Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 6852232 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

How good are predictions of protein secondary structure?

FEBS letters ·Vol. 155 ·No. 2 ·1983-05-08 ·Pages 179-82

Kabsch W, Sander C

Abstract

The three most widely used methods for the prediction of protein secondary structure from the amino acid sequence are tested on 62 proteins of known structure using a program package and data collection not previously available. None of these methods predicts better than 56% of the residues correctly, for a three state model (helix, sheet and loop). The algorithms of Robson et al. [J. Mol. Biol. (1978) 120, 97-120] and Lim [J. Mol. Biol. (1974) 88, 873-894] are the best of those tested. New methods, now under development, can be tested against this benchmark.

MeSH Terms
Amino Acid Sequence Chemical Phenomena Chemistry Probability Protein Conformation
Authors & Affiliations
2 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Kabsch W
Sander C
Article Info
Journal
FEBS letters
Abbr.
FEBS Lett
ISSN
0014-5793
Published
1983-05-08
Pages
179-82
Language
English
Region
England
NLM ID
0155157
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com