Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 10852944 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Stochastic focusing: fluctuation-enhanced sensitivity of intracellular regulation.

Paulsson J, Berg OG, Ehrenberg M

Abstract

Many regulatory molecules are present in low copy numbers per cell so that significant random fluctuations emerge spontaneously. Because cell viability depends on precise regulation of key events, such signal noise has been thought to impose a threat that cells must carefully eliminate. However, the precision of control is also greatly affected by the regulatory mechanisms' capacity for sensitivity amplification. Here we show that even if signal noise reduces the capacity for sensitivity amplification of threshold mechanisms, the effect on realistic regulatory kinetics can be the opposite: stochastic focusing (SF). SF particularly exploits tails of probability distributions and can be formulated as conventional multistep sensitivity amplification where signal noise provides the degrees of freedom. When signal fluctuations are sufficiently rapid, effects of time correlations in signal-dependent rates are negligible and SF works just like conventional sensitivity amplification. This means that, quite counterintuitively, signal noise can reduce the uncertainty in regulated processes. SF is exemplified by standard hyperbolic inhibition, and all probability distributions for signal noise are first derived from underlying chemical master equations. The negative binomial is suggested as a paradigmatic distribution for intracellular kinetics, applicable to stochastic gene expression as well as simple systems with Michaelis-Menten degradation or positive feedback. SF resembles stochastic resonance in that noise facilitates signal detection in nonlinear systems, but stochastic resonance is related to how noise in threshold systems allows for detection of subthreshold signals and SF describes how fluctuations can make a gradual response mechanism work more like a threshold mechanism.

MeSH Terms
Animals Cell Physiological Phenomena Humans Models, Biological Signal Transduction Stochastic Processes
Authors & Affiliations
3 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Paulsson J
Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Biomedical Center Box 596, SE 75124 Uppsala, Sweden. Johan.Paulsson@icm.uu.se
Berg O G
Ehrenberg M
References (20)
20 references, click to expand
  1. Stochastic resonance without tuning.
    Nature. 1995 Jul 20;376(6537):236-8 PMID: 7617033
  2. Stochastic resonance. Neurons in parallel.
    Nature. 1995 Jul 20;376(6537):211-2 PMID: 7617025
  3. Stochastic mechanisms in gene expression.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Feb 4;94(3):814-9 PMID: 9023339
  4. Robustness in simple biochemical networks.
    Nature. 1997 Jun 26;387(6636):913-7 PMID: 9202124
  5. Trade-off between segregational stability and metabolic burden: a mathematical model of plasmid ColE1 replication control.
    J Mol Biol. 1998 May 29;279(1):73-88 PMID: 9636701
  6. Stochastic kinetic analysis of developmental pathway bifurcation in phage lambda-infected Escherichia coli cells.
    Genetics. 1998 Aug;149(4):1633-48 PMID: 9691025
  7. Modeling stochastic gene expression: implications for haploinsufficiency.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Dec 22;95(26):15641-6 PMID: 9861023
  8. It's a noisy business! Genetic regulation at the nanomolar scale.
    Trends Genet. 1999 Feb;15(2):65-9 PMID: 10098409
  9. Mechanoelectrical transduction assisted by Brownian motion: a role for noise in the auditory system.
    Nat Neurosci. 1998 Sep;1(5):384-8 PMID: 10196528
  10. Induced synthesis of enzymes in bacteria analyzed at the cellular level.
    Biochim Biophys Acta. 1953 Jul;11(3):383-95 PMID: 13093744
  11. Analysis of sequential reactions.
    Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1963 May 10;108:305-21 PMID: 13954410
  12. Parameter sensitivity as a criterion for evaluating and comparing the performance of biochemical systems.
    Nature. 1971 Feb 19;229(5286):542-4 PMID: 4925348
  13. Kinetic amplification of enzyme discrimination.
    Biochimie. 1975;57(5):587-95 PMID: 1182215
  14. Non-genetic individuality: chance in the single cell.
    Nature. 1976 Aug 5;262(5568):467-71 PMID: 958399
  15. A model for the statistical fluctuations of protein numbers in a microbial population.
    J Theor Biol. 1978 Apr 20;71(4):587-603 PMID: 96307
  16. An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Nov;78(11):6840-4 PMID: 6947258
  17. Amplification and adaptation in regulatory and sensory systems.
    Science. 1982 Jul 16;217(4556):220-5 PMID: 7089556
  18. Induction mechanism of a single gene molecule: stochastic or deterministic?
    Bioessays. 1992 May;14(5):341-6 PMID: 1637366
  19. Stochastic resonance and the benefits of noise: from ice ages to crayfish and SQUIDs.
    Nature. 1995 Jan 5;373(6509):33-6 PMID: 7800036
  20. Does replication-induced transcription regulate synthesis of the myriad low copy number proteins of Escherichia coli?
    Bioessays. 1995 Nov;17(11):987-97 PMID: 8526893
Article Info
Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Abbr.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
ISSN
0027-8424
Published
2000-06-20
Pages
7148-53
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
7505876
PMCID
PMC16514
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com