Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 12853479 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Molecular mechanism of signal sequence orientation in the endoplasmic reticulum.

The EMBO journal ·Vol. 22 ·No. 14 ·2003-07-15 ·Pages 3645-53

Goder V, Spiess M

Abstract

We have analyzed in vivo how model signal sequences are inserted and oriented in the membrane during cotranslational integration into the endoplasmic reticulum. The results are incompatible with the current models of retention of positive flanking charges or loop insertion of the polypeptide into the translocon. Instead they indicate that these N-terminal signals initially insert head-on with a cytoplasmic C-terminus before they invert their orientation to translocate the C-terminus. The rate of inversion increases with more positive N-terminal charge and is reduced with increasing hydrophobicity of the signal. Inversion may proceed for up to approximately 50 s, when it is terminated by a signal-independent process. These findings provide a mechanism for the topogenic effects of flanking charges as well as of signal hydrophobicity.

MeSH Terms
Animals COS Cells Chlorocebus aethiops Endoplasmic Reticulum/metabolism Glycosylation Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions Intracellular Membranes/metabolism Kinetics Membrane Proteins/chemistry,genetics,metabolism Models, Biological Molecular Sequence Data Protein Conformation Protein Processing, Post-Translational Protein Sorting Signals/genetics Protein Structure, Tertiary Recombinant Fusion Proteins/chemistry,metabolism Static Electricity Time Factors
Chemicals
Membrane Proteins Protein Sorting Signals Recombinant Fusion Proteins
Authors & Affiliations
2 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Goder Veit
Biozentrum, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 70, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Spiess Martin
References (44)
44 references, click to expand
  1. Role of NH2-terminal positively charged residues in establishing membrane protein topology.
    J Biol Chem. 1993 Sep 5;268(25):19101-9 PMID: 8103052
  2. A comparison of the yeast and rabbit 80 S ribosome reveals the topology of the nascent chain exit tunnel, inter-subunit bridges and mammalian rRNA expansion segments.
    J Mol Biol. 2000 Aug 11;301(2):301-21 PMID: 10926511
  3. A posttargeting signal sequence recognition event in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane.
    Cell. 1995 Jul 28;82(2):261-70 PMID: 7628015
  4. Functions of signal and signal-anchor sequences are determined by the balance between the hydrophobic segment and the N-terminal charge.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jan 1;89(1):16-9 PMID: 1729684
  5. Oligomeric rings of the Sec61p complex induced by ligands required for protein translocation.
    Cell. 1996 Nov 15;87(4):721-32 PMID: 8929540
  6. Topology of eukaryotic type II membrane proteins: importance of N-terminal positively charged residues flanking the hydrophobic domain.
    Cell. 1991 Feb 22;64(4):777-87 PMID: 1997206
  7. Pause transfer: a topogenic sequence in apolipoprotein B mediates stopping and restarting of translocation.
    Cell. 1992 Jan 10;68(1):9-21 PMID: 1370657
  8. Empty site forms of the SRP54 and SR alpha GTPases mediate targeting of ribosome-nascent chain complexes to the endoplasmic reticulum.
    Cell. 1997 May 30;89(5):703-13 PMID: 9182758
  9. Evolutionary conservation of components of the protein translocation complex.
    Nature. 1994 Feb 17;367(6464):654-7 PMID: 8107851
  10. Distinct modes of signal recognition particle interaction with the ribosome.
    Science. 2002 Aug 23;297(5585):1345-8 PMID: 12193787
  11. The distribution of positively charged residues in bacterial inner membrane proteins correlates with the trans-membrane topology.
    EMBO J. 1986 Nov;5(11):3021-7 PMID: 16453726
  12. Replacement of insulin receptor tyrosine residues 1162 and 1163 compromises insulin-stimulated kinase activity and uptake of 2-deoxyglucose.
    Cell. 1986 Jun 6;45(5):721-32 PMID: 3518947
  13. Crystal structure of the ribonucleoprotein core of the signal recognition particle.
    Science. 2000 Feb 18;287(5456):1232-9 PMID: 10678824
  14. Glycosylation can influence topogenesis of membrane proteins and reveals dynamic reorientation of nascent polypeptides within the translocon.
    J Cell Biol. 1999 Oct 18;147(2):257-66 PMID: 10525533
  15. The 70 carboxyl-terminal amino acids of nascent secretory proteins are protected from proteolysis by the ribosome and the protein translocation apparatus of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane.
    J Biol Chem. 1995 Mar 17;270(11):6170-80 PMID: 7890751
  16. Oligomeric complexes involved in translocation of proteins across the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum.
    FEBS Lett. 1999 Sep 3;457(3):316-22 PMID: 10471800
