Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 22417251 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial

Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up.

The New England journal of medicine ·Vol. 366 ·No. 11 ·2012-03-15 ·Pages 981-90

Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Tammela TL, Ciatto S, Nelen V, Kwiatkowski M, Lujan M, Lilja H, Zappa M, Denis LJ, Recker F, Páez A, Määttänen L, Bangma CH, Aus G, Carlsson S, Villers A, Rebillard X, van der Kwast T, Kujala PM, Blijenberg BG, Stenman UH, Huber A, Taari K, Hakama M, Moss SM, de Koning HJ, Auvinen A, ERSPC Investigators

Abstract

Several trials evaluating the effect of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing on prostate-cancer mortality have shown conflicting results. We updated prostate-cancer mortality in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer with 2 additional years of follow-up. The study involved 182,160 men between the ages of 50 and 74 years at entry, with a predefined core age group of 162,388 men 55 to 69 years of age. The trial was conducted in eight European countries. Men who were randomly assigned to the screening group were offered PSA-based screening, whereas those in the control group were not offered such screening. The primary outcome was mortality from prostate cancer. After a median follow-up of 11 years in the core age group, the relative reduction in the risk of death from prostate cancer in the screening group was 21% (rate ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68 to 0.91; P=0.001), and 29% after adjustment for noncompliance. The absolute reduction in mortality in the screening group was 0.10 deaths per 1000 person-years or 1.07 deaths per 1000 men who underwent randomization. The rate ratio for death from prostate cancer during follow-up years 10 and 11 was 0.62 (95% CI, 0.45 to 0.85; P=0.003). To prevent one death from prostate cancer at 11 years of follow-up, 1055 men would need to be invited for screening and 37 cancers would need to be detected. There was no significant between-group difference in all-cause mortality. Analyses after 2 additional years of follow-up consolidated our previous finding that PSA-based screening significantly reduced mortality from prostate cancer but did not affect all-cause mortality. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN49127736.).

