Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 15632085 Published · ppublish English Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Comparative genome sequencing of Drosophila pseudoobscura: chromosomal, gene, and cis-element evolution.

Genome research ·Vol. 15 ·No. 1 ·2005-01-00 ·Pages 1-18

Richards S, Liu Y, Bettencourt BR, Hradecky P, Letovsky S, Nielsen R, Thornton K, Hubisz MJ, Chen R, Meisel RP, Couronne O, Hua S, Smith MA, Zhang P, Liu J, Bussemaker HJ, van Batenburg MF, Howells SL, Scherer SE, Sodergren E, Matthews BB, Crosby MA, Schroeder AJ, Ortiz-Barrientos D, Rives CM, Metzker ML, Muzny DM, Scott G, Steffen D, Wheeler DA, Worley KC, Havlak P, Durbin KJ, Egan A, Gill R, Hume J, Morgan MB, Miner G, Hamilton C, Huang Y, Waldron L, Verduzco D, Clerc-Blankenburg KP, Dubchak I, Noor MA, Anderson W, White KP, Clark AG, Schaeffer SW, Gelbart W, Weinstock GM, Gibbs RA

Abstract

We have sequenced the genome of a second Drosophila species, Drosophila pseudoobscura, and compared this to the genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster, a primary model organism. Throughout evolution the vast majority of Drosophila genes have remained on the same chromosome arm, but within each arm gene order has been extensively reshuffled, leading to a minimum of 921 syntenic blocks shared between the species. A repetitive sequence is found in the D. pseudoobscura genome at many junctions between adjacent syntenic blocks. Analysis of this novel repetitive element family suggests that recombination between offset elements may have given rise to many paracentric inversions, thereby contributing to the shuffling of gene order in the D. pseudoobscura lineage. Based on sequence similarity and synteny, 10,516 putative orthologs have been identified as a core gene set conserved over 25-55 million years (Myr) since the pseudoobscura/melanogaster divergence. Genes expressed in the testes had higher amino acid sequence divergence than the genome-wide average, consistent with the rapid evolution of sex-specific proteins. Cis-regulatory sequences are more conserved than random and nearby sequences between the species--but the difference is slight, suggesting that the evolution of cis-regulatory elements is flexible. Overall, a pattern of repeat-mediated chromosomal rearrangement, and high coadaptation of both male genes and cis-regulatory sequences emerges as important themes of genome divergence between these species of Drosophila.

MeSH Terms
Animals Chromosome Breakage/genetics Chromosome Inversion/genetics Chromosome Mapping/methods Chromosomes/genetics Conserved Sequence/genetics Drosophila/genetics Drosophila melanogaster/genetics Enhancer Elements, Genetic Evolution, Molecular Gene Rearrangement/genetics Genes, Insect/genetics Genetic Variation/genetics Genome Molecular Sequence Data Predictive Value of Tests Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid/genetics Sequence Analysis, DNA/methods
Authors & Affiliations
52 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Richards Stephen
Human Genome Sequencing Center and Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston Texas 77030, USA. stephenr@bcm.tmc.edu
Liu Yue
Bettencourt Brian R
Hradecky Pavel
Letovsky Stan
Nielsen Rasmus
Thornton Kevin
Hubisz Melissa J
Chen Rui
Meisel Richard P
Couronne Olivier
Hua Sujun
Smith Mark A
Zhang Peili
Liu Jing
Bussemaker Harmen J
van Batenburg Marinus F
Howells Sally L
Scherer Steven E
Sodergren Erica
Matthews Beverly B
Crosby Madeline A
Schroeder Andrew J
Ortiz-Barrientos Daniel
Rives Catharine M
Metzker Michael L
Muzny Donna M
Scott Graham
Steffen David
Wheeler David A
Worley Kim C
Havlak Paul
Durbin K James
Egan Amy
Gill Rachel
Hume Jennifer
Morgan Margaret B
Miner George
Hamilton Cerissa
Huang Yanmei
Waldron Lenée
Verduzco Daniel
Clerc-Blankenburg Kerstin P
Dubchak Inna
Noor Mohamed A F
Anderson Wyatt
White Kevin P
Clark Andrew G
Schaeffer Stephen W
Gelbart William
Weinstock George M
Gibbs Richard A
References (82)
82 references, click to expand
  1. Generation of a widespread Drosophila inversion by a transposable element.
    Science. 1999 Jul 16;285(5426):415-8 PMID: 10411506
  2. Rates of conservative and radical nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions in mammalian nuclear genes.
