Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 27824859 Published · epublish English Journal Article

The Strength of Selection against Neanderthal Introgression.

PLoS genetics ·Vol. 12 ·No. 11 ·2016-11-00 ·Pages e1006340

Juric I, Aeschbacher S, Coop G

Abstract

Hybridization between humans and Neanderthals has resulted in a low level of Neanderthal ancestry scattered across the genomes of many modern-day humans. After hybridization, on average, selection appears to have removed Neanderthal alleles from the human population. Quantifying the strength and causes of this selection against Neanderthal ancestry is key to understanding our relationship to Neanderthals and, more broadly, how populations remain distinct after secondary contact. Here, we develop a novel method for estimating the genome-wide average strength of selection and the density of selected sites using estimates of Neanderthal allele frequency along the genomes of modern-day humans. We confirm that East Asians had somewhat higher initial levels of Neanderthal ancestry than Europeans even after accounting for selection. We find that the bulk of purifying selection against Neanderthal ancestry is best understood as acting on many weakly deleterious alleles. We propose that the majority of these alleles were effectively neutral-and segregating at high frequency-in Neanderthals, but became selected against after entering human populations of much larger effective size. While individually of small effect, these alleles potentially imposed a heavy genetic load on the early-generation human-Neanderthal hybrids. This work suggests that differences in effective population size may play a far more important role in shaping levels of introgression than previously thought.