  17. Reciprocal stimulation of GTP hydrolysis by two directly interacting GTPases.
    Science. 1995 Sep 8;269(5229):1422-4 PMID: 7660124
  18. The 54-kD protein of signal recognition particle contains a methionine-rich RNA binding domain.
    J Cell Biol. 1990 Nov;111(5 Pt 1):1793-802 PMID: 1699948
  19. Evidence for the loop model of signal-sequence insertion into the endoplasmic reticulum.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Oct;85(20):7592-6 PMID: 2845415
  20. The role of the hydrophobic domain in orienting natural signal sequences within the ER membrane.
    Exp Cell Res. 1998 May 25;241(1):181-5 PMID: 9633526
  21. Sec61p is adjacent to nascent type I and type II signal-anchor proteins during their membrane insertion.
    J Cell Biol. 1993 May;121(4):743-50 PMID: 8491769
  22. Multiple determinants direct the orientation of signal-anchor proteins: the topogenic role of the hydrophobic signal domain.
    J Cell Biol. 1997 May 5;137(3):555-62 PMID: 9151664
  23. Predicting the orientation of eukaryotic membrane-spanning proteins.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Aug;86(15):5786-90 PMID: 2762295
  24. Analysis of protein topology in the endoplasmic reticulum.
    Methods Cell Biol. 1991;34:287-302 PMID: 1943805
  25. The role of the N region in signal sequence and signal-anchor function.
    J Biol Chem. 1992 Apr 15;267(11):7761-9 PMID: 1560010
  26. GTP binding and hydrolysis by the signal recognition particle during initiation of protein translocation.
    Nature. 1993 Nov 25;366(6453):351-4 PMID: 8247130
  27. Transmembrane protein insertion orientation in yeast depends on the charge difference across transmembrane segments, their total hydrophobicity, and its distribution.
    J Biol Chem. 1998 Sep 18;273(38):24963-71 PMID: 9733804
  28. The signal recognition particle.
    Annu Rev Biochem. 2001;70:755-75 PMID: 11395422
  29. The methionine-rich domain of the 54 kDa subunit of signal recognition particle is sufficient for the interaction with signal sequences.
    EMBO J. 1992 Apr;11(4):1543-51 PMID: 1314169
  30. The protein-conducting channel in the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum is open laterally toward the lipid bilayer.
    Cell. 1995 Apr 21;81(2):207-14 PMID: 7736572
  31. Transmembrane orientation of signal-anchor proteins is affected by the folding state but not the size of the N-terminal domain.
    EMBO J. 1995 Dec 15;14(24):6311-7 PMID: 8557050
  32. Heads or tails--what determines the orientation of proteins in the membrane.
    FEBS Lett. 1995 Aug 1;369(1):76-9 PMID: 7641889
  33. Signal sequence recognition in cotranslational translocation by protein components of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane.
    J Cell Biol. 1998 Jul 27;142(2):355-64 PMID: 9679136
  34. Anionic phospholipids are determinants of membrane protein topology.
    EMBO J. 1997 Jul 16;16(14):4261-6 PMID: 9250669
  35. Signal sequence recognition and protein targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane.
    Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1994;10:87-119 PMID: 7888184
  36. Role of Sec61alpha in the regulated transfer of the ribosome-nascent chain complex from the signal recognition particle to the translocation channel.
    Cell. 2000 Feb 4;100(3):333-43 PMID: 10676815
  37. Translational control in mammalian cells.
    Annu Rev Biochem. 1991;60:717-55 PMID: 1883206
  38. The topogenic contribution of uncharged amino acids on signal sequence orientation in the endoplasmic reticulum.
    J Biol Chem. 2000 May 19;275(20):14916-22 PMID: 10747915
  39. In vivo kinetics of protein targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum determined by site-specific phosphorylation.
    EMBO J. 2000 Dec 15;19(24):6704-12 PMID: 11118205
  40. Crystal structure of the signal sequence binding subunit of the signal recognition particle.
    Cell. 1998 Jul 24;94(2):181-91 PMID: 9695947
  41. Distant downstream sequence determinants can control N-tail translocation during protein insertion into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane.
    J Biol Chem. 2000 Mar 3;275(9):6207-13 PMID: 10692414
  42. Charged residues are major determinants of the transmembrane orientation of a signal-anchor sequence.
    J Biol Chem. 1991 Jan 15;266(2):973-8 PMID: 1985975
  43. GTP hydrolysis by complexes of the signal recognition particle and the signal recognition particle receptor.
    J Cell Biol. 1993 Nov;123(4):799-807 PMID: 8227141
  44. The methionine-rich domain of the 54 kd protein subunit of the signal recognition particle contains an RNA binding site and can be crosslinked to a signal sequence.
    EMBO J. 1990 Dec;9(13):4511-7 PMID: 1702385
Article Info
Journal
The EMBO journal
Abbr.
EMBO J
ISSN
0261-4189
Published
2003-07-15
Pages
3645-53
Language
English
Region
England
NLM ID
8208664
PMCID
PMC165631
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com