Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 9144182 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Cross-validated maximum likelihood enhances crystallographic simulated annealing refinement.

Adams PD, Pannu NS, Read RJ, Brünger AT

Abstract

Recently, the target function for crystallographic refinement has been improved through a maximum likelihood analysis, which makes proper allowance for the effects of data quality, model errors, and incompleteness. The maximum likelihood target reduces the significance of false local minima during the refinement process, but it does not completely eliminate them, necessitating the use of stochastic optimization methods such as simulated annealing for poor initial models. It is shown that the combination of maximum likelihood with cross-validation, which reduces overfitting, and simulated annealing by torsion angle molecular dynamics, which simplifies the conformational search problem, results in a major improvement of the radius of convergence of refinement and the accuracy of the refined structure. Torsion angle molecular dynamics and the maximum likelihood target function interact synergistically, the combination of both methods being significantly more powerful than each method individually. This is demonstrated in realistic test cases at two typical minimum Bragg spacings (dmin = 2.0 and 2.8 A, respectively), illustrating the broad applicability of the combined method. In an application to the refinement of a new crystal structure, the combined method automatically corrected a mistraced loop in a poor initial model, moving the backbone by 4 A.

MeSH Terms
Amylases/chemistry Crystallography, X-Ray Heterogeneous-Nuclear Ribonucleoproteins Humans Least-Squares Analysis Models, Molecular Probability Protein Conformation Proteins/chemistry RNA-Binding Proteins/chemistry Reproducibility of Results Ribonucleoproteins/chemistry
Chemicals
Heterogeneous-Nuclear Ribonucleoproteins Proteins RNA-Binding Proteins Ribonucleoproteins Amylases
Authors & Affiliations
4 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Adams P D
Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Pannu N S
Read R J
Brünger A T
References (15)
15 references, click to expand
  1. Direct phase determination by entropy maximization and likelihood ranking: status report and perspectives.
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1993 Jan 1;49(Pt 1):37-60 PMID: 15299544
  2. Conformational variability in the refined structure of the chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 A resolution.
    Nat Struct Biol. 1995 Dec;2(12):1083-94 PMID: 8846220
  3. Assessment of phase accuracy by cross validation: the free R value. Methods and applications.
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1993 Jan 1;49(Pt 1):24-36 PMID: 15299543
  4. Crystal structure determination, refinement and the molecular model of the alpha-amylase inhibitor Hoe-467A.
    J Mol Biol. 1986 May 20;189(2):383-6 PMID: 3489104
  5. Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models.
    Acta Crystallogr A. 1991 Mar 1;47 ( Pt 2):110-9 PMID: 2025413
  6. Determination of three-dimensional structures of proteins from interproton distance data by hybrid distance geometry-dynamical simulated annealing calculations.
    FEBS Lett. 1988 Mar 14;229(2):317-24 PMID: 3345845
  7. Torsion angle dynamics: reduced variable conformational sampling enhances crystallographic structure refinement.
    Proteins. 1994 Aug;19(4):277-90 PMID: 7984624
  8. Molecular dynamics refinement of a thermitase-eglin-c complex at 1.98 A resolution and comparison of two crystal forms that differ in calcium content.
    J Mol Biol. 1989 Nov 20;210(2):347-67 PMID: 2689655
  9. Checking your imagination: applications of the free R value.
    Structure. 1996 Aug 15;4(8):897-904 PMID: 8805582
  10. Free R value: a novel statistical quantity for assessing the accuracy of crystal structures.
    Nature. 1992 Jan 30;355(6359):472-5 PMID: 18481394
  11. Crystal structure of the two RNA binding domains of human hnRNP A1 at 1.75 A resolution.
    Nat Struct Biol. 1997 Mar;4(3):215-22 PMID: 9164463
  12. Protein hydration observed by X-ray diffraction. Solvation properties of penicillopepsin and neuraminidase crystal structures.
    J Mol Biol. 1994 Oct 14;243(1):100-15 PMID: 7932732
  13. Crystallographic R factor refinement by molecular dynamics.
    Science. 1987 Jan 23;235(4787):458-60 PMID: 17810339
  14. The direct rotation function: Patterson correlation search applied to molecular replacement.
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1995 Sep 1;51(Pt 5):740-8 PMID: 15299804
  15. Stereochemically restrained refinement of macromolecular structures.
    Methods Enzymol. 1985;115:252-70 PMID: 3841182
Article Info
Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Abbr.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
ISSN
0027-8424
Published
1997-05-13
Pages
5018-23
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
7505876
PMCID
PMC24623
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com