Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 2693662 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Vascular (humoral) rejection in heart transplantation: pathologic observations and clinical implications.

The Journal of heart transplantation ·Vol. 8 ·No. 6 ·1989-00-00 ·Pages 430-43

Hammond EH, Yowell RL, Nunoda S, Menlove RL, Renlund DG, Bristow MR, Gay WA, Jones KW, O'Connell JB

Abstract

We prospectively studied 551 sequential endomyocardial biopsies from 36 consecutive cardiac allografts. With the use of a combination of light microscopy (including careful evaluation of vascular changes) and immunofluorescence to detect the deposition of immunoglobulin and complement, we identified three patterns of allograft rejection, designated as cellular rejection, vascular (humoral) rejection, and mixed rejection. Cellular rejection was diagnosed with modified Billingham criteria. Vascular rejection was diagnosed by finding the combination of prominent endothelial cell swelling and/or vasculitis on light microscopy and the vascular deposition of immunoglobulin and complement by immunofluorescence. In such patients, cellular lymphoid infiltrates were uniformly absent at the time the vascular changes were detected. Mixed rejection consisted of findings of both cellular and vascular rejection occurring simultaneously. Twenty of 36 allografts exhibited cellular rejection; seven allografts showed vascular rejection, and nine allografts developed mixed rejection. The vascular (humoral) pattern of rejection was important to identify because the patients with this type of rejection had a significantly decreased survival compared with that of patients with cellular rejection (p less than 0.05). Survival in the mixed rejection category was intermediate. Positive donor-specific cross-match and/or panel-reactive antibody greater than or equal to 5% and systolic dysfunction were seen in three of the seven allografts with vascular (humoral) rejection but not in the other types. In the early period after transplant (up to 3 weeks after transplant), the only reliable identifying characteristics of patients with vascular (humoral) rejection were the presence of vascular immunoglobulin and complement assessed by immunofluorescence and endothelial cell swelling and interstitial edema as confirmed by histologic examination. We conclude that immunofluorescence should be routinely done on all heart biopsies for the first month after transplantation. Patients with vascular (humoral) rejection cannot be reliably identified by any other means.

MeSH Terms
Adult Complement System Proteins/metabolism Female Fluorescent Antibody Technique Graft Rejection HLA-DR Antigens/metabolism Heart Transplantation/immunology,pathology Humans Immunoglobulins/metabolism Male Middle Aged Prospective Studies
Chemicals
HLA-DR Antigens Immunoglobulins Complement System Proteins
Authors & Affiliations
9 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Hammond E H
Department of Pathology, University of Utah College of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Yowell R L
Nunoda S
Menlove R L
Renlund D G
Bristow M R
Gay W A
Jones K W
O'Connell J B
Article Info
Journal
The Journal of heart transplantation
Abbr.
J Heart Transplant
ISSN
0887-2570
Published
1989-00-00
Pages
430-43
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
8604172
Subset
IM
Corrections
CommentIn
External Links
PubMed source
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com