Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 27959923 Published · epublish English Journal Article

Patterns of Immune Infiltration in Breast Cancer and Their Clinical Implications: A Gene-Expression-Based Retrospective Study.

PLoS medicine ·Vol. 13 ·No. 12 ·2016-12-00 ·Pages e1002194

Ali HR, Chlon L, Pharoah PD, Markowetz F, Caldas C

Abstract

Immune infiltration of breast tumours is associated with clinical outcome. However, past work has not accounted for the diversity of functionally distinct cell types that make up the immune response. The aim of this study was to determine whether differences in the cellular composition of the immune infiltrate in breast tumours influence survival and treatment response, and whether these effects differ by molecular subtype. We applied an established computational approach (CIBERSORT) to bulk gene expression profiles of almost 11,000 tumours to infer the proportions of 22 subsets of immune cells. We investigated associations between each cell type and survival and response to chemotherapy, modelling cellular proportions as quartiles. We found that tumours with little or no immune infiltration were associated with different survival patterns according to oestrogen receptor (ER) status. In ER-negative disease, tumours lacking immune infiltration were associated with the poorest prognosis, whereas in ER-positive disease, they were associated with intermediate prognosis. Of the cell subsets investigated, T regulatory cells and M0 and M2 macrophages emerged as the most strongly associated with poor outcome, regardless of ER status. Among ER-negative tumours, CD8+ T cells (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.89, 95% CI 0.80-0.98; p = 0.02) and activated memory T cells (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.80-0.97; p = 0.01) were associated with favourable outcome. T follicular helper cells (odds ratio [OR] = 1.34, 95% CI 1.14-1.57; p < 0.001) and memory B cells (OR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.0-1.39; p = 0.04) were associated with pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER-negative disease, suggesting a role for humoral immunity in mediating response to cytotoxic therapy. Unsupervised clustering analysis using immune cell proportions revealed eight subgroups of tumours, largely defined by the balance between M0, M1, and M2 macrophages, with distinct survival patterns by ER status and associations with patient age at diagnosis. The main limitations of this study are the use of diverse platforms for measuring gene expression, including some not previously used with CIBERSORT, and the combined analysis of different forms of follow-up across studies. Large differences in the cellular composition of the immune infiltrate in breast tumours appear to exist, and these differences are likely to be important determinants of both prognosis and response to treatment. In particular, macrophages emerge as a possible target for novel therapies. Detailed analysis of the cellular immune response in tumours has the potential to enhance clinical prediction and to identify candidates for immunotherapy.