    J Mol Evol. 2000 Jan;50(1):56-68 PMID: 10654260
  3. Evidence for stabilizing selection in a eukaryotic enhancer element.
    Nature. 2000 Feb 3;403(6769):564-7 PMID: 10676967
  4. Are chromosomal inversions induced by transposable elements? A paradigm from the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae.
    Parassitologia. 1999 Sep;41(1-3):119-23 PMID: 10697843
  5. Using GeneWise in the Drosophila annotation experiment.
    Genome Res. 2000 Apr;10(4):547-8 PMID: 10779496
  6. The fourth chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster: interspersed euchromatic and heterochromatic domains.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 May 9;97(10):5340-5 PMID: 10779561
  7. Mobile elements and chromosomal evolution in the virilis group of Drosophila.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Oct 10;97(21):11337-42 PMID: 11016976
  8. How malleable is the eukaryotic genome? Extreme rate of chromosomal rearrangement in the genus Drosophila.
    Genome Res. 2001 Feb;11(2):230-9 PMID: 11157786
  9. Mobile elements and the genesis of microsatellites in dipterans.
    Mol Biol Evol. 2001 Mar;18(3):384-92 PMID: 11230539
  10. Integrating genomic homology into gene structure prediction.
    Bioinformatics. 2001;17 Suppl 1:S140-8 PMID: 11473003
  11. Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Oct 9;98(21):12084-8 PMID: 11593019
  12. MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software.
    Bioinformatics. 2001 Dec;17(12):1244-5 PMID: 11751241
  13. The K(A)/K(S) ratio test for assessing the protein-coding potential of genomic regions: an empirical and simulation study.
    Genome Res. 2002 Jan;12(1):198-202 PMID: 11779845
  14. Ratios of radical to conservative amino acid replacement are affected by mutational and compositional factors and may not be indicative of positive Darwinian selection.
    Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Jul;19(7):1022-5 PMID: 12082122
  15. Evidence for large domains of similarly expressed genes in the Drosophila genome.
    J Biol. 2002;1(1):5 PMID: 12144710
  16. Chromosomal clustering of muscle-expressed genes in Caenorhabditis elegans.
    Nature. 2002 Aug 29;418(6901):975-9 PMID: 12214599
  17. Comparative genome and proteome analysis of Anopheles gambiae and Drosophila melanogaster.
    Science. 2002 Oct 4;298(5591):149-59 PMID: 12364792
  18. Retroposed new genes out of the X in Drosophila.
    Genome Res. 2002 Dec;12(12):1854-9 PMID: 12466289
  19. Strategies and tools for whole-genome alignments.
    Genome Res. 2003 Jan;13(1):73-80 PMID: 12529308
  20. AVID: A global alignment program.
    Genome Res. 2003 Jan;13(1):97-102 PMID: 12529311
  21. Human-mouse alignments with BLASTZ.
    Genome Res. 2003 Jan;13(1):103-7 PMID: 12529312
  22. Finishing a whole-genome shotgun: release 3 of the Drosophila melanogaster euchromatic genome sequence.
    Genome Biol. 2002;3(12):RESEARCH0079 PMID: 12537568
  23. Annotation of the Drosophila melanogaster euchromatic genome: a systematic review.
    Genome Biol. 2002;3(12):RESEARCH0083 PMID: 12537572
  24. Assessing the impact of comparative genomic sequence data on the functional annotation of the Drosophila genome.
    Genome Biol. 2002;3(12):RESEARCH0086 PMID: 12537575
  25. Coexpression of neighboring genes in Caenorhabditis elegans is mostly due to operons and duplicate genes.
    Genome Res. 2003 Feb;13(2):238-43 PMID: 12566401
  26. Phylogenetic shadowing of primate sequences to find functional regions of the human genome.
    Science. 2003 Feb 28;299(5611):1391-4 PMID: 12610304
  27. LAGAN and Multi-LAGAN: efficient tools for large-scale multiple alignment of genomic DNA.
    Genome Res. 2003 Apr;13(4):721-31 PMID: 12654723
  28. The foldback-like transposon Galileo is involved in the generation of two different natural chromosomal inversions of Drosophila buzzatii.
    Mol Biol Evol. 2003 May;20(5):674-85 PMID: 12679549
  29. Accumulating postzygotic isolation genes in parapatry: a new twist on chromosomal speciation.
    Evolution. 2003 Mar;57(3):447-59 PMID: 12703935
  30. Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements.