MeSH Terms
Age Factors Aged Cause of Death Early Detection of Cancer Follow-Up Studies Humans Kaplan-Meier Estimate Male Middle Aged Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis,mortality,prevention & control Risk
Chemicals
Prostate-Specific Antigen
Authors & Affiliations
30 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Schröder Fritz H
Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. secr.schroder@erasmusmc.nl
Hugosson Jonas
Roobol Monique J
Tammela Teuvo L J
Ciatto Stefano
Nelen Vera
Kwiatkowski Maciej
Lujan Marcos
Lilja Hans
Zappa Marco
Denis Louis J
Recker Franz
Páez Alvaro
Määttänen Liisa
Bangma Chris H
Aus Gunnar
Carlsson Sigrid
Villers Arnauld
Rebillard Xavier
van der Kwast Theodorus
Kujala Paula M
Blijenberg Bert G
Stenman Ulf-Hakan
Huber Andreas
Taari Kimmo
Hakama Matti
Moss Sue M
de Koning Harry J
Auvinen Anssi
ERSPC Investigators
Investigators
165 investigators, click to expand
Kirkels W J
Rietbergen J B W
van der Cruijsen I W
Raaijmakers R
de Vries S H
Roemeling S
Gosselaar C
Wolters T
van den Bergh R C N
van Leeuwen P J
Bul M
Zhu X
van Vugt H A
Yurdakul G
Boeken-Kruger A
Wijburg C
Forouzanfor M
de Boer M
Postma R
Vis A N
Hoedemaeker R
van Leenders A
van Schaik R
van der Maas P J
Otto S
Draisma G
Beemsterboer P
Essink-Bot M
Korfage I
Boer R
Wildhagen M
Heijnsdijk E
Merkelbach W
Hoekstra W
Blom J
Damhuis R A M
Reedijk A
Kranse R
Roobol D W
Roobol W
van den Berg E
de Zwart G-J
Franken-Raab C G A M
van Slooten-Midderig M
Smit A
van der Drift V
de Bilde E
Mani L
Visser-van Dongen M
Versteeg-Leenheer H
Zoutendijk B
Vink N
van Meurs H
de Bruijn A E
Venderbos L D F
Devriendt H
Thijs G
Hermans A
D'Hooge K
Neels H
Wauters A
Neetens I
Kockx M
Keuppens F
Braeckman J
Govaerts F
Spinnewijn B
Van Hoey M
Putzeys T
De Coninck M
Dourcy-Belle-Rose B
Vancauwenbergh A
Coebergh J W
Verhaegen H
Van Vliet
Standaert B
Van Herck L
Nyberg Maria
Bergdahl Svante
Lodding Pär
Khatami Ali
Stranne Johan
Ahlgren Helén
Eriksson Gun-Britt
Becker Charlotte
Carlsson Sigrid
Grenabo Anna
Pettersson Silas
Varenhorst Eberhard
Norlén Bo-Johan
Zackrisson Björn
Holmberg Erik
Frösing Roland
Pileblad Erik
Pihl Carl-Gustaf
Laurila Marita
Ruutu Mirja
Aro Jussi
Juusela Harri
Mildh Markus
Lahtela Jorma
Karhunen Pekka J
Mäkinen Tuukka
Rannikko Antti
Malila Nea
Kilpeläinen Tuomas
Murtola Teemu
Kuivalainen Sanna
Karhunen Tiina
Cappellini Mario
Bianchi Simonetta
Lombardi Claudio
Bussotti Alessandro
Bastiani Paolo
Bonardi Rita
Mazzotta Antonia
Bartoli Dusca
Bonfrisco Liana
Crocetti Emanuele
Martinelli Francesca
Zendron Paola
Frullini Paola
Di Lollo Simonetta
Rubeca Tiziana
Berenguer Antonio
Rodriguez Jose A
Aybar Benita
Seiler Daniel
Baumgartner Martin
Tscholl Reto
Woodtli Elsbeth
Schärer Lydia
Herklotz Roberto
Stamm Bernhard
Wernli Martin
Bodis Stephan
Grobholz Rainer
Bubendorf Lukas
Lehmann Kurt
Schmid Hans-Ruedi
Iselin Hans-Ulrich
Steurer Johann
Kurrer Michael
Malavaud Bernard
Iborra François
Malavaud Sandra
Grosclaude Pascale
Tretarre Brigitte
Bataille Vincent
Bessaoud Faiza
Hemming J
Coulson P
Coleman D
Van der Kwast Th
van Leenders G J
Hoedemaeker R F
Pihl C-G
Martikainen P M
Laurila M
Bubendorf L
Santonja C
Neetens I
DiLollo S
Mazerolles C
Lopes C
References (21)
21 references, click to expand
  1. The effect of study arm on prostate cancer treatment in the large screening trial ERSPC.
    Int J Cancer. 2010 May 15;126(10):2387-93 PMID: 19739124
  2. Number needed to screen: development of a statistic for disease screening.
    BMJ. 1998 Aug 1;317(7154):307-12 PMID: 9685274
  3. Adjusting for non-compliance and contamination in randomized clinical trials.
    Stat Med. 1997 May 15;16(9):1017-29 PMID: 9160496
  4. Interim analysis: the alpha spending function approach.
    Stat Med. 1994 Jul 15-30;13(13-14):1341-52; discussion 1353-6 PMID: 7973215
  5. Monitoring the ERSPC trial.
    BJU Int. 2003 Dec;92 Suppl 2:112-4 PMID: 14983967
  6. Determining the cause of death in randomized screening trial(s) for prostate cancer.
    BJU Int. 2003 Dec;92 Suppl 2:71-8 PMID: 14983960
  7. Lead times and overdetection due to prostate-specific antigen screening: estimates from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.
    J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Jun 18;95(12):868-78 PMID: 12813170
  8. Making the most out of six systematic sextant biopsies.
    Urology. 1995 Jan;45(1):2-12 PMID: 7817477
  9. Natural history of early, localized prostate cancer.
    JAMA. 2004 Jun 9;291(22):2713-9 PMID: 15187052
  10. Complications after prostate biopsy: data from SEER-Medicare.
    J Urol. 2011 Nov;186(5):1830-4 PMID: 21944136
  11. Prostate cancer mortality reduction by screening: power and time frame with complete enrollment in the European Randomised Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) trial.
    Int J Cancer. 2002 Mar 10;98(2):268-73 PMID: 11857418
  12. A stochastic model for survival of early prostate cancer with adjustments for leadtime, length bias, and over-detection.
    Biom J. 2012 Jan;54(1):20-44 PMID: 22213054
  13. Change of tumour characteristics and treatment over time in both arms of the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.
    Eur J Cancer. 2010 Nov;46(17):3082-9 PMID: 21047590
  14. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study.
    N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1320-8 PMID: 19297566
  15. Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. I. Introduction and design.
    Br J Cancer. 1976 Dec;34(6):585-612 PMID: 795448
  16. Long-term projections of the harm-benefit trade-off in prostate cancer screening are more favorable than previous short-term estimates.
    J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1412-7 PMID: 22032753
  17. Mortality results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate-cancer screening trial.
    Lancet Oncol. 2010 Aug;11(8):725-32 PMID: 20598634
  18. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer.
    N Engl J Med. 2011 May 5;364(18):1708-17 PMID: 21542742
  19. Effective PSA contamination in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.
    Int J Cancer. 2003 Jun 20;105(3):394-9 PMID: 12704675
  20. Contamination by opportunistic screening in the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening.
    BJU Int. 2003 Dec;92 Suppl 2:97-100 PMID: 14983964
  21. What is the true number needed to screen and treat to save a life with prostate-specific antigen testing?
    J Clin Oncol. 2011 Feb 1;29(4):464-7 PMID: 21189374
Article Info
Journal
The New England journal of medicine
Abbr.
N Engl J Med
ISSN
1533-4406
Published
2012-03-15
Pages
981-90
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
0255562
PMCID
PMC6027585
Subset
IM
Grants
NCI NIH HHS · P30 CA008748 · United States
Databases
ISRCTN
ISRCTN49127736
Corrections
ErratumIn
-
CommentIn
CommentIn
CommentIn
CommentIn
CommentIn
CommentIn
CommentIn
CommentIn
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com