MeSH Terms
Breast Neoplasms/genetics,immunology Cluster Analysis Female Gene Expression Humans Proportional Hazards Models Retrospective Studies
Authors & Affiliations
5 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Ali H Raza
Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. | Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. | Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Chlon Leon
Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. | CRUK & EPSRC Cancer Imaging Centre in Cambridge and Manchester, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Pharoah Paul D P
Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom. | Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Markowetz Florian ORCID
Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. | CRUK & EPSRC Cancer Imaging Centre in Cambridge and Manchester, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Caldas Carlos
Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. | Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom. | CRUK & EPSRC Cancer Imaging Centre in Cambridge and Manchester, Cambridge, United Kingdom. | Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Conflict of Interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References (50)
50 references, click to expand
  1. CSF1R inhibition delays cervical and mammary tumor growth in murine models by attenuating the turnover of tumor-associated macrophages and enhancing infiltration by CD8+ T cells.
    Oncoimmunology. 2013 Dec 1;2(12):e26968 PMID: 24498562
  2. The prognostic landscape of genes and infiltrating immune cells across human cancers.
    Nat Med. 2015 Aug;21(8):938-45 PMID: 26193342
  3. Association between CD8+ T-cell infiltration and breast cancer survival in 12,439 patients.
    Ann Oncol. 2014 Aug;25(8):1536-43 PMID: 24915873
  4. Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies.
    J Clin Invest. 2011 Jul;121(7):2750-67 PMID: 21633166
  5. Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer.
    N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 28;366(26):2443-54 PMID: 22658127
  6. Two FOXP3(+)CD4(+) T cell subpopulations distinctly control the prognosis of colorectal cancers.
    Nat Med. 2016 Jun;22(6):679-84 PMID: 27111280
  7. Inappropriate use of bivariable analysis to screen risk factors for use in multivariable analysis.
    J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Aug;49(8):907-16 PMID: 8699212
  8. The prognostic relevance of tumour-infiltrating plasma cells and immunoglobulin kappa C indicates an important role of the humoral immune response in non-small cell lung cancer.
    Cancer Lett. 2013 Jun 10;333(2):222-8 PMID: 23370224
  9. voom: Precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts.
    Genome Biol. 2014 Feb 03;15(2):R29 PMID: 24485249
  10. Subtyping of breast cancer by immunohistochemistry to investigate a relationship between subtype and short and long term survival: a collaborative analysis of data for 10,159 cases from 12 studies.
    PLoS Med. 2010 May 25;7(5):e1000279 PMID: 20520800
  11. Tumor-associated macrophages: from mechanisms to therapy.
    Immunity. 2014 Jul 17;41(1):49-61 PMID: 25035953
  12. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes predict response to anthracycline-based chemotherapy in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer.
    Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13(6):R126 PMID: 22151962
  13. An immune response gene expression module identifies a good prognosis subtype in estrogen receptor negative breast cancer.
    Genome Biol. 2007;8(8):R157 PMID: 17683518
  14. Leukocyte complexity predicts breast cancer survival and functionally regulates response to chemotherapy.
    Cancer Discov. 2011 Jun;1(1):54-67 PMID: 22039576
  15. PD-1 blockade with nivolumab in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 22;372(4):311-9 PMID: 25482239
  16. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis.
    Lancet. 2014 Jul 12;384(9938):164-72 PMID: 24529560
  17. Targeting tumor-associated macrophages with anti-CSF-1R antibody reveals a strategy for cancer therapy.
    Cancer Cell. 2014 Jun 16;25(6):846-59 PMID: 24898549
  18. PD-L1 protein expression in breast cancer is rare, enriched in basal-like tumours and associated with infiltrating lymphocytes.
    Ann Oncol. 2015 Jul;26(7):1488-93 PMID: 25897014
  19. Molecular and genetic properties of tumors associated with local immune cytolytic activity.
    Cell. 2015 Jan 15;160(1-2):48-61 PMID: 25594174
  20. Integrative analysis of breast cancer reveals prognostic haematopoietic activity and patient-specific immune response profiles.
    Nat Commun. 2016 Jan 04;7:10248 PMID: 26725977
  21. Genome-driven integrated classification of breast cancer validated in over 7,500 samples.
    Genome Biol. 2014 Aug 28;15(8):431 PMID: 25164602
  22. Induction of tumor immunity by removing CD25+CD4+ T cells: a common basis between tumor immunity and autoimmunity.
    J Immunol. 1999 Nov 15;163(10):5211-8 PMID: 10553041
  23. Cancer immunoediting from immune surveillance to immune escape.
    Immunology. 2007 May;121(1):1-14 PMID: 17386080
