Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 9294192 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Compositional differences within and between eukaryotic genomes.

Karlin S, Mrázek J

Abstract

Eukaryotic genome similarity relationships are inferred using sequence information derived from large aggregates of genomic sequences. Comparisons within and between species sample sequences are based on the profile of dinucleotide relative abundance values (The profile is rho*XY = f*XY/f*Xf*Y for all XY, where f*X denotes the frequency of the nucleotide X and f*XY denotes the frequency of the dinucleotide XY, both computed from the sequence concatenated with its inverted complement). Previous studies with respect to prokaryotes and this study document that profiles of different DNA sequence samples (sample size >/=50 kb) from the same organism are generally much more similar to each other than they are to profiles from other organisms, and that closely related organisms generally have more similar profiles than do distantly related organisms. On this basis we refer to the collection (rho*XY) as the genome signature. This paper identifies rho*XY extremes and compares genome signature differences for a diverse range of eukaryotic species. Interpretations on the mechanisms maintaining these profile differences center on genome-wide replication, repair, DNA structures, and context-dependent mutational biases. It is also observed that mitochondrial genome signature differences between species parallel the corresponding nuclear genome signature differences despite large differences between corresponding mitochondrial and nuclear signatures. The genome signature differences also have implications for contrasts between rodents and other mammals, and between monocot and dicot plants, as well as providing evidence for similarities among fungi and the diversity of protists.

MeSH Terms
Animals DNA, Mitochondrial/genetics Evolution, Molecular Genome Humans Models, Genetic Species Specificity
Chemicals
DNA, Mitochondrial
Authors & Affiliations
2 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Karlin S
Department of Mathematics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2125, USA.
Mrázek J
References (18)
18 references, click to expand
  1. Chloroplast and nuclear gene sequences indicate late Pennsylvanian time for the last common ancestor of extant seed plants.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 May 24;91(11):5163-7 PMID: 8197201
  2. Pervasive CpG suppression in animal mitochondrial genomes.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Apr 26;91(9):3799-803 PMID: 8170990
  3. Computational DNA sequence analysis.
    Annu Rev Microbiol. 1994;48:619-54 PMID: 7826021
  4. Dinucleotide relative abundance extremes: a genomic signature.
    Trends Genet. 1995 Jul;11(7):283-90 PMID: 7482779
  5. Similarities and dissimilarities of phage genomes.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jun 11;93(12):5854-9 PMID: 8650182
  6. Rates of nucleotide substitution in primates and rodents and the generation-time effect hypothesis.
    Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1996 Feb;5(1):182-7 PMID: 8673286
  7. What drives codon choices in human genes?
    J Mol Biol. 1996 Oct 4;262(4):459-72 PMID: 8893856
  8. Mitochondrial DNA damage is more extensive and persists longer than nuclear DNA damage in human cells following oxidative stress.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jan 21;94(2):514-9 PMID: 9012815
  9. Compositional biases of bacterial genomes and evolutionary implications.
    J Bacteriol. 1997 Jun;179(12):3899-913 PMID: 9190805
  10. Mitochondrial DNA maintenance in vertebrates.
    Annu Rev Biochem. 1997;66:409-35 PMID: 9242913
  11. Enzymatic synthesis of deoxyribonucleic acid. VIII. Frequencies of nearest neighbor base sequences in deoxyribonucleic acid.
    J Biol Chem. 1961 Mar;236:864-75 PMID: 13790780
  12. Similarity of the general designs of protochordates and invertebrates.
    Nature. 1977 Apr 7;266(5602):533-6 PMID: 558523
  13. Predicting DNA duplex stability from the base sequence.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Jun;83(11):3746-50 PMID: 3459152
  14. Heterogeneous DNA damage and repair in the mammalian genome.
    Cancer Res. 1987 Dec 15;47(24 Pt 1):6426-36 PMID: 3315187
  15. Evolution of the genome and the genetic code: selection at the dinucleotide level by methylation and polyribonucleotide cleavage.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Jan;86(1):192-6 PMID: 2463621
  16. The endosymbiont hypothesis revisited.
    Int Rev Cytol. 1992;141:233-357 PMID: 1452433
  17. Animals and fungi are each other's closest relatives: congruent evidence from multiple proteins.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Dec 15;90(24):11558-62 PMID: 8265589
  18. Which bacterium is the ancestor of the animal mitochondrial genome?
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Dec 20;91(26):12842-6 PMID: 7809132
Article Info
Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Abbr.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
ISSN
0027-8424
Published
1997-09-16
Pages
10227-32
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
7505876
PMCID
PMC23344
Subset
IM
Grants
NIGMS NIH HHS · R01 GM010452 · United States
NIGMS NIH HHS · 2R01GM10452-33 · United States
NHGRI NIH HHS · 5R01HG00335-09 · United States
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com