Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 22645525 Published · epublish English Journal Article

Dose-sensitivity, conserved non-coding sequences, and duplicate gene retention through multiple tetraploidies in the grasses.

Frontiers in plant science ·Vol. 2 ·2011-00-00 ·Pages 2

Schnable JC, Pedersen BS, Subramaniam S, Freeling M

Abstract

Whole genome duplications, or tetraploidies, are an important source of increased gene content. Following whole genome duplication, duplicate copies of many genes are lost from the genome. This loss of genes is biased both in the classes of genes deleted and the subgenome from which they are lost. Many or all classes are genes preferentially retained as duplicate copies are engaged in dose sensitive protein-protein interactions, such that deletion of any one duplicate upsets the status quo of subunit concentrations, and presumably lowers fitness as a result. Transcription factors are also preferentially retained following every whole genome duplications studied. This has been explained as a consequence of protein-protein interactions, just as for other highly retained classes of genes. We show that the quantity of conserved noncoding sequences (CNSs) associated with genes predicts the likelihood of their retention as duplicate pairs following whole genome duplication. As many CNSs likely represent binding sites for transcriptional regulators, we propose that the likelihood of gene retention following tetraploidy may also be influenced by dose-sensitive protein-DNA interactions between the regulatory regions of CNS-rich genes - nicknamed bigfoot genes - and the proteins that bind to them. Using grass genomes, we show that differential loss of CNSs from one member of a pair following the pre-grass tetraploidy reduces its chance of retention in the subsequent maize lineage tetraploidy.

Keywords
conserved non-coding sequence fractionation gene dosage gene regulation polyploidy
Authors & Affiliations
4 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Schnable James C
Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California Berkeley Berkeley, CA, USA.
Pedersen Brent S
Subramaniam Sabarinath
Freeling Michael
References (34)
34 references, click to expand
  1. Insights from the comparison of plant genome sequences.
    Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2010;61:349-72 PMID: 20441528
  2. Modeling gene and genome duplications in eukaryotes.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Apr 12;102(15):5454-9 PMID: 15800040
  3. Consequences of genome duplication.
    Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2007 Dec;17(6):505-12 PMID: 18006297
  4. The evolution of transcriptional regulation in eukaryotes.
    Mol Biol Evol. 2003 Sep;20(9):1377-419 PMID: 12777501
  5. Cellular reactions to gene dosage imbalance: genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic effects.
    Trends Genet. 2008 Aug;24(8):390-7 PMID: 18585818
  6. Following tetraploidy in maize, a short deletion mechanism removed genes preferentially from one of the two homologs.
    PLoS Biol. 2010 Jun 29;8(6):e1000409 PMID: 20613864
  7. Close split of sorghum and maize genome progenitors.
    Genome Res. 2004 Oct;14(10A):1916-23 PMID: 15466289
  8. Comparative genomics.
    Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2004;5:15-56 PMID: 15485342
  9. Unravelling angiosperm genome evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromosomal duplication events.
    Nature. 2003 Mar 27;422(6930):433-8 PMID: 12660784
  10. The roles of segmental and tandem gene duplication in the evolution of large gene families in Arabidopsis thaliana.
    BMC Plant Biol. 2004 Jun 01;4:10 PMID: 15171794
  11. Utility and distribution of conserved noncoding sequences in the grasses.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Apr 30;99(9):6147-51 PMID: 11972021
  12. Bias in plant gene content following different sorts of duplication: tandem, whole-genome, segmental, or by transposition.
    Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2009;60:433-53 PMID: 19575588
  13. A generalized model of gene dosage and dominant negative effects in macromolecular complexes.
    FASEB J. 2010 Apr;24(4):994-1002 PMID: 20007508
  14. Biological consequences of dosage dependent gene regulatory systems.
    Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007 May-Jun;1769(5-6):422-8 PMID: 17276527
  15. The 2R hypothesis: an update.
    Curr Opin Immunol. 2007 Oct;19(5):547-52 PMID: 17707623
  16. The Genomes of Oryza sativa: a history of duplications.
    PLoS Biol. 2005 Feb;3(2):e38 PMID: 15685292
  17. Conserved noncoding sequences in the grasses.
    Genome Res. 2003 Sep;13(9):2030-41 PMID: 12952874
  18. Cereal genome evolution. Grasses, line up and form a circle.
    Curr Biol. 1995 Jul 1;5(7):737-9 PMID: 7583118
  19. DNA sequence evidence for the segmental allotetraploid origin of maize.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jun 24;94(13):6809-14 PMID: 11038553
  20. G-boxes, bigfoot genes, and environmental response: characterization of intragenomic conserved noncoding sequences in Arabidopsis.
    Plant Cell. 2007 May;19(5):1441-57 PMID: 17496117
  21. Conserved noncoding sequences among cultivated cereal genomes identify candidate regulatory sequence elements and patterns of promoter evolution.
    Plant Cell. 2003 May;15(5):1143-58 PMID: 12724540
  22. Differentiation of the maize subgenomes by genome dominance and both ancient and ongoing gene loss.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 8;108(10):4069-74 PMID: 21368132
  23. Following tetraploidy in an Arabidopsis ancestor, genes were removed preferentially from one homeolog leaving clusters enriched in dose-sensitive genes.
    Genome Res. 2006 Jul;16(7):934-46 PMID: 16760422
  24. Grasses as a single genetic system: genome composition, collinearity and compatibility.
    Trends Genet. 1993 Aug;9(8):259-61 PMID: 8379002
  25. Finding and comparing syntenic regions among Arabidopsis and the outgroups papaya, poplar, and grape: CoGe with rosids.
    Plant Physiol. 2008 Dec;148(4):1772-81 PMID: 18952863
  26. The collapse of gene complement following whole genome duplication.
    BMC Genomics. 2010 May 19;11:313 PMID: 20482863
  27. Transcriptional enhancers in animal development and evolution.
    Curr Biol. 2010 Sep 14;20(17):R754-63 PMID: 20833320
  28. Pseudoallelism and gene evolution.
    Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1951;16:159-74 PMID: 14942737
  29. Evidence that rice and other cereals are ancient aneuploids.
    Plant Cell. 2003 Sep;15(9):2192-202 PMID: 12953120
  30. The frequency of polyploid speciation in vascular plants.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 18;106(33):13875-9 PMID: 19667210
  31. Ancient polyploidization predating divergence of the cereals, and its consequences for comparative genomics.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jun 29;101(26):9903-8 PMID: 15161969
  32. Dosage balance in gene regulation: biological implications.
    Trends Genet. 2005 Apr;21(4):219-26 PMID: 15797617
  33. Conserved noncoding sequences (CNSs) in higher plants.
    Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2009 Apr;12(2):126-32 PMID: 19249238
  34. Inclusion of neighboring base interdependencies substantially improves genome-wide prokaryotic transcription factor binding site prediction.
    Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Jul;38(12):e135 PMID: 20439311
Article Info
Journal
Frontiers in plant science
Abbr.
Front Plant Sci
ISSN
1664-462X
Published
2011-00-00
Epub
2011-00-10
Pages
2
Language
English
Region
Switzerland
NLM ID
101568200
PMCID
PMC3355796
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com