MeSH Terms
Alleles Animals Asians/genetics Gene Frequency Genetics, Population Genome, Human Haplotypes Humans Hybridization, Genetic Neanderthals/genetics Phylogeny Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide Selection, Genetic/genetics Whites
Authors & Affiliations
3 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Juric Ivan
Center for Population Biology, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America. | Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.
Aeschbacher Simon
Center for Population Biology, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America. | Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.
Coop Graham ORCID
Center for Population Biology, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America. | Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.
Conflict of Interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References (57)
57 references, click to expand
  1. The evolution of postzygotic isolation: accumulating Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities.
    Evolution. 2001 Jun;55(6):1085-94 PMID: 11475044
  2. Deleterious mutations in a hybrid zone: can mutational load decrease the barrier to gene flow?
    Genet Res. 2002 Dec;80(3):197-204 PMID: 12688658
  3. No evidence of Neandertal mtDNA contribution to early modern humans.
    PLoS Biol. 2004 Mar;2(3):E57 PMID: 15024415
  4. Rates of evolution of hybrid inviability in birds and mammals.
    Evolution. 2004 Aug;58(8):1865-70 PMID: 15446440
  5. Modern humans did not admix with Neanderthals during their range expansion into Europe.
    PLoS Biol. 2004 Dec;2(12):e421 PMID: 15562317
  6. Multilocus analysis of introgression between two sympatric sister species of Drosophila: Drosophila yakuba and D. santomea.
    Genetics. 2005 Sep;171(1):197-210 PMID: 15965264
  7. Widespread correlations between dominance and homozygous effects of mutations: implications for theories of dominance.
    Genetics. 2005 Sep;171(1):385-92 PMID: 15972465
  8. Timing and tempo of primate speciation.
    J Evol Biol. 2006 Jan;19(1):59-65 PMID: 16405577
  9. Extensive introgression of mitochondrial DNA relative to nuclear genes in the Drosophila yakuba species group.
    Evolution. 2006 Feb;60(2):292-302 PMID: 16610321
  10. Evolution on the X chromosome: unusual patterns and processes.
    Nat Rev Genet. 2006 Aug;7(8):645-53 PMID: 16847464
  11. Sequencing and analysis of Neanderthal genomic DNA.
    Science. 2006 Nov 17;314(5802):1113-8 PMID: 17110569
  12. Assessing the evolutionary impact of amino acid mutations in the human genome.
    PLoS Genet. 2008 May 30;4(5):e1000083 PMID: 18516229
  13. Widespread genomic signatures of natural selection in hominid evolution.
    PLoS Genet. 2009 May;5(5):e1000471 PMID: 19424416
  14. Out of Africa: modern human origins special feature: the meaning of neandertal skeletal morphology.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 22;106(38):16028-33 PMID: 19805258
  15. A draft sequence of the Neandertal genome.
    Science. 2010 May 7;328(5979):710-722 PMID: 20448178
  16. Fine-scale recombination rate differences between sexes, populations and individuals.
    Nature. 2010 Oct 28;467(7319):1099-103 PMID: 20981099
  17. Inferences about the distribution of dominance drawn from yeast gene knockout data.
    Genetics. 2011 Feb;187(2):553-66 PMID: 21098719
  18. Genetic history of an archaic hominin group from Denisova Cave in Siberia.
    Nature. 2010 Dec 23;468(7327):1053-60 PMID: 21179161
  19. Pervasive adaptive protein evolution apparent in diversity patterns around amino acid substitutions in Drosophila simulans.
    PLoS Genet. 2011 Feb 10;7(2):e1001302 PMID: 21347283
  20. Strong reproductive isolation between humans and Neanderthals inferred from observed patterns of introgression.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Sep 13;108(37):15129-34 PMID: 21911389
  21. A high-coverage genome sequence from an archaic Denisovan individual.
    Science. 2012 Oct 12;338(6104):222-6 PMID: 22936568
  22. The date of interbreeding between Neandertals and modern humans.
    PLoS Genet. 2012;8(10):e1002947 PMID: 23055938
  23. Higher levels of neanderthal ancestry in East Asians than in Europeans.
    Genetics. 2013 May;194(1):199-209 PMID: 23410836
  24. The faster-X effect: integrating theory and data.
    Trends Genet. 2013 Sep;29(9):537-44 PMID: 23790324
  25. Why we are not dead one hundred times over.
    Evolution. 2013 Nov;67(11):3354-61 PMID: 24152012
  26. The complete genome sequence of a Neanderthal from the Altai Mountains.
    Nature. 2014 Jan 2;505(7481):43-9 PMID: 24352235
  27. Resurrecting surviving Neandertal lineages from modern human genomes.
    Science. 2014 Feb 28;343(6174):1017-21 PMID: 24476670
  28. The genomic landscape of Neanderthal ancestry in present-day humans.
    Nature. 2014 Mar 20;507(7492):354-7 PMID: 24476815
  29. Human evolution. Neandertals and moderns made imperfect mates.
    Science. 2014 Jan 31;343(6170):471-2 PMID: 24482455
  30. Neanderthal ancestry drives evolution of lipid catabolism in contemporary Europeans.
    Nat Commun. 2014 Apr 01;5:3584 PMID: 24690587
  31. Patterns of coding variation in the complete exomes of three Neandertals.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 6;111(18):6666-71 PMID: 24753607
  32. Genome sequence of a 45,000-year-old modern human from western Siberia.
    Nature. 2014 Oct 23;514(7523):445-9 PMID: 25341783
  33. The evolution and functional impact of human deletion variants shared with archaic hominin genomes.
    Mol Biol Evol. 2015 Apr;32(4):1008-19 PMID: 25556237
  34. No evidence that selection has been less effective at removing deleterious mutations in Europeans than in Africans.
    Nat Genet. 2015 Feb;47(2):126-31 PMID: 25581429
  35. Complex history of admixture between modern humans and Neandertals.
    Am J Hum Genet. 2015 Mar 5;96(3):448-53 PMID: 25683119
  36. Selection and reduced population size cannot explain higher amounts of Neandertal ancestry in East Asian than in European human populations.
    Am J Hum Genet. 2015 Mar 5;96(3):454-61 PMID: 25683122
  37. Evidence for archaic adaptive introgression in humans.
    Nat Rev Genet. 2015 Jun;16(6):359-71 PMID: 25963373
  38. An early modern human from Romania with a recent Neanderthal ancestor.
    Nature. 2015 Aug 13;524(7564):216-9 PMID: 26098372
  39. The Pace of Hybrid Incompatibility Evolution in House Mice.
    Genetics. 2015 Sep;201(1):229-42 PMID: 26199234
  40. Strong Selective Sweeps on the X Chromosome in the Human-Chimpanzee Ancestor Explain Its Low Divergence.
    PLoS Genet. 2015 Aug 14;11(8):e1005451 PMID: 26274919
  41. Chromosomal Rearrangements as Barriers to Genetic Homogenization between Archaic and Modern Humans.
    Mol Biol Evol. 2015 Dec;32(12):3064-78 PMID: 26399483
  42. Ancient hybridization and genomic stabilization in a swordtail fish.
    Mol Ecol. 2016 Jun;25(11):2661-79 PMID: 26937625
  43. Excavating Neandertal and Denisovan DNA from the genomes of Melanesian individuals.
    Science. 2016 Apr 8;352(6282):235-9 PMID: 26989198
  44. The Combined Landscape of Denisovan and Neanderthal Ancestry in Present-Day Humans.
    Curr Biol. 2016 May 9;26(9):1241-7 PMID: 27032491
  45. The Genetic Cost of Neanderthal Introgression.
    Genetics. 2016 Jun;203(2):881-91 PMID: 27038113
  46. The genetic history of Ice Age Europe.
    Nature. 2016 May 02;534(7606):200-5 PMID: 27135931
  47. A Genomic Map of the Effects of Linked Selection in Drosophila.
    PLoS Genet. 2016 Aug 18;12(8):e1006130 PMID: 27536991
  48. HARD AND SOFT SELECTION REVISITED.
    Evolution. 1975 Sep;29(3):465-473 PMID: 28563194
  49. NEUTRAL GENE FLOW ACROSS SINGLE LOCUS CLINES.
    Evolution. 1998 Oct;52(5):1277-1284 PMID: 28565387
  50. HYBRID ZONES WITH DOBZHANSKY-TYPE EPISTATIC SELECTION.
    Evolution. 1997 Aug;51(4):1027-1035 PMID: 28565489
  51. Population-genomic inference of the strength and timing of selection against gene flow.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 3;114(27):7061-7066 PMID: 28634295
  52. The barrier to genetic exchange between hybridising populations.
    Heredity (Edinb). 1986 Dec;57 ( Pt 3):357-76 PMID: 3804765
  53. The effect on neutral gene flow of selection at a linked locus.
    Theor Popul Biol. 1983 Jun;23(3):300-13 PMID: 6623407
  54. Contamination of the genome by very slightly deleterious mutations: why have we not died 100 times over?
    J Theor Biol. 1995 Aug 21;175(4):583-94 PMID: 7475094
  55. The population genetics of speciation: the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities.
    Genetics. 1995 Apr;139(4):1805-13 PMID: 7789779
  56. Analysis of a genetic hitchhiking model, and its application to DNA polymorphism data from Drosophila melanogaster.
    Mol Biol Evol. 1993 Jul;10(4):842-54 PMID: 8355603
  57. The effects of local selection, balanced polymorphism and background selection on equilibrium patterns of genetic diversity in subdivided populations.
    Genet Res. 1997 Oct;70(2):155-74 PMID: 9449192
Article Info
Journal
PLoS genetics
Abbr.
PLoS Genet
ISSN
1553-7404
Published
2016-11-00
Epub
2016-00-08
Pages
e1006340
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
101239074
PMCID
PMC5100956
Subset
IM
Grants
NIGMS NIH HHS · R01 GM108779 · United States
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com