Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 9007976 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Studies of protein-protein interfaces: a statistical analysis of the hydrophobic effect.

Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society ·Vol. 6 ·No. 1 ·1997-01-00 ·Pages 53-64

Tsai CJ, Lin SL, Wolfson HJ, Nussinov R

Abstract

Data sets of 362 structurally nonredundant protein-protein interfaces and of 57 symmetry-related oligomeric interfaces have been used to explore whether the hydrophobic effect that guides protein folding is also the main driving force for protein-protein associations. The buried nonpolar surface area has been used to measure the hydrophobic effect. Our analysis indicates that, although the hydrophobic effect plays a dominant role in protein-protein binding, it is not as strong as that observed in the interior of protein monomers. Comparison of interiors of the monomers with those of the interfaces reveals that, in general, the hydrophobic amino acids are more frequent in the interior of the monomers than in the interior of the protein-protein interfaces. On the other hand, a higher proportion of charged and polar residues are buried at the interfaces, suggesting that hydrogen bonds and ion pairs contribute more to the stability of protein binding than to that of protein folding. Moreover, comparison of the interior of the interfaces to protein surfaces indicates that the interfaces are poorer in polar/charged than the surfaces and are richer in hydrophobic residues. The interior of the interfaces appears to constitute a compromise between the stabilization contributed by the hydrophobic effect on the one hand and avoiding patches on the protein surfaces that are too hydrophobic on the other. Such patches would be unfavorable for the unassociated monomers in solution. We conclude that, although the types of interactions are similar between protein-protein interfaces and single-chain proteins overall, the contribution of the hydrophobic effect to protein-protein associations is not as strong as to protein folding. This implies that packing patterns and interatom, or interresidue, pairwise potential functions, derived from monomers, are not ideally suited to predicting and assessing ligand associations or design. These would perform adequately only in cases where the hydrophobic effect at the binding site is substantial.

MeSH Terms
Amino Acids/analysis Protein Binding Protein Conformation Protein Folding Proteins/chemistry,metabolism
Chemicals
Amino Acids Proteins
Authors & Affiliations
4 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Tsai C J
Laboratory of Mathematical Biology, NCI-FCRF, Frederick, Maryland 21702, USA.
Lin S L
Wolfson H J
Nussinov R
References (17)
17 references, click to expand
  1. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility.
    J Mol Biol. 1971 Feb 14;55(3):379-400 PMID: 5551392
  2. Protein-protein interaction at crystal contacts.
    Proteins. 1995 Dec;23(4):580-7 PMID: 8749854
  3. The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures.
    J Mol Biol. 1977 May 25;112(3):535-42 PMID: 875032
  4. Hydrophobicity scales and computational techniques for detecting amphipathic structures in proteins.
    J Mol Biol. 1987 Jun 5;195(3):659-85 PMID: 3656427
  5. Why do globular proteins fit the limited set of folding patterns?
    Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1987;50(3):171-90 PMID: 3332386
  6. Dominant forces in protein folding.
    Biochemistry. 1990 Aug 7;29(31):7133-55 PMID: 2207096
  7. New algorithm to model protein-protein recognition based on surface complementarity. Applications to antibody-antigen docking.
    J Mol Biol. 1992 Nov 5;228(1):277-97 PMID: 1280302
  8. Estimation of surface hydrophobicity of proteins by partitioning.
    Methods Enzymol. 1994;228:254-64 PMID: 8047009
  9. A role for surface hydrophobicity in protein-protein recognition.
    Protein Sci. 1994 May;3(5):717-29 PMID: 8061602
  10. Biological meaning, statistical significance, and classification of local spatial similarities in nonhomologous proteins.
    Protein Sci. 1994 Jun;3(6):866-75 PMID: 8069217
  11. Hydrophobic docking: a proposed enhancement to molecular recognition techniques.
    Proteins. 1994 Dec;20(4):320-9 PMID: 7731951
  12. How many protein folding motifs are there?
    J Mol Biol. 1995 Sep 8;252(1):144-51 PMID: 7666426
  13. A novel approach to predicting protein structural classes in a (20-1)-D amino acid composition space.
    Proteins. 1995 Apr;21(4):319-44 PMID: 7567954
  14. Principles of protein-protein interactions.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jan 9;93(1):13-20 PMID: 8552589
  15. Protein-protein interfaces: architectures and interactions in protein-protein interfaces and in protein cores. Their similarities and differences.
    Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 1996 Apr;31(2):127-52 PMID: 8740525
  16. A dataset of protein-protein interfaces generated with a sequence-order-independent comparison technique.
    J Mol Biol. 1996 Jul 26;260(4):604-20 PMID: 8759323
  17. Environment and exposure to solvent of protein atoms. Lysozyme and insulin.
    J Mol Biol. 1973 Sep 15;79(2):351-71 PMID: 4760134
Article Info
Journal
Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society
Abbr.
Protein Sci
ISSN
0961-8368
Published
1997-01-00
Pages
53-64
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
9211750
PMCID
PMC2143524
Subset
IM
Grants
NCI NIH HHS · 1-CO-74102 · United States
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com