Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 9084067 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Predisposition to self-administer amphetamine: the contribution of response to novelty and prior exposure to the drug.

Psychopharmacology ·Vol. 129 ·No. 3 ·1997-02-00 ·Pages 277-84

Pierre PJ, Vezina P

Abstract

The present experiment examined the contribution of locomotor response to novelty and prior exposure to amphetamine to rats' predisposition to self-administer a low dose of the drug. Rats were screened for their locomotor response to a novel environment and divided into high (HR) or low (LR) responders based on whether their locomotor scores were above or below the median activity level of the subject sample. Animals were then pre-exposed to nine daily injections of either saline (1 ml/kg, i.p.) or amphetamine (1.5 mg/kg, i.p.). Starting 1 week after pre-exposure, animals in the four different groups (HR pre-exposed to saline or amphetamine; LR pre-exposed to saline or amphetamine) were given the opportunity, in each of ten daily sessions, to lever press for a low dose of amphetamine (10 micrograms/kg per infusion) in a two lever (active versus inactive) continuous reinforcement operant task. Initial lever press performance revealed no difference in active versus inactive lever pressing between amphetamine and saline pre-exposed animals. However, in agreement with previous reports, with successive test sessions amphetamine pre-exposed rats maintained higher levels of active versus inactive lever pressing for drug while saline pre-exposed rats showed a progressive decrease in the pressing of either lever. Interestingly, this enhanced active lever pressing was observed in HR but not LR rats pre-exposed to amphetamine. In addition, HR saline pre-exposed animals showed initial active versus inactive lever pressing equivalent to that of HR amphetamine pretreated rats but this enhanced responding for drug diminished over days and by the last day of self-administration was indistinguishable from that of LR animals having been pre-exposed either to amphetamine or saline. These findings confirm that prior exposure to amphetamine promotes the subsequent self-administration of the drug and suggest that response to novelty may be a predictor more closely linked to an animal's propensity to become sensitized to the facilitatory effects of the drug rather than to an animal's current sensitization state and predisposition to self-administer the drug.

