Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 7904666 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Outcome prediction in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia by molecular quantification of residual disease at the end of induction.

Lancet (London, England) ·Vol. 343 ·No. 8891 ·1994-01-22 ·Pages 196-200

Brisco MJ, Condon J, Hughes E, Neoh SH, Sykes PJ, Seshadri R, Toogood I, Waters K, Tauro G, Ekert H

Abstract

Methods to detect and quantify minimal residual disease (MRD) after chemotherapy for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) could improve treatment by identifying patients who need more or less intensive therapy. We have used a clone-specific polymerase chain reaction to detect rearranged immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene from the leukaemic clone, and quantified the clone by limiting dilution analysis. MRD was successfully quantified, by extracting DNA from marrow slides, from 88 of 181 children with ALL, who had total leucocyte counts below 100 x 10(9)/L at presentation and were enrolled in two clinical trials, in 1980-84 and 1985-89. Leukaemia was detected in the first remission marrow of 38 patients, in amounts between 6.7 x 10(-2) and 9.9 x 10(-7) cells; 26 of these patients relapsed. Of 50 patients with no MRD detected, despite study of 522-496,000 genomes, only 6 relapsed. The association between MRD detection and outcome was significant for patients in each trial. In the first trial, patients relapsed at all levels of detected MRD, whereas in the later trial, in which treatment was more intensive and results were better, the extent of MRD was closely related to the probability of relapse (5 of 5 patients with > 10(-3) MRD, 4 of 10 with 10(-3) to 2 x 10(-5), 0 of 3 with levels below 2 x 10(-5), and 2 of 26 with no MRD detected). Early quantification of leukaemic cells after chemotherapy may be a successful strategy for predicting outcome and hence individualizing treatment in childhood ALL, because the results indicate both in-vivo drug sensitivity of the leukaemia and the number of leukaemic cells that remain to be killed by post-induction therapy.

MeSH Terms
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use Base Sequence Bone Marrow Examination/methods Child DNA, Neoplasm/analysis Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor Evaluation Studies as Topic Female Gene Rearrangement, T-Lymphocyte/genetics Humans Leukocyte Count Life Tables Male Molecular Sequence Data Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/blood,drug therapy,genetics,mortality,pathology Prognosis Proportional Hazards Models Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Recurrence Remission Induction Risk Factors Sensitivity and Specificity Survival Rate Treatment Outcome
Chemicals
DNA, Neoplasm
Authors & Affiliations
10 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Brisco M J
Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia.
Condon J
Hughes E
Neoh S H
Sykes P J
Seshadri R
Toogood I
Waters K
Tauro G
Ekert H
Article Info
Journal
Lancet (London, England)
Abbr.
Lancet
ISSN
0140-6736
Published
1994-01-22
Pages
196-200
Language
English
Region
England
NLM ID
2985213R
Subset
IM
Databases
GENBANK
L23222, L23223, L23224, L23225, L23226, L23227, L23228, L23229, L23230, L23231, L23232, L23233, L23234, L23235, L23236, L23237, L23238, L23239, L23240, L23241, L23242, L23243, L23244, L23245, L23246, L23247, L23248, L23249, L23250, L23251
Corrections
CommentIn
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com