Physiological properties of motoneurons innervating different muscle unit types in rat gastrocnemius.

1. The contractile properties of gastrocnemius muscle units and the electrophysiological properties of their innervating motoneurons were examined in anesthetized adult male Sprague-Dawley rats in situ, using conventional microelectrode techniques. 2. Muscle units (n = 70) were classified as fast (F) or slow (S) on the basis of the degree of force summation during stimulation at 25 Hz, as well as fatigue resistance, in response to current injection into innervating motoneurons. S units categorized using these criteria were also found to invariably demonstrate twitch half-relaxation times (RT1/2) > 28 ms, with F units demonstrating RT1/2 < 27 ms. Some overlap was present between F and S units in twitch time-to-peck tension (TPT). 3. S muscle units were innervated by motoneurons with significantly higher afterhyperpolarization (AHP) times-to-peak and half-decay times, AHP amplitudes, and input resistances than F units. Motoneurons innervating S units also demonstrated slower mean axon conduction velocity than F units. 4. F units were further classified as fast fatiguing (FF), fast fatigue-resistant (FR), or fast intermediate (FI) on the basis of their fatigue resistance. Muscle unit forces were different among the unit types such that FF > FI > FR > S. Twitch TPT and RT1/2 differed such that FF < FI, FR < S. 5. No differences among FF, FI, and FR units were found for measures of AHP time course, AHP amplitude, rheobase, or input resistance. The only motoneuron property that differed among F unit types was axon conduction velocity, which was lower for FF than for FI and FR units. 6. The best relationships between muscle unit and motoneuron physiological properties were between expression of twitch time course, which included RT1/2 and AHP half-decay time (r = 0.73 to 0.74). S units always had AHP half-decay times > 20 ms, whereas for F units, values never exceeded 19 ms. Correlations between these variables increased when only S units were considered (r = 0.86-0.97), and were weak and not significant among F units only. 7. The only other significant correlations between muscle unit and motoneuron properties > 0.5 were between input resistance and expressions of twitch time course (r = 0.56-0.66). These relationships were nonexistent when type S units were not included in the analysis. 8. A sample of tibial motoneurons (n = 98) that innervated hindlimb muscles other than gastrocnemius was combined with the gastrocnemius motoneurons to examine interrelationships among motoneuron properties.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)