Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 22285593 Published · ppublish English Comparative Study Evaluation Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Comparison of ultracentrifugation, density gradient separation, and immunoaffinity capture methods for isolating human colon cancer cell line LIM1863-derived exosomes.

Methods (San Diego, Calif.) ·Vol. 56 ·No. 2 ·2012-02-00 ·Pages 293-304

Tauro BJ, Greening DW, Mathias RA, Ji H, Mathivanan S, Scott AM, Simpson RJ

Abstract

Exosomes are 40-100nm extracellular vesicles that are released from a multitude of cell types, and perform diverse cellular functions including intercellular communication, antigen presentation, and transfer of oncogenic proteins as well as mRNA and miRNA. Exosomes have been purified from biological fluids and in vitro cell cultures using a variety of strategies and techniques. However, all preparations invariably contain varying proportions of other membranous vesicles that co-purify with exosomes such as shed microvesicles and apoptotic blebs. Using the colorectal cancer cell line LIM1863 as a cell model, in this study we performed a comprehensive evaluation of current methods used for exosome isolation including ultracentrifugation (UC-Exos), OptiPrep™ density-based separation (DG-Exos), and immunoaffinity capture using anti-EpCAM coated magnetic beads (IAC-Exos). Notably, all isolations contained 40-100nm vesicles, and were positive for exosome markers (Alix, TSG101, HSP70) based on electron microscopy and Western blotting. We employed a proteomic approach to profile the protein composition of exosomes, and label-free spectral counting to evaluate the effectiveness of each method. Based on the number of MS/MS spectra identified for exosome markers and proteins associated with their biogenesis, trafficking, and release, we found IAC-Exos to be the most effective method to isolate exosomes. For example, Alix, TSG101, CD9 and CD81 were significantly higher (at least 2-fold) in IAC-Exos, compared to UG-Exos and DG-Exos. Application of immunoaffinity capture has enabled the identification of proteins including the ESCRT-III component VPS32C/CHMP4C, and the SNARE synaptobrevin 2 (VAMP2) in exosomes for the first time. Additionally, several cancer-related proteins were identified in IAC-Exos including various ephrins (EFNB1, EFNB2) and Eph receptors (EPHA2-8, EPHB1-4), and components involved in Wnt (CTNNB1, TNIK) and Ras (CRK, GRB2) signalling.

MeSH Terms
Biomarkers/chemistry Blotting, Western Cell Line, Tumor Centrifugation, Density Gradient/methods Culture Media/chemistry Databases, Protein Endosomal Sorting Complexes Required for Transport/chemistry Exosomes/chemistry,ultrastructure Humans Immunoassay/methods Microscopy, Electron Protein Transport Proteome/analysis,chemistry Proteomics/methods Ultracentrifugation/methods
Chemicals
Biomarkers CHMP4C protein, human Culture Media Endosomal Sorting Complexes Required for Transport Proteome
Authors & Affiliations
7 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Tauro Bow J
Department of Biochemistry, La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
Greening David W
Mathias Rommel A
Ji Hong
Mathivanan Suresh
Scott Andrew M
Simpson Richard J
Article Info
Journal
Methods (San Diego, Calif.)
Abbr.
Methods
ISSN
1095-9130
Published
2012-02-00
Epub
2012-00-21
Pages
293-304
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
9426302
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com