Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 25524798 Published · ppublish English Clinical Trial, Phase II Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Video-Audio Media

The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone as first-line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-1/TRIO-18): a randomised phase 2 study.

The Lancet. Oncology ·Vol. 16 ·No. 1 ·2015-01-00 ·Pages 25-35

Finn RS, Crown JP, Lang I, Boer K, Bondarenko IM, Kulyk SO, Ettl J, Patel R, Pinter T, Schmidt M, Shparyk Y, Thummala AR, Voytko NL, Fowst C, Huang X, Kim ST, Randolph S, Slamon DJ

Abstract

Palbociclib (PD-0332991) is an oral, small-molecule inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) 4 and 6 with preclinical evidence of growth-inhibitory activity in oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells and synergy with anti-oestrogens. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of palbociclib in combination with letrozole as first-line treatment of patients with advanced, oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. In this open-label, randomised phase 2 study, postmenopausal women with advanced oestrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer who had not received any systemic treatment for their advanced disease were eligible to participate. Patients were enrolled in two separate cohorts that accrued sequentially: in cohort 1, patients were enrolled on the basis of their oestrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative biomarker status alone, whereas in cohort 2 they were also required to have cancers with amplification of cyclin D1 (CCND1), loss of p16 (INK4A or CDKN2A), or both. In both cohorts, patients were randomly assigned 1:1 via an interactive web-based randomisation system, stratified by disease site and disease-free interval, to receive continuous oral letrozole 2.5 mg daily or continuous oral letrozole 2.5 mg daily plus oral palbociclib 125 mg, given once daily for 3 weeks followed by 1 week off over 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Accrual to cohort 2 was stopped after an unplanned interim analysis of cohort 1 and the statistical analysis plan for the primary endpoint was amended to a combined analysis of cohorts 1 and 2 (instead of cohort 2 alone). The study is ongoing but closed to accrual; these are the results of the final analysis of progression-free survival. The study is registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00721409. Between Dec 22, 2009, and May 12, 2012, we randomly assigned 165 patients, 84 to palbociclib plus letrozole and 81 to letrozole alone. At the time of the final analysis for progression-free survival (median follow-up 29.6 months [95% CI 27.9-36.0] for the palbociclib plus letrozole group and 27.9 months [25.5-31.1] for the letrozole group), 41 progression-free survival events had occurred in the palbociclib plus letrozole group and 59 in the letrozole group. Median progression-free survival was 10.2 months (95% CI 5.7-12.6) for the letrozole group and 20.2 months (13.8-27.5) for the palbociclib plus letrozole group (HR 0.488, 95% CI 0.319-0.748; one-sided p=0.0004). In cohort 1 (n=66), median progression-free survival was 5.7 months (2.6-10.5) for the letrozole group and 26.1 months (11.2-not estimable) for the palbociclib plus letrozole group (HR 0.299, 0.156-0.572; one-sided p<0.0001); in cohort 2 (n=99), median progression-free survival was 11.1 months (7.1-16.4) for the letrozole group and 18.1 months (13.1-27.5) for the palbociclib plus letrozole group (HR 0.508, 0.303-0.853; one-sided p=0.0046). Grade 3-4 neutropenia was reported in 45 (54%) of 83 patients in the palbociclib plus letrozole group versus one (1%) of 77 patients in the letrozole group, leucopenia in 16 (19%) versus none, and fatigue in four (4%) versus one (1%). Serious adverse events that occurred in more than one patient in the palbociclib plus letrozole group were pulmonary embolism (three [4%] patients), back pain (two [2%]), and diarrhoea (two [2%]). No cases of febrile neutropenia or neutropenia-related infections were reported during the study. 11 (13%) patients in the palbociclib plus letrozole group and two (2%) in the letrozole group discontinued the study because of adverse events. The addition of palbociclib to letrozole in this phase 2 study significantly improved progression-free survival in women with advanced oestrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer. A phase 3 trial is currently underway. Pfizer.

MeSH Terms
Administration, Oral Aged Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects,therapeutic use Aromatase Inhibitors/administration & dosage Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis,genetics Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy,enzymology,genetics,pathology Cyclin D1/genetics Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/antagonists & inhibitors,metabolism Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6/antagonists & inhibitors,metabolism Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16/genetics Disease-Free Survival Drug Administration Schedule Europe Female Humans Intention to Treat Analysis Letrozole Middle Aged Molecular Targeted Therapy Nitriles/administration & dosage North America Piperazines/administration & dosage Postmenopause Proportional Hazards Models Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage Pyridines/administration & dosage Receptor, ErbB-2/analysis,genetics Receptors, Estrogen/analysis Republic of Korea South Africa Time Factors Treatment Outcome Triazoles/administration & dosage
Chemicals
Aromatase Inhibitors Biomarkers, Tumor CCND1 protein, human Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16 Nitriles Piperazines Protein Kinase Inhibitors Pyridines Receptors, Estrogen Triazoles Cyclin D1 Letrozole ERBB2 protein, human Receptor, ErbB-2 CDK4 protein, human CDK6 protein, human Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4 Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6 palbociclib
Authors & Affiliations
18 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Finn Richard S
University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Crown John P
Irish Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Dublin, Ireland.
Lang Istvan
Orszagos Onkologiai Intezet, Budapest, Hungary.
Boer Katalin
Szent Margit Korhaz, Onkologia, Budapest, Hungary.
Bondarenko Igor M
Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy, City Multiple-Discipline Clinical Hospital 4, Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine.
Kulyk Sergey O
Municipal Treatment and Prophylactic Institution, Donetsk, Ukraine.
Ettl Johannes
Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Patel Ravindranath
Comprehensive Blood and Cancer Center, Bakersfield, CA, USA.
Pinter Tamas
Petz Aladar Megyei Oktato Korhaz, Gyor, Hungary.
Schmidt Marcus
University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Shparyk Yaroslav
Lviv State Oncologic Regional Treatment and Diagnostic Centre, Lviv, Ukraine.
Thummala Anu R
Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
Voytko Nataliya L
Kyiv City Clinical Oncology Centre, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Fowst Camilla
Pfizer Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Huang Xin
Pfizer Oncology, San Diego, CA, USA.
Kim Sindy T
Pfizer Oncology, San Diego, CA, USA.
Randolph Sophia
Pfizer Oncology, San Diego, CA, USA.
Slamon Dennis J
University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: dslamon@mednet.ucla.edu.
Article Info
Journal
The Lancet. Oncology
Abbr.
Lancet Oncol
ISSN
1474-5488
Published
2015-01-00
Epub
2014-00-16
Pages
25-35
Language
English
Region
England
NLM ID
100957246
Subset
IM
Databases
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT00721409
Corrections
CommentIn
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com