Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 16640331 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Development of quantitative structure-binding affinity relationship models based on novel geometrical chemical descriptors of the protein-ligand interfaces.

Journal of medicinal chemistry ·Vol. 49 ·No. 9 ·2006-05-04 ·Pages 2713-24

Zhang S, Golbraikh A, Tropsha A

Abstract

Novel geometrical chemical descriptors have been derived on the basis of the computational geometry of protein-ligand interfaces and Pauling atomic electronegativities (EN). Delaunay tessellation has been applied to a diverse set of 517 X-ray characterized protein-ligand complexes yielding a unique collection of interfacial nearest neighbor atomic quadruplets for each complex. Each quadruplet composition was characterized by a single descriptor calculated as the sum of the EN values for the four participating atom types. We termed these simple descriptors generated from atomic EN values and derived with the Delaunay Tessellation the ENTess descriptors and used them in the variable selection k-nearest neighbor quantitative structure-binding affinity relationship (QSBR) studies of 264 diverse protein-ligand complexes with known binding constants. Twenty-four complexes with chemically dissimilar ligands were set aside as an independent validation set, and the remaining dataset of 240 complexes was divided into multiple training and test sets. The best models were characterized by the leave-one-out cross-validated correlation coefficient q(2) as high as 0.66 for the training set and the correlation coefficient R(2) as high as 0.83 for the test set. The high predictive power of these models was confirmed independently by applying them to the validation set of 24 complexes yielding R(2) as high as 0.85. We conclude that QSBR models built with the ENTess descriptors can be instrumental for predicting the binding affinity of receptor-ligand complexes.

