Abstract
In a phase 1-2 trial of albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) plus gemcitabine, substantial clinical activity was noted in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. We conducted a phase 3 study of the efficacy and safety of the combination versus gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. We randomly assigned patients with a Karnofsky performance-status score of 70 or more (on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better performance status) to nab-paclitaxel (125 mg per square meter of body-surface area) followed by gemcitabine (1000 mg per square meter) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks or gemcitabine monotherapy (1000 mg per square meter) weekly for 7 of 8 weeks (cycle 1) and then on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks (cycle 2 and subsequent cycles). Patients received the study treatment until disease progression. The primary end point was overall survival; secondary end points were progression-free survival and overall response rate. A total of 861 patients were randomly assigned to nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (431 patients) or gemcitabine (430). The median overall survival was 8.5 months in the nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine group as compared with 6.7 months in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio for death, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62 to 0.83; P<0.001). The survival rate was 35% in the nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine group versus 22% in the gemcitabine group at 1 year, and 9% versus 4% at 2 years. The median progression-free survival was 5.5 months in the nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine group, as compared with 3.7 months in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.82; P<0.001); the response rate according to independent review was 23% versus 7% in the two groups (P<0.001). The most common adverse events of grade 3 or higher were neutropenia (38% in the nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine group vs. 27% in the gemcitabine group), fatigue (17% vs. 7%), and neuropathy (17% vs. 1%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 3% versus 1% of the patients in the two groups. In the nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine group, neuropathy of grade 3 or higher improved to grade 1 or lower in a median of 29 days. In patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine significantly improved overall survival, progression-free survival, and response rate, but rates of peripheral neuropathy and myelosuppression were increased. (Funded by Celgene; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00844649.).
MeSH Terms
Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy,mortality
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Albumins/adverse effects,therapeutic use
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/adverse effects,therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects,therapeutic use
Deoxycytidine/adverse effects,analogs & derivatives,therapeutic use
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Middle Aged
Nervous System Diseases/chemically induced
Neutropenia/chemically induced
Paclitaxel/adverse effects,therapeutic use
Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy,mortality
Chemicals
130-nm albumin-bound paclitaxel
Albumins
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
Deoxycytidine
gemcitabine
Paclitaxel
Authors & Affiliations
23 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Von Hoff Daniel D
From the Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, and Virginia G. Piper Cancer Center, Scottsdale - both in Arizona (D.D.V.H., R.K.R.); Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers, FL (T.E.); Arena Oncology Associates, Lake Success (F.P.A.), and Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo (W.W.M.) - both in New York; University of Washington, Seattle (E.G.C.); Sarah Cannon Research Institute-Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (J. Infante); Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto (M.M.); Atlanta Cancer Care (T.S.) and Georgia Cancer Specialists (M.N.S.) - both in Atlanta; Blokhin Cancer Research Center, Moscow (S.A.T.); Southern Health, East Bentleigh, VIC (M.H.), Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney (D.G.), and Bionomics, Thebarton, SA (J. Iglesias) - all in Australia; San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan (M.R.); Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada (S.D.); Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore (D.L.); University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh (N.B.); Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona (J.T.); Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal, Madrid (M.H.); University Hospitals Leuven and Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (E.V.C.); and Celgene, Summit, NJ (X.W., M.F.R.).
Ervin Thomas
Arena Francis P
Chiorean E Gabriela
Infante Jeffrey
Moore Malcolm
Seay Thomas
Tjulandin Sergei A
Ma Wen Wee
Saleh Mansoor N
Harris Marion
Reni Michele
Dowden Scot
Laheru Daniel
Bahary Nathan
Ramanathan Ramesh K
Tabernero Josep
Hidalgo Manuel
Goldstein David
Van Cutsem Eric
Wei Xinyu
Iglesias Jose
Renschler Markus F
References (22)
22 references, click to expand
-
Randomized phase III study of exatecan and gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in untreated advanced pancreatic cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Sep 20;24(27):4441-7
PMID: 16983112
-
Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel is an active regimen in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase I/II trial.
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Dec 1;29(34):4548-54
PMID: 21969517
-
Phase III study comparing gemcitabine plus cetuximab versus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Southwest Oncology Group-directed intergroup trial S0205.
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Aug 1;28(22):3605-10
PMID: 20606093
-
Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 change during chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Cancer. 2009 Jun 15;115(12):2630-9
PMID: 19353729
-
FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer.
N Engl J Med. 2011 May 12;364(19):1817-25
PMID: 21561347
-
Phase III trial of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel compared with polyethylated castor oil-based paclitaxel in women with breast cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Nov 1;23(31):7794-803
PMID: 16172456
-
A phase III trial of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine in patients with unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Ann Oncol. 2005 Oct;16(10):1639-45
PMID: 16087696
-
nab-Paclitaxel potentiates gemcitabine activity by reducing cytidine deaminase levels in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer.
Cancer Discov. 2012 Mar;2(3):260-269
PMID: 22585996
-
Phase III randomized comparison of gemcitabine versus gemcitabine plus capecitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 20;27(33):5513-8
PMID: 19858379
-
A multicenter phase III trial comparing irinotecan-gemcitabine (IG) with gemcitabine (G) monotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Br J Cancer. 2006 Sep 4;95(5):587-92
PMID: 16909140
-
New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Feb 2;92(3):205-16
PMID: 10655437
-
Good clinical practice research guidelines reviewed, emphasis given to responsibilities of investigators: second article in a series.
J Oncol Pract. 2008 Sep;4(5):233-5
PMID: 20856703
-
Phase III, randomized study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin versus gemcitabine (fixed-dose rate infusion) compared with gemcitabine (30-minute infusion) in patients with pancreatic carcinoma E6201: a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug 10;27(23):3778-85
PMID: 19581537
-
Irinotecan plus gemcitabine results in no survival advantage compared with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer despite increased tumor response rate.
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Sep 15;22(18):3776-83
PMID: 15365074
-
Gemcitabine plus bevacizumab compared with gemcitabine plus placebo in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: phase III trial of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 80303).
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Aug 1;28(22):3617-22
PMID: 20606091
-
Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.
J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 20;25(15):1960-6
PMID: 17452677
-
Karnofsky and ECOG performance status scoring in lung cancer: a prospective, longitudinal study of 536 patients from a single institution.
Eur J Cancer. 1996 Jun;32A(7):1135-41
PMID: 8758243
-
Phase III trial comparing intensive induction chemoradiotherapy (60 Gy, infusional 5-FU and intermittent cisplatin) followed by maintenance gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer. Definitive results of the 2000-01 FFCD/SFRO study.
Ann Oncol. 2008 Sep;19(9):1592-9
PMID: 18467316
-
Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial.
J Clin Oncol. 1997 Jun;15(6):2403-13
PMID: 9196156
-
BAYPAN study: a double-blind phase III randomized trial comparing gemcitabine plus sorafenib and gemcitabine plus placebo in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.
Ann Oncol. 2012 Nov;23(11):2799-2805
PMID: 22771827
-
Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin compared with single-agent gemcitabine as first-line treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: the GIP-1 study.
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 1;28(10):1645-51
PMID: 20194854
-
European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2013.
Ann Oncol. 2013 Mar;24(3):792-800
PMID: 23402763