    Nature. 2003 May 15;423(6937):241-54 PMID: 12748633
  31. Human and mouse genomic sequences reveal extensive breakpoint reuse in mammalian evolution.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jun 24;100(13):7672-7 PMID: 12810957
  32. Evolutionary genomics of inversions in Drosophila pseudoobscura: evidence for epistasis.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jul 8;100(14):8319-24 PMID: 12824467
  33. Temporal patterns of fruit fly (Drosophila) evolution revealed by mutation clocks.
    Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Jan;21(1):36-44 PMID: 12949132
  34. The distribution of transposable elements within and between chromosomes in a population of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Inferences on the nature of selection against elements.
    Genet Res. 1992 Oct;60(2):115-30 PMID: 1334900
  35. The role of the transposable element hobo in the origin of endemic inversions in wild populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Genetica. 1992;86(1-3):113-26 PMID: 1334904
  36. The genome sequence of Caenorhabditis briggsae: a platform for comparative genomics.
    PLoS Biol. 2003 Nov;1(2):E45 PMID: 14624247
  37. Conservation of regulatory elements between two species of Drosophila.
    BMC Bioinformatics. 2003 Nov 20;4:57 PMID: 14629780
  38. Are radical and conservative substitution rates useful statistics in molecular evolution?
    J Mol Evol. 2003 Oct;57(4):467-78 PMID: 14708579
  39. Gene synteny and evolution of genome architecture in trypanosomatids.
    Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2004 Apr;134(2):183-91 PMID: 15003838
  40. The Atlas genome assembly system.
    Genome Res. 2004 Apr;14(4):721-32 PMID: 15060016
  41. Prediction of similarly acting cis-regulatory modules by subsequence profiling and comparative genomics in Drosophila melanogaster and D.pseudoobscura.
    Bioinformatics. 2004 Nov 1;20(16):2738-50 PMID: 15145800
  42. Computational identification of developmental enhancers: conservation and function of transcription factor binding-site clusters in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Genome Biol. 2004;5(9):R61 PMID: 15345045
  43. Y chromosome of D. pseudoobscura is not homologous to the ancestral Drosophila Y.
    Science. 2005 Jan 7;307(5706):108-10 PMID: 15528405
  44. CLUSTAL V: improved software for multiple sequence alignment.
    Comput Appl Biosci. 1992 Apr;8(2):189-91 PMID: 1591615
  45. Inversions in the Third Chromosome of Wild Races of Drosophila Pseudoobscura, and Their Use in the Study of the History of the Species.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1936 Jul;22(7):448-50 PMID: 16577723
  46. Evidence for Extensive Genetic Differentiation between the Sex-Ratio and the Standard Arrangement of DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA and D. PERSIMILIS and Identification of Hybrid Sterility Factors.
    Genetics. 1983 Sep;105(1):71-86 PMID: 17246158
  47. A New Method for the Study of Chromosome Aberrations and the Plotting of Chromosome Maps in Drosophila Melanogaster.
    Genetics. 1934 May;19(3):175-88 PMID: 17246718
  48. Salivary Gland Chromosomes in the Two Races of Drosophila Pseudoobscura.
    Genetics. 1935 Jul;20(4):392-402 PMID: 17246768
  49. The Relations of Inversions in the X Chromosome of Drosophila Melanogaster to Crossing over and Disjunction.
    Genetics. 1936 Sep;21(5):554-604 PMID: 17246812
  50. The Homologies of the Chromosome Elements in the Genus Drosophila.
    Genetics. 1941 Sep;26(5):517-41 PMID: 17247021
  51. Genetics of natural populations; experiments on chromosomes of Drosophila pseudoobscura from different geographic regions.
    Genetics. 1948 Nov;33(6):588-602 PMID: 18100290
  52. Genetics of natural populations; altitudinal and seasonal changes produced by natural selection in certain populations of Drosophila persimilis.
    Genetics. 1948 Mar;33(2):158-76 PMID: 18856563
  53. Chromosome variation in Drosophila athabasca.
    Genetics. 1946 Sep;31:508-24 PMID: 20998139
  54. Genetics of natural populations; experimental reproduction of some of the changes caused by natural selection in certain populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Genetics. 1946 Mar;31:125-56 PMID: 21021044
  55. Basic local alignment search tool.
    J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403-10 PMID: 2231712
  56. Intrachromosomal rearrangements mediated by hobo transposons in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Dec;85(23):9153-7 PMID: 2848256
  57. ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTS.
    Evolution. 1989 Jan;43(1):223-225 PMID: 28568501
  58. Mobilization of hobo elements residing within the decapentaplegic gene complex: suggestion of a new hybrid dysgenesis system in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Cell. 1987 May 22;49(4):497-505 PMID: 3032458
  59. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.