MeSH Terms
Computer Simulation Crystallography, X-Ray Ligands Models, Biological Models, Molecular Protein Structure, Tertiary Proteins/chemistry,classification,genetics,metabolism Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship
Chemicals
Ligands Proteins
Authors & Affiliations
3 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Zhang Shuxing
The Laboratory for Molecular Modeling, Division of Medicinal Chemistry and Natural Products, School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7360, USA.
Golbraikh Alexander
Tropsha Alexander
References (70)
70 references, click to expand
  1. Construction of high-quality structure-property-activity regressions: the boiling points of sulfides
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2000 Jul;40(4):899-905 PMID: 10955516
  2. Delaunay tessellation of proteins: four body nearest-neighbor propensities of amino acid residues.
    J Comput Biol. 1996 Summer;3(2):213-21 PMID: 8811483
  3. Modeling antimalarial activity: application of Kinetic Energy Density Quantum Similarity Measures as descriptors in QSAR.
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2000 Nov-Dec;40(6):1400-7 PMID: 11128098
  4. Comparative binding energy analysis of HIV-1 protease inhibitors: incorporation of solvent effects and validation as a powerful tool in receptor-based drug design.
    J Med Chem. 1998 Mar 12;41(6):836-52 PMID: 9526559
  5. Three-dimensional quantitative structure activity relationships (3-D-QSAR) of antihyperglycemic agents.
    Bioorg Med Chem. 1999 Jul;7(7):1475-85 PMID: 10465422
  6. SMall Molecule Growth 2001 (SMoG2001): an improved knowledge-based scoring function for protein-ligand interactions.
    J Med Chem. 2002 Jun 20;45(13):2770-80 PMID: 12061879
  7. The PDBbind database: collection of binding affinities for protein-ligand complexes with known three-dimensional structures.
    J Med Chem. 2004 Jun 3;47(12):2977-80 PMID: 15163179
  8. Subnanomolar Inhibitors from Computer Screening: A Model Study Using Human Carbonic Anhydrase II.
    Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2001 Jan 19;40(2):389-393 PMID: 11180334
  9. Improved QSARs for predictive toxicology of halogenated hydrocarbons.
    Comput Chem. 2000 May;24(3-4):421-7 PMID: 10816012
  10. Statistical geometry analysis of proteins: implications for inverted structure prediction.
    Pac Symp Biocomput. 1996;:614-23 PMID: 9390262
  11. Crystal structures of recombinant human dihydrofolate reductase complexed with folate and 5-deazafolate.
    Biochemistry. 1990 Oct 9;29(40):9467-79 PMID: 2248959
  12. Computational methods to predict binding free energy in ligand-receptor complexes.
    J Med Chem. 1995 Dec 22;38(26):4953-67 PMID: 8544170
  13. A priori prediction of activity for HIV-1 protease inhibitors employing energy minimization in the active site.
    J Med Chem. 1995 Jan 20;38(2):305-17 PMID: 7830273
  14. Anatomy of a proficient enzyme: the structure of orotidine 5'-monophosphate decarboxylase in the presence and absence of a potential transition state analog.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Feb 29;97(5):2011-6 PMID: 10681417
  15. Predicting protein-ligand binding affinities using novel geometrical descriptors and machine-learning methods.
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2004 Mar-Apr;44(2):699-703 PMID: 15032552
  16. Four-body potentials reveal protein-specific correlations to stability changes caused by hydrophobic core mutations.
    J Mol Biol. 2001 Aug 24;311(4):625-38 PMID: 11518520
  17. Novel inhibitors of DNA gyrase: 3D structure based biased needle screening, hit validation by biophysical methods, and 3D guided optimization. A promising alternative to random screening.
    J Med Chem. 2000 Jul 13;43(14):2664-74 PMID: 10893304
  18. Predictive QSAR modeling based on diversity sampling of experimental datasets for the training and test set selection.
    J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2002 May-Jun;16(5-6):357-69 PMID: 12489684
  19. Slow- and fast-binding inhibitors of thermolysin display different modes of binding: crystallographic analysis of extended phosphonamidate transition-state analogues.
    Biochemistry. 1987 Dec 29;26(26):8542-53 PMID: 3442675
  20. Prediction of mutagenicity utilizing a hierarchical QSAR approach.
    SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2001;12(6):481-96 PMID: 11813801
  21. Quantitative structure-antitumor activity relationships of camptothecin analogues: cluster analysis and genetic algorithm-based studies.
    J Med Chem. 2001 Sep 27;44(20):3254-63 PMID: 11563924
  22. Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins.
    J Am Chem Soc. 1988 Aug 1;110(18):5959-67 PMID: 22148765
  23. The Protein Data Bank.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jan 1;28(1):235-42 PMID: 10592235
  24. Prediction of ligand-receptor binding thermodynamics by free energy force field (FEFF) 3D-QSAR analysis: application to a set of peptidometic renin inhibitors.
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 1997 Jul-Aug;37(4):792-811 PMID: 9254912
  25. BIND: the Biomolecular Interaction Network Database.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jan 1;31(1):248-50 PMID: 12519993
  26. Novel ZE-isomerism descriptors derived from molecular topology and their application to QSAR analysis.
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2002 Jul-Aug;42(4):769-87 PMID: 12132878
  27. Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions.
    Proteins. 2002 Jun 1;47(4):409-43 PMID: 12001221
  28. Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking.
    J Med Chem. 2003 Jun 5;46(12):2287-303 PMID: 12773034
  29. Quantitative structure-permeability relationships (QSPRs) for percutaneous absorption.
    Toxicol In Vitro. 2002 Jun;16(3):299-317 PMID: 12020604
  30. Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes.
    J Comput Aided Mol Des. 1997 Sep;11(5):425-45 PMID: 9385547
  31. Diverse viewpoints on computational aspects of molecular diversity.
    J Comb Chem. 2001 May-Jun;3(3):231-50 PMID: 11350246
  32. Inhibition of p38 MAP kinase by utilizing a novel allosteric binding site.
    Nat Struct Biol. 2002 Apr;9(4):268-72 PMID: 11896401
  33. Statistical potentials and scoring functions applied to protein-ligand binding.
    Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2001 Apr;11(2):231-5 PMID: 11297933
  34. A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm.
    J Mol Biol. 1996 Aug 23;261(3):470-89 PMID: 8780787
