Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 8098339 Published · ppublish English Clinical Trial Comparative Study Controlled Clinical Trial Journal Article

The comparative actions and adverse effect profile of single doses of H1-receptor antihistamines in the airways and skin of subjects with asthma.

The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology ·Vol. 91 ·No. 5 ·1993-05-00 ·Pages 1005-14

Wood-Baker R, Holgate ST

Abstract

The development of potent H1-receptor antagonists that are free of adverse effects has renewed interest in their use in the treatment of asthma. We performed a study of the action of chlorpheniramine, terfenadine, brompheniramine, cetirizine, cyproheptadine, clemastine, and astemizole compared with placebo on histamine-induced skin wheals and bronchoconstriction in a single group of patients with asthma. Another group underwent methacholine bronchoprovocation. Antihistamine pretreatment increased mean baseline measurements of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) between 2.58% and 9.28% compared with placebo, which was significant for all drugs except brompheniramine and clemastine. Compared with placebo, all antihistamines provided significant protection against histamine-induced bronchoconstriction when measured as the provocation concentration required to cause a 20% fall in FEV1; terfenadine and cetirizine provided significantly greater protection than other antihistamines. Protection against histamine-induced skin wheals, measured as the slope of the log concentration-response curve, was only significant for the new drugs, terfenadine and cetirizine. There was a good correlation between the protective effect of the drugs in the skin and airways (r = 0.85; p < 0.01). No significant difference in methacholine provocation concentration required to cause a 20% fall in FEV1 values between treatments was found. The new H1-receptor antagonists terfenadine and cetirizine provided significantly better protection than the older antihistamines against the action of histamine in the skin and airways. None of the antihistamines showed evidence of anticholinergic activity in the asthmatic airways at the doses studied.

MeSH Terms
Adult Asthma/drug therapy,physiopathology Bronchial Provocation Tests Bronchoconstriction/drug effects Female Forced Expiratory Volume/drug effects Histamine Histamine H1 Antagonists/adverse effects,pharmacology,therapeutic use Humans Hypersensitivity, Immediate/drug therapy Male Middle Aged Single-Blind Method Skin Tests
Chemicals
Histamine H1 Antagonists Histamine
Authors & Affiliations
2 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Wood-Baker R
Department of Immunopharmacology, Southampton General Hospital, England.
Holgate S T
Article Info
Journal
The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology
Abbr.
J Allergy Clin Immunol
ISSN
0091-6749
Published
1993-05-00
Pages
1005-14
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
1275002
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com