Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 26260773 Published · epublish English Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Resolving bundled microtubules using anti-tubulin nanobodies.

Nature communications ·Vol. 6 ·2015-08-11 ·Pages 7933

Mikhaylova M, Cloin BM, Finan K, van den Berg R, Teeuw J, Kijanka MM, Sokolowski M, Katrukha EA, Maidorn M, Opazo F, Moutel S, Vantard M, Perez F, van Bergen en Henegouwen PM, Hoogenraad CC, Ewers H, Kapitein LC

Abstract

Microtubules are hollow biopolymers of 25-nm diameter and are key constituents of the cytoskeleton. In neurons, microtubules are organized differently between axons and dendrites, but their precise organization in different compartments is not completely understood. Super-resolution microscopy techniques can detect specific structures at an increased resolution, but the narrow spacing between neuronal microtubules poses challenges because most existing labelling strategies increase the effective microtubule diameter by 20-40 nm and will thereby blend neighbouring microtubules into one structure. Here we develop single-chain antibody fragments (nanobodies) against tubulin to achieve super-resolution imaging of microtubules with a decreased apparent diameter. To test the resolving power of these novel probes, we generate microtubule bundles with a known spacing of 50-70 nm and successfully resolve individual microtubules. Individual bundled microtubules can also be resolved in different mammalian cells, including hippocampal neurons, allowing novel insights into fundamental mechanisms of microtubule organization in cell- and neurobiology.

MeSH Terms
Animals Antibodies Cell Line Computer Simulation Humans Microscopy/methods Microtubules/ultrastructure Single-Domain Antibodies
Chemicals
Antibodies Single-Domain Antibodies
Authors & Affiliations
17 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Mikhaylova Marina
1] Division of Cell Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht 3584 CH, The Netherlands [2] RG Neuroplasticity, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Brenneckestr. 6, Magdeburg 39118, Germany.
Cloin Bas M C
Division of Cell Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht 3584 CH, The Netherlands.
Finan Kieran
Randall Division of Cell and Molecular Biophysics, King's College London, Guy's Campus, London SE1 1UL, UK.
van den Berg Robert ORCID
Division of Cell Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht 3584 CH, The Netherlands.
Teeuw Jalmar ORCID
Division of Cell Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht 3584 CH, The Netherlands.
Kijanka Marta M
Division of Cell Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht 3584 CH, The Netherlands.
Sokolowski Mikolaj
Division of Cell Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht 3584 CH, The Netherlands.
Katrukha Eugene A
Division of Cell Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht 3584 CH, The Netherlands.
Maidorn Manuel
Department of Neuro- and Sensory Physiology, University of Göttingen, Humboldtallee 23, Göttingen 37073, Germany.
Opazo Felipe
Department of Neuro- and Sensory Physiology, University of Göttingen, Humboldtallee 23, Göttingen 37073, Germany.
Moutel Sandrine
1] Institut Curie, Research Center, 26, rue d'Ulm, Paris, F-75248, France [2] CNRS UMR144, 26, rue d'Ulm, Paris, France [3] Translational Research Department, Institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, Paris F-75248, France.
Vantard Marylin
Inserm, U836, F-38000, Grenoble, France. Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences, Grenoble F-38000, France.
Perez Frank
1] Institut Curie, Research Center, 26, rue d'Ulm, Paris, F-75248, France [2] CNRS UMR144, 26, rue d'Ulm, Paris, France.
van Bergen en Henegouwen Paul M P
Division of Cell Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht 3584 CH, The Netherlands.
Hoogenraad Casper C
Division of Cell Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht 3584 CH, The Netherlands.
Ewers Helge ORCID
Randall Division of Cell and Molecular Biophysics, King's College London, Guy's Campus, London SE1 1UL, UK.
Kapitein Lukas C
Division of Cell Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht 3584 CH, The Netherlands.
References (17)
17 references, click to expand
  1. Super-duper resolution imaging of mitotic microtubules.
    Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015 Feb;16(2):67 PMID: 25560969
  2. Microtubule dynamics in dendritic spines.
    Methods Cell Biol. 2010;97:111-32 PMID: 20719268
  3. Which way to go? Cytoskeletal organization and polarized transport in neurons.
    Mol Cell Neurosci. 2011 Jan;46(1):9-20 PMID: 20817096
  4. Three-dimensional sub-100 nm resolution fluorescence microscopy of thick samples.
    Nat Methods. 2008 Jun;5(6):527-9 PMID: 18469823
  5. End-binding proteins sensitize microtubules to the action of microtubule-targeting agents.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 May 28;110(22):8900-5 PMID: 23674690
  6. Rapid optical imaging of human breast tumour xenografts using anti-HER2 VHHs site-directly conjugated to IRDye 800CW for image-guided surgery.
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013 Oct;40(11):1718-29 PMID: 23778558
  7. Measuring image resolution in optical nanoscopy.
    Nat Methods. 2013 Jun;10(6):557-62 PMID: 23624665
  8. Recombinant antibodies against subcellular fractions used to track endogenous Golgi protein dynamics in vivo.
    Traffic. 2003 Nov;4(11):739-53 PMID: 14617357
  9. Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM).
    Nat Methods. 2006 Oct;3(10):793-5 PMID: 16896339
  10. A simple, versatile method for GFP-based super-resolution microscopy via nanobodies.
    Nat Methods. 2012 Jun;9(6):582-4 PMID: 22543348
  11. Subdiffraction-resolution fluorescence imaging with conventional fluorescent probes.
    Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2008;47(33):6172-6 PMID: 18646237
  12. Computer control of microscopes using µManager.
    Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2010 Oct;Chapter 14:Unit14.20 PMID: 20890901
  13. Projection domains of MAP2 and tau determine spacings between microtubules in dendrites and axons.
    Nature. 1992 Dec 17;360(6405):674-7 PMID: 1465130
  14. Evaluation of fluorophores for optimal performance in localization-based super-resolution imaging.
    Nat Methods. 2011 Nov 06;8(12):1027-36 PMID: 22056676
  15. Two microtubule-associated proteins of Arabidopsis MAP65s promote antiparallel microtubule bundling.
    Mol Biol Cell. 2008 Oct;19(10):4534-44 PMID: 18667529
  16. Fluorogenic probes for live-cell imaging of the cytoskeleton.
    Nat Methods. 2014 Jul;11(7):731-3 PMID: 24859753
  17. Imaging intracellular fluorescent proteins at nanometer resolution.
    Science. 2006 Sep 15;313(5793):1642-5 PMID: 16902090
Article Info
Journal
Nature communications
Abbr.
Nat Commun
ISSN
2041-1723
Published
2015-08-11
Epub
2015-00-11
Pages
7933
Language
English
Region
England
NLM ID
101528555
PMCID
PMC4918323
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com