Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 3698743 Published · ppublish English Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Stable versus unstable orientations of sex chromosomes in two grasshopper species.

Chromosoma ·Vol. 93 ·No. 4 ·1986-00-00 ·Pages 298-304

Ault JG

Abstract

The structural basis of orientation stability was investigated. The stable unipolar orientation of the Melanoplus sanguinipes X-chromosome univalent is unique in that it is stable without tension created by forces towards opposite poles; tension is thought to be the principle component in stabilizing kinetochore orientations to a pole. Stable orientation of the X chromosome in Melanoplus sanguinipes was compared with unstable X orientation in Melanoplus differentialis. Ten cells (five of each species) were studied, firstly in living cultures where chromosome behavior was followed, then by serial-section electron microscopy where the structural basis for chromosome behavior was examined. Microtubules other than kinetochore microtubules were observed impinging on the X chromosomes. One end of these microtubules was buried in chromatin, while the other ran toward a pole. The X chromosomes of M. sanguinipes had more of these microtubules than did M. differentialis X chromosomes. It is suggested that M. sanguinipes X chromosomes are less condensed than M. differentialis X chromosomes and so allow more microtubules to penetrate the chromosome. The extra microtubules impinging on the M. sanguinipes X chromosome probably prevent reorientation by inhibiting the turning of the chromosome towards the opposite pole, i.e., more force is needed to turn a kinetochore towards the opposite pole than can be generated and attempts at reorientation fail. This may be analogous to the effect that tension has on the orientation stability of bivalents.

MeSH Terms
Animals Cells, Cultured Grasshoppers/genetics Microscopy, Electron Microtubules/ultrastructure Motion Pictures Species Specificity X Chromosome/ultrastructure
Authors & Affiliations
1 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Ault J G
References (7)
7 references, click to expand
  1. Electron microscopy of spermatocytes previously studied in life: methods and some observations on micromanipulated chromosomes.
    J Cell Sci. 1979 Feb;35:87-104 PMID: 370131
  2. Co-orientation stability by physical tension: A demonstration with experimentally interlocked bivalents.
    Chromosoma. 1970;29(2):207-16 PMID: 5461076
  3. Recurrent pole-to-pole movements of the sex chromosome during prometaphase I in Melanoplus differentialis spermatocytes.
    Chromosoma. 1961;12:97-115 PMID: 13728791
  4. Spindle microtubules and their mechanical associations after micromanipulation in anaphase.
    J Cell Biol. 1982 Oct;95(1):91-104 PMID: 6890559
  5. Chromosome micromanipulation. II. Induced reorientation and the experimental control of segregation in meiosis.
    Chromosoma. 1967;21(1):17-50 PMID: 6029962
  6. Computer measurements and graphics of three-dimensional cellular ultrastructure.
    J Ultrastruct Res. 1981 May;75(2):131-41 PMID: 7021873
  7. Chromosome micromanipulation. 3. Spindle fiber tension and the reorientation of mal-oriented chromosomes.
    J Cell Biol. 1969 Oct;43(1):40-50 PMID: 5824068
Article Info
Journal
Chromosoma
Abbr.
Chromosoma
ISSN
0009-5915
Published
1986-00-00
Pages
298-304
Language
English
Region
Austria
NLM ID
2985138R
Subset
IM
Grants
NIGMS NIH HHS · GM 13745 · United States
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com