Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 3189311 Published · ppublish English Guideline Journal Article Practice Guideline

Guidelines for clinical protocols for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: recommendations of the National Cancer Institute-sponsored working group.

American journal of hematology ·Vol. 29 ·No. 3 ·1988-11-00 ·Pages 152-63

Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Rai KR, Grever MR, Kay NE, Schiffer CA, Oken MM, Keating MJ, Boldt DH, Kempin SJ

Abstract

The National Cancer Institute (NCI)-sponsored Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Working Group was convened to develop a set of standardized eligibility, response, and toxicity criteria for clinical trials. We recognized the previous efforts in 1967 (published again in 1973 as the report of the Chronic Leukemia-Myeloma Task Force [1] and 1978 of Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) [2]). We have used these reports for guidance during the current effort. Several noteworthy developments in the past few years have made it necessary to modify the previous guidelines. First, the diagnostic criteria for CLL and its clinical staging have been developed and well defined. Second, although staging systems facilitated entry of comparable and relatively homogeneous groups of patients in clinical trials, the definitions of response (CR) and partial response (PR) were not uniformly adopted from the previous guidelines in the clinical trials (Tables IA, IB); therefore, comparisons of results obtained in different studies became difficult. Third, there has been an improvement in our understanding of the immunology and biology of CLL. Finally, we are witnessing the emergence of several chemotherapy agents that promise impressive activity in CLL (e.g., 2'-deoxycoformycin [3], fludarabine monophosphate [4, 5]), and thereby offer the potential for improving survival time in this disease. To best identify regimens worthy of continued pursuit in large comparative trials, standardized guidelines for evaluation are essential. A number of laboratory investigations are also presented for which scientific interest is high yet relevance remains to be determined; thus, they are presented as companion studies to the clinical trials. This mechanism allows for flexibility in the testing of these questions and for additional ideas in the future without requiring modification of an entire treatment protocol. The following guidelines were developed to be used as a form of standardization for clinical trials, incorporating current technologies, yet remaining relevant to the general hematology/oncology community. Based on the membership of the Working Group, it is expected that these guidelines will serve as the criteria for most clinical trials in the near future.

MeSH Terms
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects,standards Clinical Trials as Topic/standards Drug Evaluation/standards Eligibility Determination/standards Health Planning Health Planning Guidelines Humans Infections/etiology Leukemia, B-Cell/diagnosis,drug therapy Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/blood,diagnosis,drug therapy,pathology National Institutes of Health (U.S.) Neoplasm Staging Prognosis United States
Chemicals
Antineoplastic Agents
Authors & Affiliations
10 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Cheson B D
Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
Bennett J M
Rai K R
Grever M R
Kay N E
Schiffer C A
Oken M M
Keating M J
Boldt D H
Kempin S J
Article Info
Journal
American journal of hematology
Abbr.
Am J Hematol
ISSN
0361-8609
Published
1988-11-00
Pages
152-63
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
7610369
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com