Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 26719971 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Association of Depressed Anti-HER2 T-Helper Type 1 Response With Recurrence in Patients With Completely Treated HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: Role for Immune Monitoring.

JAMA oncology ·Vol. 2 ·No. 2 ·2016-02-00 ·Pages 242-6

Datta J, Fracol M, McMillan MT, Berk E, Xu S, Goodman N, Lewis DA, DeMichele A, Czerniecki BJ

Abstract

There is a paucity of immune signatures identifying patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive invasive breast cancer (IBC) at risk for treatment failure following trastuzumab and chemotherapy. To determine whether circulating anti-HER2 CD4-positive (CD4+) T-helper type 1 (Th1) immunity correlates with recurrence in patients with completely treated HER2-positive IBC. Hypothesis-generating exploratory translational analysis at a tertiary care referral center of patients with completely treated HER2-positive IBC with median (interquartile range) follow-up of 44 (31) months. Anti-HER2 Th1 responses were examined using peripheral blood mononuclear cells pulsed with 6 HER2-derived class II-promiscuous peptides via interferon-γ (IFN-γ) enzyme-linked immunospot assay. T-helper type 1 response metrics were anti-HER2 responsivity, repertoire (number of reactive peptides), and cumulative response across 6 peptides (spot-forming cells [SFCs]/106 cells). Anti-HER2 Th1 responses in treatment-naive patients (used as an immunologic baseline) were compared with those in patients completing trastuzumab and chemotherapy; in the latter group, analyses were stratified by recurrence status. Recurrence was defined as any locoregional or distant breast event, or both. Cox regression analysis estimated the instantaneous hazard of recurrence (ie, disease-free survival [DFS]) stratified by anti-HER2 Th1 responsivity. In 95 women with HER2-positive IBC (median [range] age, 49 [24-85] years; 22 treatment-naive, 73 treated with trastuzumab and chemotherapy), depressed anti-HER2 Th1 responsivity (recurrence, 2 of 25 [8%], vs nonrecurrence, 40 of 48 [83%]; P < .001), mean (SD) repertoire (0.1 [0.1] vs 1.5[0.2]; P < .001), and mean (SD) cumulative response (14.8 [2.0] vs 80.2 [11.0] SFCs/106 cells; P < .001) were observed in patients incurring recurrence (n = 25) compared with patients without recurrence (n = 48). After controlling for confounding, anti-HER2 Th1 responsivity remained independently associated with recurrence (P < .001). This immune disparity was mediated by anti-HER2 CD4+T-bet+IFN-γ+ (Th1)-not CD4+GATA-3+IFN-γ+ (Th2) or CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ (Treg)-phenotypes, and not attributable to immune incompetence. When stratifying trastuzumab plus chemotherapy-treated patients by Th1 responsivity, Th1-nonresponsive patients demonstrated a worse DFS (median, 47 vs 113 months; P < .001) compared with Th1-responsive patients (hazard ratio, 16.9 [95% CI, 3.9-71.4]; P < .001). Depressed anti-HER2 Th1 response is a novel immune correlate to recurrence in patients with completely treated HER2-positive IBC. These data underscore a role for immune monitoring in patients with HER2-positive IBC to identify vulnerable populations at risk of treatment failure.

MeSH Terms
Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy,enzymology,immunology,pathology Cells, Cultured Disease-Free Survival Female Humans Middle Aged Monitoring, Immunologic Neoplasm Recurrence, Local Philadelphia Predictive Value of Tests Prospective Studies Receptor, ErbB-2/antagonists & inhibitors,immunology,metabolism Risk Assessment Risk Factors Tertiary Care Centers Th1 Cells/drug effects,immunology Time Factors Trastuzumab/therapeutic use Treatment Failure Young Adult
Chemicals
Antineoplastic Agents ERBB2 protein, human Receptor, ErbB-2 Trastuzumab
Authors & Affiliations
9 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Datta Jashodeep
Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Fracol Megan
Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
McMillan Matthew T
Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Berk Erik
Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Xu Shuwen
Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Goodman Noah
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Lewis David A
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
DeMichele Angela
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia3Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Czerniecki Brian J
Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia4Rena Rowen Breast Center, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Article Info
Journal
JAMA oncology
Abbr.
JAMA Oncol
ISSN
2374-2445
Published
2016-02-00
Pages
242-6
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
101652861
Subset
IM
Grants
NCI NIH HHS · R01 CA096997 · United States
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com