 16243817
  34. Expression of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 and type IV collagenase/gelatinase messenger RNAs in human breast cancer.
    Hum Pathol. 1997 Mar;28(3):359-66 PMID: 9042802
Article Info
Journal
Breast cancer research : BCR
Abbr.
Breast Cancer Res
ISSN
1465-542X
Published
2006-00-00
Epub
2006-00-21
Pages
R32
Language
English
Region
England
NLM ID
100927353
PMCID
PMC1557729
Subset
IM
Grants
Breast Cancer Now · BREAST CANCER NOW RESEARCH CENTRE · United Kingdom
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com