  35. Chelation of serine 39 to Mg2+ latches a gate at the active site of enolase: structure of the bis(Mg2+) complex of yeast enolase and the intermediate analog phosphonoacetohydroxamate at 2.1-A resolution.
    Biochemistry. 1994 Aug 9;33(31):9333-42 PMID: 8049235
  36. Relibase: design and development of a database for comprehensive analysis of protein-ligand interactions.
    J Mol Biol. 2003 Feb 14;326(2):607-20 PMID: 12559926
  37. Classification of environmental estrogens by physicochemical properties using principal component analysis and hierarchical cluster analysis.
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2001 May-Jun;41(3):718-26 PMID: 11410051
  38. Development and current status of the CHARMM force field for nucleic acids.
    Biopolymers. 2000-2001;56(4):257-65 PMID: 11754339
  39. The importance of hydrophobicity and electrophilicity descriptors in mechanistically-based QSARs for toxicological endpoints.
    SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2002 Mar;13(1):167-76 PMID: 12074385
  40. Quantitative structure-activity relationships of mutagenic and carcinogenic aromatic amines.
    Chem Rev. 2000 Oct 11;100(10):3697-714 PMID: 11749325
  41. Crystal structures of metyrapone- and phenylimidazole-inhibited complexes of cytochrome P-450cam.
    Biochemistry. 1987 Dec 15;26(25):8165-74 PMID: 3442650
  42. Solution structure of a peptide derived from the beta subunit of LFA-1.
    Peptides. 2003 Jun;24(6):827-35 PMID: 12948834
  43. Crystal structures of native and inhibited forms of human cathepsin D: implications for lysosomal targeting and drug design.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Jul 15;90(14):6796-800 PMID: 8393577
  44. Prediction of drug binding affinities by comparative binding energy analysis.
    J Med Chem. 1995 Jul 7;38(14):2681-91 PMID: 7629807
  45. Evaluation of the relative stability of liganded versus ligand-free protein conformations using Simplicial Neighborhood Analysis of Protein Packing (SNAPP) method.
    Proteins. 2004 Sep 1;56(4):828-38 PMID: 15281134
  46. Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions.
    J Mol Biol. 2000 Jan 14;295(2):337-56 PMID: 10623530
  47. Novel variable selection quantitative structure--property relationship approach based on the k-nearest-neighbor principle
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2000 Jan;40(1):185-94 PMID: 10661566
  48. A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach.
    J Med Chem. 1999 Mar 11;42(5):791-804 PMID: 10072678
  49. Evaluation of PMF scoring in docking weak ligands to the FK506 binding protein.
    J Med Chem. 1999 Jul 15;42(14):2498-503 PMID: 10411471
  50. Automated docking of substrates to proteins by simulated annealing.
    Proteins. 1990;8(3):195-202 PMID: 2281083
  51. Structural analysis of the inhibition of thermolysin by an active-site-directed irreversible inhibitor.
    Biochemistry. 1983 Jan 4;22(1):236-40 PMID: 6830761
  52. Three-dimensional quantitative similarity-activity relationships (3D QSiAR) from SEAL similarity matrices.
    J Med Chem. 1998 Jul 2;41(14):2553-64 PMID: 9651159
  53. Quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling of dopamine D(1) antagonists using comparative molecular field analysis, genetic algorithms-partial least-squares, and K nearest neighbor methods.
    J Med Chem. 1999 Aug 26;42(17):3217-26 PMID: 10464009
  54. Scoring functions: a view from the bench.
    J Comput Aided Mol Des. 1999 Mar;13(2):99-108 PMID: 10091117
  55. Rational selection of training and test sets for the development of validated QSAR models.
    J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2003 Feb-Apr;17(2-4):241-53 PMID: 13677490
  56. Atomic structure of FKBP-FK506, an immunophilin-immunosuppressant complex.
    Science. 1991 May 10;252(5007):839-42 PMID: 1709302
  57. E-state fields: applications to 3D QSAR.
    J Comput Aided Mol Des. 1996 Dec;10(6):513-20 PMID: 9007685
  58. Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction.
    J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2002 Jan;16(1):11-26 PMID: 12197663
  59. A new scheme for electronegativity equalization as a source of electronic descriptors: application to chemical reactivity.
    SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2002 Mar;13(2):297-305 PMID: 12071657
  60. From knowledge-based potentials to combinatorial lead design in silico.
    Acc Chem Res. 2002 May;35(5):261-9 PMID: 12020163
  61. Quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis of functionalized amino acid anticonvulsant agents using k nearest neighbor and simulated annealing PLS methods.
    J Med Chem. 2002 Jun 20;45(13):2811-23 PMID: 12061883
  62. Prediction of binding constants of protein ligands: a fast method for the prioritization of hits obtained from de novo design or 3D database search programs.
    J Comput Aided Mol Des. 1998 Jul;12(4):309-23 PMID: 9777490
  63. Structural origins of high-affinity biotin binding to streptavidin.
    Science. 1989 Jan 6;243(4887):85-8 PMID: 2911722
  64. A review of protein-small molecule docking methods.
    J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2002 Mar;16(3):151-66 PMID: 12363215
  65. Ligand-protein database: linking protein-ligand complex structures to binding data.
    J Med Chem. 2001 Oct 25;44(22):3592-8 PMID: 11606123
  66. Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship of interleukin 1-beta converting enzyme inhibitors: A comparative molecular field analysis study.
    J Med Chem. 1999 Feb 11;42(3):373-80 PMID: 9986707
  67. Ligand solvation in molecular docking.
    Proteins. 1999 Jan 1;34(1):4-16 PMID: 10336382
  68. Structure-activity relationships and response-surface analysis of nitroaromatics toxicity to the yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae).
    Chemosphere. 2002 Feb;46(7):1045-51 PMID: 11999768
  69. Beware of q2!
    J Mol Graph Model. 2002 Jan;20(4):269-76 PMID: 11858635
  70. Statistical mechanical treatment of protein conformation. I. Conformational properties of amino acids in proteins.
    Macromolecules. 1976 Jan-Feb;9(1):142-59 PMID: 1249985
Article Info
Journal
Journal of medicinal chemistry
Abbr.
J Med Chem
ISSN
0022-2623
Published
2006-05-04
Pages
2713-24
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
9716531
PMCID
PMC2773514
Subset
IM
Grants
NIGMS NIH HHS · R01 GM066940 · United States
NIGMS NIH HHS · R01 GM066940-04 · United States
NIGMS NIH HHS · GM066940 · United States
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com