    Mol Biol Evol. 1987 Jul;4(4):406-25 PMID: 3447015
  60. Ancient linkage groups and frozen accidents.
    Nature. 1973 Aug 3;244(5414):259-62 PMID: 4200792
  61. Formation of chromosome rearrangements by P factors in Drosophila.
    Genetics. 1984 Aug;107(4):657-78 PMID: 6086453
  62. DNA sequence analysis of a Drosophila foldback transposable element rearrangement.
    Mol Gen Genet. 1982;188(1):107-10 PMID: 6294476
  63. Structure of chromosomal rearrangements induced by the FB transposable element in Drosophila.
    Nature. 1984 Mar 22-28;308(5957):323-7 PMID: 6323988
  64. Lengths of chromosomal segments conserved since divergence of man and mouse.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Feb;81(3):814-8 PMID: 6583681
  65. Relationships within the melanogaster species subgroup of the genus Drosophila (Sophophora). II. Phylogenetic relationships between six species based upon polytene chromosome banding sequences.
    Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1976 May 18;193(1112):275-94 PMID: 6967
  66. Molecular characterization of the breakpoints of an inversion fixed between Drosophila melanogaster and D. subobscura.
    Genetics. 1995 Jan;139(1):321-6 PMID: 7705632
  67. Molecular phylogeny and divergence times of drosophilid species.
    Mol Biol Evol. 1995 May;12(3):391-404 PMID: 7739381
  68. Isolation and analysis of the breakpoint sequences of chromosome inversion In(3L)Payne in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Apr 12;91(8):3132-6 PMID: 8159716
  69. Genetic instability in Drosophila melanogaster mediated by hobo transposable elements.
    Genetics. 1993 Feb;133(2):315-34 PMID: 8382175
  70. Relationships in the Drosophila obscura species group, inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase II sequences.
    Mol Biol Evol. 1993 May;10(3):619-34 PMID: 8393127
  71. P1 clones from Drosophila melanogaster as markers to study the chromosomal evolution of Muller's A element in two species of the obscura group of Drosophila.
    Chromosoma. 1995 Nov;104(2):129-36 PMID: 8585990
  72. A "double adaptor" method for improved shotgun library construction.
    Anal Biochem. 1996 Apr 5;236(1):107-13 PMID: 8619474
  73. High intrinsic rate of DNA loss in Drosophila.
    Nature. 1996 Nov 28;384(6607):346-9 PMID: 8934517
  74. Chromosomal homology and molecular organization of Muller's elements D and E in the Drosophila repleta species group.
    Genetics. 1997 Feb;145(2):281-95 PMID: 9071584
  75. Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA.
    J Mol Biol. 1997 Apr 25;268(1):78-94 PMID: 9149143
  76. Functional analysis of eve stripe 2 enhancer evolution in Drosophila: rules governing conservation and change.
    Development. 1998 Mar;125(5):949-58 PMID: 9449677
  77. High rate of DNA loss in the Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis species groups.
    Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Mar;15(3):293-302 PMID: 9501496
  78. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment.
    Genome Res. 1998 Mar;8(3):175-85 PMID: 9521921
  79. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities.
    Genome Res. 1998 Mar;8(3):186-94 PMID: 9521922
  80. Hobo transposons causing chromosomal breakpoints.
    Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Jul 7;265(1402):1157-9 PMID: 9699308
  81. Models of amino acid substitution and applications to mitochondrial protein evolution.
    Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Dec;15(12):1600-11 PMID: 9866196
  82. Assessing the quality of the DNA sequence from the Human Genome Project.
    Genome Res. 1999 Jan;9(1):1-4 PMID: 9927479
Article Info
Journal
Genome research
Abbr.
Genome Res
ISSN
1088-9051
Published
2005-01-00
Pages
1-18
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
9518021
PMCID
PMC540289
Subset
IM
Grants
NIAID NIH HHS · R01 AI045402 · United States
NHGRI NIH HHS · 5 P41 HG00739 · United States
NIGMS NIH HHS · 5 R37 GM28669 · United States
NIGMS NIH HHS · R37 GM028669 · United States
NLM NIH HHS · LM007276 · United States
NLM NIH HHS · P20 LM007276 · United States
NIGMS NIH HHS · GM-64590 · United States
NIAID NIH HHS · AI-45402 · United States
NIGMS NIH HHS · R01 GM064590 · United States
NHGRI NIH HHS · 1U01 HG02570 · United States
NHGRI NIH HHS · P41 HG000739 · United States
Databases
GENBANK
AY693425
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com