Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 8978878 Published · ppublish English Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Response error in self-reported current smoking frequency by black and white established smokers.

Annals of epidemiology ·Vol. 6 ·No. 6 ·1996-11-00 ·Pages 483-9

Clark PI, Gautam SP, Hlaing WM, Gerson LW

Abstract

As compared with white smokers, black smokers, although they report using fewer cigarettes per day, are at higher risk for most smoking-related diseases. Among black smokers serum cotinine levels are also higher in proportion to cigarettes per day; this observation has led to suggestions of bias in self-reporting. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the extent of errors in self-reported smoking patterns among black and white established smokers. Ninety-seven white and 66 black smokers participated in structured telephone interviews, filled out two self-administered questionnaires one week apart, and collected all of their cigarette butts for a week. Group differences in the validity of self-reported smoking patterns were assessed by comparison with cigarette butt counts and the measured butt lengths. Both black and white smokers significantly overestimated smoking on our measure of smoking frequency (both P < 0.001); the group difference in bias was not significant (P = 0.13). There was no evidence that underreporting was more common among blacks than among whites (P = 0.67). Test-retest reliability was not significantly different in the two groups (P = 0.09). Both groups performed poorly when asked to categorize their smoking frequency according to the cutpoints of the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence. Black smokers smoked more of each cigarette and smoked longer cigarettes, but they smoked fewer total millimeters of cigarettes per day (all P < 0.001). Contrary to an earlier report, the disproportionately high cotinine levels could not be attributed to reporting error.

MeSH Terms
Adult African Americans Analysis of Variance Bias Cotinine/analysis Female Humans Incidence Male Reproducibility of Results Smoking/epidemiology,ethnology Surveys and Questionnaires Whites
Chemicals
Cotinine
Authors & Affiliations
4 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Clark P I
Division of Community Health Sciences, Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine, Rootstown 44272, USA.
Gautam S P
Hlaing W M
Gerson L W
Article Info
Journal
Annals of epidemiology
Abbr.
Ann Epidemiol
ISSN
1047-2797
Published
1996-11-00
Pages
483-9
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
9100013
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com