  24. Antigen-driven oligoclonal expansion of tumor-infiltrating B cells in infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast.
    J Immunol. 2002 Aug 15;169(4):1829-36 PMID: 12165506
  25. Using the outcome for imputation of missing predictor values was preferred.
    J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;59(10):1092-101 PMID: 16980150
  26. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.
    Lancet. 2007 Oct 20;370(9596):1453-7 PMID: 18064739
  27. Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Phase Ib KEYNOTE-012 Study.
    J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jul 20;34(21):2460-7 PMID: 27138582
  28. The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups.
    Nature. 2012 Apr 18;486(7403):346-52 PMID: 22522925
  29. Validation of gene signatures that predict the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a substudy of the EORTC 10994/BIG 00-01 clinical trial.
    Lancet Oncol. 2007 Dec;8(12):1071-8 PMID: 18024211
  30. Leukocyte composition of human breast cancer.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Feb 21;109(8):2796-801 PMID: 21825174
  31. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours.
    Nature. 2012 Oct 4;490(7418):61-70 PMID: 23000897
  32. A three-gene model to robustly identify breast cancer molecular subtypes.
    J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Feb 22;104(4):311-25 PMID: 22262870
  33. Tumor-associated lymphocytes as an independent predictor of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.
    J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 1;28(1):105-13 PMID: 19917869
  34. Tumor rejection by in vivo administration of anti-CD25 (interleukin-2 receptor alpha) monoclonal antibody.
    Cancer Res. 1999 Jul 1;59(13):3128-33 PMID: 10397255
  35. CD4⁺ follicular helper T cell infiltration predicts breast cancer survival.
    J Clin Invest. 2013 Jul;123(7):2873-92 PMID: 23778140
  36. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes are prognostic in triple negative breast cancer and predictive for trastuzumab benefit in early breast cancer: results from the FinHER trial.
    Ann Oncol. 2014 Aug;25(8):1544-50 PMID: 24608200
  37. The immune contexture in human tumours: impact on clinical outcome.
    Nat Rev Cancer. 2012 Mar 15;12 (4):298-306 PMID: 22419253
  38. Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancers from two phase III randomized adjuvant breast cancer trials: ECOG 2197 and ECOG 1199.
    J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 20;32(27):2959-66 PMID: 25071121
  39. Genomic Analysis of Immune Cell Infiltrates Across 11 Tumor Types.
    J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Jun 22;108(11): PMID: 27335052
  40. Biological processes associated with breast cancer clinical outcome depend on the molecular subtypes.
    Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Aug 15;14(16):5158-65 PMID: 18698033
  41. Macrophage polarization in tumour progression.
    Semin Cancer Biol. 2008 Oct;18(5):349-55 PMID: 18467122
  42. CSF1R inhibition with emactuzumab in locally advanced diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumours of the soft tissue: a dose-escalation and dose-expansion phase 1 study.
    Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):949-56 PMID: 26179200
  43. A clinically relevant gene signature in triple negative and basal-like breast cancer.
    Breast Cancer Res. 2011 Oct 06;13(5):R97 PMID: 21978456
  44. Robust enumeration of cell subsets from tissue expression profiles.
    Nat Methods. 2015 May;12(5):453-7 PMID: 25822800
  45. The prognostic significance of B lymphocytes in invasive carcinoma of the breast.
    Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Apr;132(2):545-53 PMID: 21671016
  46. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without carboplatin in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive and triple-negative primary breast cancers.
    J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 20;33(9):983-91 PMID: 25534375
  47. Naturally occurring B-cell responses to breast cancer.
    Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2003 Dec;52(12):715-38 PMID: 12920480
  48. Safety and activity of anti-PD-L1 antibody in patients with advanced cancer.
    N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 28;366(26):2455-65 PMID: 22658128
  49. Computational pathology of pre-treatment biopsies identifies lymphocyte density as a predictor of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.
    Breast Cancer Res. 2016 Feb 16;18(1):21 PMID: 26882907
  50. Association of the autoimmune disease scleroderma with an immunologic response to cancer.
    Science. 2014 Jan 10;343 (6167):152-7 PMID: 24310608
Article Info
Journal
PLoS medicine
Abbr.
PLoS Med
ISSN
1549-1676
Published
2016-12-00
Epub
2016-00-13
Pages
e1002194
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
101231360
PMCID
PMC5154505
Subset
IM
Grants
Cancer Research UK · 10119 · United Kingdom
Cancer Research UK · 10124 · United Kingdom
Cancer Research UK · 9675 · United Kingdom
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com