Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 9742921 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Review

Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: patterns of spread, the importance of hepatic resection for curative operation, and a presurgical clinical staging system.

Annals of surgery ·Vol. 228 ·No. 3 ·1998-09-00 ·Pages 385-94

Burke EC, Jarnagin WR, Hochwald SN, Pisters PW, Fong Y, Blumgart LH

Abstract

To determine the resectability rate for hilar cholangiocarcinoma, to analyze reasons for unresectability, and to devise a presurgical clinical T-staging system. Ninety patients with hilar cholangiocarcinomas seen between March 1, 1991, and April 1, 1997, were evaluated. Accurate patterns of disease progression and therapy were evaluable. Disease was staged in 87 patients using extent of ductal tumor involvement, portal vein compromise, and liver atrophy. In 21 patients, disease was deemed unresectable for cure at presentation. In 39 patients, disease was found to be unresectable at laparotomy, 23 secondary to nodal (N2) or distant metastases. Unresectability was the result of metastases in 52% and of locally advanced disease in 28%. Thirty patients (33%) had resection of all gross disease, and 25 of these (83%) had negative histologic margins. Twenty-two patients underwent partial hepatectomy. The 30-day mortality rate was 7%. Projected survival is greater than 60 months in those with a negative histologic margin, with a median follow-up of 26 months. A presurgical T-staging system allows presurgical selection for therapy, predicts partial hepatectomy, and offers an index of prognosis. In half the patients, unresectability is mainly the result of intraabdominal metastases. Presurgical imaging predicts unresectability based on local extension but is poor for assessing nodal metastases. In one third of patients, disease can be resected for cure with a long median survival. Curative resection depends on negative margins, and hepatic resection is necessary to achieve this. The T-staging system correlates with resectability, the need for hepatectomy, and overall survival.

MeSH Terms
Bile Duct Neoplasms/complications,mortality,pathology,surgery Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma/complications,mortality,pathology,secondary,surgery Humans Laparotomy Neoplasm Staging Preoperative Care Survival Rate
Authors & Affiliations
6 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Burke E C
Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York 10021, USA.
Jarnagin W R
Hochwald S N
Pisters P W
Fong Y
Blumgart L H
References (16)
16 references, click to expand
  1. Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the hilus of the liver.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1975 Feb;140(2):170-8 PMID: 1079096
  2. Carcinoma of the major intrahepatic and the extrahepatic bile ducts exclusive of the papilla of Vater.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1957 Mar;104(3):357-66 PMID: 13422156
  3. Biliary carcinoma. A review of 109 cases.
    Am J Surg. 1984 Apr;147(4):503-9 PMID: 6201078
  4. Proximal bile duct cancer. Quality of survival.
    Ann Surg. 1987 Feb;205(2):111-8 PMID: 2434042
  5. Long-term survival in carcinoma of the biliary tract. Analysis of prognostic factors in 146 resections.
    Arch Surg. 1989 Feb;124(2):248-52 PMID: 2916945
  6. Management of proximal cholangiocarcinomas by surgical resection and radiotherapy.
    Am J Surg. 1990 Jan;159(1):91-7; discussion 97-8 PMID: 1688486
  7. Outcome of radical surgery in hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
    Surgery. 1990 Jun;107(6):597-604 PMID: 2162082
  8. Improvements in survival by aggressive resections of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
    Ann Surg. 1993 Jan;217(1):20-7 PMID: 8380975
  9. Carcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts. The University of California at San Francisco experience.
    Ann Surg. 1994 Mar;219(3):267-74 PMID: 8147607
  10. Cancer statistics, 1996.
    CA Cancer J Clin. 1996 Jan-Feb;46(1):5-27 PMID: 8548526
  11. Surgical treatment in proximal bile duct cancer. A single-center experience.
    Ann Surg. 1996 Nov;224(5):628-38 PMID: 8916878
  12. Resectional surgery of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors.
    J Clin Oncol. 1997 Mar;15(3):947-54 PMID: 9060532
  13. Cholangiocarcinoma at the hepatic hilus: sonographic findings.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Apr;168(4):985-9 PMID: 9124155
  14. Staging laparoscopy with laparoscopic ultrasonography: optimizing resectability in hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancy.
    J Am Coll Surg. 1997 Jul;185(1):33-9 PMID: 9208958
  15. Tumor involvement in hepatic veins: comparison of MR imaging and US for preoperative assessment.
    Radiology. 1998 Mar;206(3):651-6 PMID: 9494482
  16. Carcinoma of the bifurcation of the hepatic ducts.
    Arch Surg. 1983 Oct;118(10):1147-51 PMID: 6615197
Article Info
Journal
Annals of surgery
Abbr.
Ann Surg
ISSN
0003-4932
Published
1998-09-00
Pages
385-94
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
0372354
PMCID
PMC1191497
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com