Opinion: Reproducible research can still be wrong: adopting a prevention approach.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America ·Vol. 112 ·No. 6 ·2015-02-10 ·Pages 1645-6

Leek JT, Peng RD

Abstract

暂无摘要

MeSH Terms

Peer Review/methods,standards Reproducibility of Results Research/standards Research Design

Authors & Affiliations

2 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID

Leek Jeffrey T

Associate Professor of Biostatistics and Oncology and jtleek@jhu.edu.

Peng Roger D

Associate Professor of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.

References (4)

4 references, click to expand

Why most published research findings are false.
PLoS Med. 2005 Aug;2(8):e124 PMID: 16060722
An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature.
Biostatistics. 2014 Jan;15(1):1-12 PMID: 24068246
Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences.
Genome Biol. 2010;11(8):R86 PMID: 20738864
A randomized trial in a massive online open course shows people don't know what a statistically significant relationship looks like, but they can learn.
PeerJ. 2014 Oct 16;2:e589 PMID: 25337457

Article Info

Journal

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Abbr.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

ISSN

1091-6490

DOI

Published

2015-02-10

Pages

1645-6

Language

English

Region

United States

NLM ID

7505876

PMCID

PMC4330755

Subset

External Links

Analysis Services