Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 8555849 Published · ppublish English Clinical Trial Comparative Study Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

A randomised prospective comparison of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and nasogastric tube feeding after acute dysphagic stroke.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.) ·Vol. 312 ·No. 7022 ·1996-01-06 ·Pages 13-6

Norton B, Homer-Ward M, Donnelly MT, Long RG, Holmes GK

Abstract

To compare percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and nasogastric tube feeding after acute dysphagic stroke. Randomised prospective study of inpatients with acute stroke requiring enteral nutrition. One university hospital (Nottingham) and one district general hospital (Derby). 30 patients with persisting dysphagia at 14 days after acute stroke: 16 patients were randomised to gastrostomy tube feeding and 14 to nasogastric tube feeding. Six week mortality; amount of feed administered; change in nutritional state; treatment failure; and length of hospital stay. Mortality at 6 weeks was significantly lower in the gastrostomy group with two deaths (12%) compared with eight deaths (57%) in the nasogastric group (P < 0.05). All gastrostomy fed patients (16) received the total prescribed feed whereas 10/14 (71%) of nasogastric patients lost at least one day's feed. Nasogastric patients received a significantly (P < 0.001) smaller proportion of their prescribed feed (78%; 95% confidence interval 63% to 94%) compared with the gastrostomy group (100%). Patients fed via a gastrostomy tube showed greater improvement in nutritional state, according to several different criteria at six weeks compared with the nasogastric group. In the gastrostomy group the mean albumin concentration increased from 27.1 g/l (24.5 g/l to 29.7 g/l) to 30.1 g/l (28.3 g/l to 31.9 g/l). In contrast, among the nasogastric group there was a reduction from 31.4 g/l (28.6 g/l to 34.2 g/l) to 22.3 g/l (20.7 g/l to 23.9 g/l) (P < 0.003). In addition, there were fewer treatment failures in the gastrostomy group (0/16 versus 3/14). Six patients from the gastrostomy group were discharged from hospital within six weeks of the procedure compared with none from the nasogastric group (P < 0.05). This study indicates that early gastrostomy tube feeding is greatly superior to nasogastric tube feeding and should be the nutritional treatment of choice for patients with acute dysphagic stroke.

MeSH Terms
Acute Disease Aged Aged, 80 and over Body Weight Cerebrovascular Disorders/complications,mortality,therapy Deglutition Disorders/etiology,mortality,therapy Enteral Nutrition/methods Female Gastrostomy/methods Humans Male Nutritional Status Prospective Studies
Authors & Affiliations
5 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Norton B
Derbyshire Royal Infirmary, Derby.
Homer-Ward M
Donnelly M T
Long R G
Holmes G K
References (14)
14 references, click to expand
  1. Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with Stamm gastrostomy.
    Ann Surg. 1988 May;207(5):598-603 PMID: 3377569
  2. Tube feedings in elderly patients. Indications, benefits, and complications.
    Arch Intern Med. 1988 Feb;148(2):429-33 PMID: 3124777
  3. Portraits from memory. 16--Muriel Robertson, FRS (1883-1973).
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Jul 4;295(6589):41 PMID: 3113608
  4. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Indications, success, complications, and mortality in 314 consecutive patients.
    Gastroenterology. 1987 Jul;93(1):48-52 PMID: 3108063
  5. Swallowing disorders in persons with cerebrovascular accident.
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985 Jun;66(6):372-5 PMID: 4004534
  6. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a nonoperative technique for feeding gastrostomy.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 1981 Feb;27(1):9-11 PMID: 6783471
  7. FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX.
    Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61-5 PMID: 14258950
  8. Efficacy of tube feeding in supplying energy requirements of hospitalized patients.
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1989 Jul-Aug;13(4):387-91 PMID: 2506375
  9. Percutaneous endoscopic vs surgical gastrostomy.
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1990 Sep-Oct;14(5):533-4 PMID: 2122027
  10. Assessment of the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding tube as part of an integrated approach to enteral feeding.
    Gut. 1992 May;33(5):613-6 PMID: 1612476
  11. Randomised comparison of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and nasogastric tube feeding in patients with persisting neurological dysphagia.
    BMJ. 1992 May 30;304(6839):1406-9 PMID: 1628013
  12. Standards for the hospital management of stroke patients.
    J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1994 Jan-Feb;28(1):52-8 PMID: 8169884
  13. The use of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in 161 consecutive elderly patients.
    Age Ageing. 1994 Mar;23(2):162-3 PMID: 8023728
  14. Spontaneous transpyloric passage and performance of 'fine bore' polyurethane feeding tubes: a controlled clinical trial.
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1988 Sep-Oct;12(5):469-72 PMID: 3141643
Article Info
Journal
BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
Abbr.
BMJ
ISSN
0959-8138
Published
1996-01-06
Pages
13-6
Language
English
Region
England
NLM ID
8900488
PMCID
PMC2349687
Subset
IM
Corrections
CommentIn
-
CommentIn
CommentIn
CommentIn
CommentIn
CommentIn
CommentIn
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com