MeSH Terms
Amphetamine/pharmacology Animals Central Nervous System Stimulants/pharmacology Exploratory Behavior/drug effects Individuality Male Motor Activity/drug effects Rats Rats, Sprague-Dawley Self Administration
Chemicals
Central Nervous System Stimulants Amphetamine
Authors & Affiliations
2 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Pierre P J
Department of Psychiatry, University of Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Vezina P
References (37)
37 references, click to expand
  1. Individual differences in basal and cocaine-stimulated extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens using quantitative microdialysis.
    Brain Res. 1992 Aug 7;587(2):306-12 PMID: 1525663
  2. Individual differences in schedule-induced and conditioned behaviors.
    Behav Brain Res. 1994 Feb 28;60(2):199-209 PMID: 7911672
  3. Persistence of the ability of amphetamine preexposure to facilitate acquisition of cocaine self-administration.
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1994 Jan;47(1):203-5 PMID: 8115423
  4. Cocaine self-administration in rats influenced by environmental conditions: implications for the etiology of drug abuse.
    Neurosci Lett. 1987 Oct 16;81(1-2):227-31 PMID: 3696469
  5. Relationship between schedule-induced polydipsia and amphetamine intravenous self-administration. Individual differences and role of experience.
    Behav Brain Res. 1993 Jun 30;55(2):185-93 PMID: 8357527
  6. Response to novelty predicts the locomotor and nucleus accumbens dopamine response to cocaine.
    Synapse. 1991 Oct;9(2):121-8 PMID: 1821483
  7. Time course of transient behavioral depression and persistent behavioral sensitization in relation to regional brain monoamine concentrations during amphetamine withdrawal in rats.
    Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1991;103(4):480-92 PMID: 2062986
  8. Role of repeated exposure to morphine in determining its affective properties: place and taste conditioning studies in rats.
    Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1991;103(2):183-6 PMID: 2027919
  9. Amphetamine-induced time-dependent sensitization of dopamine neurotransmission in the dorsal and ventral striatum: a microdialysis study in behaving rats.
    Synapse. 1995 Jan;19(1):56-65 PMID: 7709344
  10. Prenatal stress in rats facilitates amphetamine-induced sensitization and induces long-lasting changes in dopamine receptors in the nucleus accumbens.
    Brain Res. 1995 Jul 10;685(1-2):179-86 PMID: 7583244
  11. Locomotor response to novelty does not predict cocaine place preference conditioning in rats.
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1996 Jan;53(1):191-6 PMID: 8848450
  12. Pathophysiological basis of vulnerability to drug abuse: role of an interaction between stress, glucocorticoids, and dopaminergic neurons.
    Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1996;36:359-78 PMID: 8725394
  13. Animals predisposed to develop amphetamine self-administration show higher susceptibility to develop contextual conditioning of both amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion and sensitization.
    Brain Res. 1994 Sep 19;657(1-2):236-44 PMID: 7820624
  14. Sensitization to the conditioned rewarding effects of cocaine: pharmacological and temporal characteristics.
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1995 May;273(2):808-15 PMID: 7752084
  15. Preexposure sensitizes rats to the rewarding effects of cocaine.
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1990 Dec;37(4):707-11 PMID: 2093176
  16. Higher and longer stress-induced increase in dopamine concentrations in the nucleus accumbens of animals predisposed to amphetamine self-administration. A microdialysis study.
    Brain Res. 1993 Jan 29;602(1):169-74 PMID: 8448654
  17. Individual differences in novelty-induced activity do not predict strength of amphetamine-induced place conditioning.
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1994 Jul;48(3):581-6 PMID: 7938109
  18. Dopamine transmission in the initiation and expression of drug- and stress-induced sensitization of motor activity.
    Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1991 Sep-Dec;16(3):223-44 PMID: 1665095
  19. Preexposure to amphetamine and nicotine predisposes rats to self-administer a low dose of cocaine.
    Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1992;107(2-3):271-6 PMID: 1615126
  20. Social stress increases the acquisition of cocaine self-administration in male and female rats.
    Brain Res. 1995 Nov 6;698(1-2):46-52 PMID: 8581502
  21. Effects of repeated methamphetamine administration on methamphetamine self-administration in rhesus monkeys.
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1984 Nov;21(5):737-41 PMID: 6514766
  22. Controlling interindividual differences in the unconditioned response to amphetamine in the study of environment-dependent sensitization.
    Behav Pharmacol. 1993;4(4):355-365 PMID: 11224204
  23. Behaviour in the novel environment predicts responsiveness to d-amphetamine in the rat: a multivariate approach.
    Behav Pharmacol. 1993 Feb;4(1):47-56 PMID: 11224170
  24. Basal extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens during amphetamine withdrawal: a 'no net flux' microdialysis study.
    Neurosci Lett. 1993 Dec 24;164(1-2):145-8 PMID: 8152590
  25. Dopaminergic activity is reduced in the prefrontal cortex and increased in the nucleus accumbens of rats predisposed to develop amphetamine self-administration.
    Brain Res. 1991 Dec 13;567(1):169-74 PMID: 1726140
  26. Social deprivation enhances the vulnerability of male Wistar rats to stressor- and amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization.
    Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1995 Jan;117(1):116-24 PMID: 7724696
  27. Individual differences in amphetamine sensitization: dose-dependent effects.
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1992 Jan;41(1):203-10 PMID: 1539070
  28. Sensitization and individual differences to IP amphetamine, cocaine, or caffeine following repeated intracranial amphetamine infusions.
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1992 Nov;43(3):815-23 PMID: 1448477
  29. Repeated exposures intensify rather than diminish the rewarding effects of amphetamine, morphine, and cocaine.
    Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1989;98(3):357-62 PMID: 2546170
  30. Stress- and pharmacologically-induced behavioral sensitization increases vulnerability to acquisition of amphetamine self-administration.
    Brain Res. 1990 Apr 23;514(1):22-6 PMID: 2357527
  31. Individual differences in locomotor activity and sensitization.
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1991 Feb;38(2):467-70 PMID: 2057515
  32. Strain differences in the rewarding and dopamine-releasing effects of morphine in rats.
    Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1995 Jan;117(2):240-7 PMID: 7753973
  33. Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration.
    Science. 1989 Sep 29;245(4925):1511-3 PMID: 2781295
  34. Experimental approach to individual vulnerability to psychostimulant addiction.
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1989 Summer-Fall;13(2-3):141-7 PMID: 2682400
  35. The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction.
    Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1993 Sep-Dec;18(3):247-91 PMID: 8401595
  36. Increased locomotor response to novelty and propensity to intravenous amphetamine self-administration in adult offspring of stressed mothers.
    Brain Res. 1992 Jul 17;586(1):135-9 PMID: 1511342
  37. Individual differences in behavioral measures: correlations with nucleus accumbens dopamine measured by microdialysis.
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1991 Aug;39(4):877-82 PMID: 1763106
Article Info
Journal
Psychopharmacology
Abbr.
Psychopharmacology (Berl)
ISSN
0033-3158
Published
1997-02-00
Pages
277-84
Language
English
Region
Germany
NLM ID
7608025
Subset
IM
Grants
NIDA NIH HHS · DA-09397 · United States
NIDA NIH HHS · T32-DA-07255 · United States
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com