Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 3890818 Published · ppublish English Clinical Trial Comparative Study Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of netilmicin with cefoperazone for the treatment of severe or complicated urinary tract infections.

Australian and New Zealand journal of medicine ·Vol. 15 ·No. 1 ·1985-02-00 ·Pages 22-6

Bailey RR, Peddie BA, Lynn KL, Swainson CP

Abstract

A randomised trial was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of netilmicin and cefoperazone for the treatment of severe or complicated urinary tract infections. Thirty-two patients completed the study. Fifteen of 16 patients treated with netilmicin and nine of 16 treated with cefoperazone were cured. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.037). No serious side effects or toxicity occurred with either drug, although five patients developed diarrhea after treatment with cefoperazone.

MeSH Terms
Acute Disease Adolescent Adult Aged Cefoperazone/adverse effects,therapeutic use Clinical Trials as Topic Female Gentamicins/therapeutic use Humans Male Middle Aged Netilmicin/therapeutic use Pyelonephritis/drug therapy Random Allocation Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy
Chemicals
Gentamicins Netilmicin Cefoperazone
Authors & Affiliations
4 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Bailey R R
Peddie B A
Lynn K L
Swainson C P
Article Info
Journal
Australian and New Zealand journal of medicine
Abbr.
Aust N Z J Med
ISSN
0004-8291
Published
1985-02-00
Pages
22-6
Language
English
Region
Australia
NLM ID
1264322
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com