Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 6769652 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Mechanisms of chromosome orientation revealed by two meiotic mutants in Drosophila melanogaster.

Chromosoma ·Vol. 78 ·No. 1 ·1980-00-00 ·Pages 79-111

Goldstein LS

Abstract

Two disjunction defective meiotic mutants, ord and mei-S332, each of which disrupts meiosis in both male and female Drosophila melanogaster, were analyzed cytologically and genetically in the male germ-line. It was observed that sister-chromatids are frequently associated abnormally during prophase I and metaphase I in ord. Sister chromatid associations in mei-S332 are generally normal during prophase I and metaphare I. By telophase I, sister chromatids have frequently precociously separated in both mutants. During the first division sister chromatids disjoin from one another frequently in ord and rarely in mei-S332. It is argued that the simplest interpretation of the observations is that each mutant is defective in sister chromatid cohesiveness and that the defect in ord manifests itself earlier than does the defect in mei-S332. In addition, based on these mutant effects, several conclusions regarding normal meiotic processes are drawn. (1) The phenotype of these mutants support the proposition that the second meiotic metaphase (mitotic-type) position of chromosomes and their equational orientation is a consequence of the equilibrium, at the metaphase plate, of pulling forces acting at the kinetochores and directed towards the poles. (2) Chromosomes which lag during the second meiotic division tend to be lost. (3) Sister chromatid cohesiveness, or some function necessary for sister chromatid cohesivenss, is required for the normal reductional orientation of sister kinetochores during the first meiotic division. (4) The kinetochores of a half-bivalent are double at the time of chromosome orientation during the first meiotic division. Finally, functions which are required throughout meiosis in both sexes must be considered in the pathways of meiotic control.

MeSH Terms
Animals Chromatids/ultrastructure Chromosomes/ultrastructure Drosophila melanogaster/genetics Karyotyping Male Meiosis Mutation Testis/ultrastructure
Authors & Affiliations
1 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Goldstein L S
References (21)
21 references, click to expand
  1. Gene expression and the control of spermatid morphogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Dev Biol. 1977 Jul 15;58(2):276-94 PMID: 407115
  2. The genetic control of meiosis.
    Annu Rev Genet. 1976;10:53-134 PMID: 797314
  3. Chromosome segregation mechanisms.
    Genetics. 1974 Sep;78(1):205-13 PMID: 4442702
  4. Mitosis.
    Adv Cell Biol. 1971;2:225-97 PMID: 5005502
  5. Mutants affecting meiosis in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Genetics. 1968 Nov;60(3):525-58 PMID: 5728740
  6. The influence of chromosome content on the size and shape of sperm heads in Drosophila melanogaster and the demonstration of chromosome loss during spermiogenesis.
    Genetics. 1975 Feb;79(2):231-64 PMID: 805747
  7. A possible role for the synaptonemal complex in chiasma maintenance.
    Exp Cell Res. 1978 Mar 15;112(2):297-308 PMID: 637919
  8. MEIOTIC CONJUNCTIVE ELEMENTS NOT INVOLVING CHIASMATA.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1964 Nov;52:1248-55 PMID: 14231449
  9. Cytogenetic Studies of Precocious Meiotic Centromere Division in Lycopersicon Esculentum Mill.
    Genetics. 1959 Nov;44(6):1335-46 PMID: 17247897
  10. Kinetochore-to-pole connections during prometaphase of the meiotic divisions in Urechis eggs.
    Exp Cell Res. 1965 Sep;39(2):658-68 PMID: 5891319
  11. Cellular mechanisms of chromosome distribution.
    Int Rev Cytol. 1970;:Suppl 2:1-173 PMID: 4946097
  12. Orientation disruptor (ord): a recombination-defective and disjunction-defective meiotic mutant in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Genetics. 1976 Nov;84(3):545-72 PMID: 826453
  13. [Electron microscopic studies on the form change of kinetochores during spermatocyte divisions in Pales ferruginea (Nematocera)].
    Chromosoma. 1972;38(2):139-72 PMID: 5066446
  14. Genetic analysis of a meiotic mutant resulting in precocious sister-centromere separation in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Mol Gen Genet. 1971;113(3):251-72 PMID: 5003954
  15. The Utilization during Mitotic Cell Division of Loci Controlling Meiotic Recombination and Disjunction in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.
    Genetics. 1978 Nov;90(3):531-78 PMID: 17248870
  16. Chromosome micromanipulation. IV. Polarized motions within the spindle and models for mitosis.
    Chromosoma. 1972;39(1):1-26 PMID: 5073283
  17. Letter: The need for a chiasma binder.
    J Theor Biol. 1974 Dec;48(2):485-7 PMID: 4459599
  18. [Multiple sex chromosomes in Ostracoda cypria, their evolution and division characteristics].
    Chromosoma. 1958;9(5):359-440 PMID: 13619004
  19. Chromosome micromanipulation. 3. Spindle fiber tension and the reorientation of mal-oriented chromosomes.
    J Cell Biol. 1969 Oct;43(1):40-50 PMID: 5824068
  20. The structure of the kinetochore in meiosis and mitosis in Urechis eggs.
    Exp Cell Res. 1965 Sep;39(2):643-57 PMID: 5891318
  21. [Structure and function of the spindle apparatus].
    Naturwissenschaften. 1969 May;56(5):237-48 PMID: 4902729
Article Info
Journal
Chromosoma
Abbr.
Chromosoma
ISSN
0009-5915
Published
1980-00-00
Pages
79-111
Language
English
Region
Austria
NLM ID
2985138R
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com