Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 22052992 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Direct maximization of protein identifications from tandem mass spectra.

Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP ·Vol. 11 ·No. 2 ·2012-02-00 ·Pages M111.012161

Spivak M, Weston J, Tomazela D, MacCoss MJ, Noble WS

Abstract

The goal of many shotgun proteomics experiments is to determine the protein complement of a complex biological mixture. For many mixtures, most methodological approaches fall significantly short of this goal. Existing solutions to this problem typically subdivide the task into two stages: first identifying a collection of peptides with a low false discovery rate and then inferring from the peptides a corresponding set of proteins. In contrast, we formulate the protein identification problem as a single optimization problem, which we solve using machine learning methods. This approach is motivated by the observation that the peptide and protein level tasks are cooperative, and the solution to each can be improved by using information about the solution to the other. The resulting algorithm directly controls the relevant error rate, can incorporate a wide variety of evidence and, for complex samples, provides 18-34% more protein identifications than the current state of the art approaches.

MeSH Terms
Algorithms Amniotic Fluid/chemistry,metabolism Artificial Intelligence Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins/metabolism Complex Mixtures/analysis Databases, Protein Humans Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Models, Statistical Peptide Fragments/analysis Proteins/analysis Proteomics Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/metabolism Software Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods
Chemicals
Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins Complex Mixtures Peptide Fragments Proteins Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins
Authors & Affiliations
5 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Spivak Marina
Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Weston Jason
Tomazela Daniela
MacCoss Michael J
Noble William Stafford
References (28)
28 references, click to expand
  1. Statistical validation of peptide identifications in large-scale proteomics using the target-decoy database search strategy and flexible mixture modeling.
    J Proteome Res. 2008 Jan;7(1):286-92 PMID: 18078310
  2. Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry.
    Nat Methods. 2007 Mar;4(3):207-14 PMID: 17327847
  3. A method for assessing the statistical significance of mass spectrometry-based protein identifications using general scoring schemes.
    Anal Chem. 2003 Feb 15;75(4):768-74 PMID: 12622365
  4. False discovery rates and related statistical concepts in mass spectrometry-based proteomics.
    J Proteome Res. 2008 Jan;7(1):47-50 PMID: 18067251
  5. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data.
    Electrophoresis. 1999 Dec;20(18):3551-67 PMID: 10612281
  6. Semi-supervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets.
    Nat Methods. 2007 Nov;4(11):923-5 PMID: 17952086
  7. Prediction of error associated with false-positive rate determination for peptide identification in large-scale proteomics experiments using a combined reverse and forward peptide sequence database strategy.
    J Proteome Res. 2007 Jan;6(1):392-8 PMID: 17203984
  8. Improvements to the percolator algorithm for Peptide identification from shotgun proteomics data sets.
    J Proteome Res. 2009 Jul;8(7):3737-45 PMID: 19385687
  9. Modes of inference for evaluating the confidence of peptide identifications.
    J Proteome Res. 2008 Jan;7(1):35-9 PMID: 18067248
  10. Dissecting the regulatory circuitry of a eukaryotic genome.
    Cell. 1998 Nov 25;95(5):717-28 PMID: 9845373
  11. Protein identification false discovery rates for very large proteomics data sets generated by tandem mass spectrometry.
    Mol Cell Proteomics. 2009 Nov;8(11):2405-17 PMID: 19608599
  12. Rapid and accurate peptide identification from tandem mass spectra.
    J Proteome Res. 2008 Jul;7(7):3022-7 PMID: 18505281
  13. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry.
    Anal Chem. 2003 Sep 1;75(17):4646-58 PMID: 14632076
  14. Semisupervised model-based validation of peptide identifications in mass spectrometry-based proteomics.
    J Proteome Res. 2008 Jan;7(1):254-65 PMID: 18159924
  15. Open mass spectrometry search algorithm.
    J Proteome Res. 2004 Sep-Oct;3(5):958-64 PMID: 15473683
  16. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search.
    Anal Chem. 2002 Oct 15;74(20):5383-92 PMID: 12403597
  17. IDPicker 2.0: Improved protein assembly with high discrimination peptide identification filtering.
    J Proteome Res. 2009 Aug;8(8):3872-81 PMID: 19522537
  18. Global analysis of protein expression in yeast.
    Nature. 2003 Oct 16;425(6959):737-41 PMID: 14562106
  19. Qscore: an algorithm for evaluating SEQUEST database search results.
    J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2002 Apr;13(4):378-86 PMID: 11951976
  20. Data management and preliminary data analysis in the pilot phase of the HUPO Plasma Proteome Project.
    Proteomics. 2005 Aug;5(13):3246-61 PMID: 16104057
  21. Assigning significance to peptides identified by tandem mass spectrometry using decoy databases.
    J Proteome Res. 2008 Jan;7(1):29-34 PMID: 18067246
  22. Machines that learn to segment images: a crucial technology for connectomics.
    Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010 Oct;20(5):653-66 PMID: 20801638
  23. Evaluation of multidimensional chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/LC-MS/MS) for large-scale protein analysis: the yeast proteome.
    J Proteome Res. 2003 Jan-Feb;2(1):43-50 PMID: 12643542
  24. Intensity-based protein identification by machine learning from a library of tandem mass spectra.
    Nat Biotechnol. 2004 Feb;22(2):214-9 PMID: 14730315
  25. A new algorithm for the evaluation of shotgun peptide sequencing in proteomics: support vector machine classification of peptide MS/MS spectra and SEQUEST scores.
    J Proteome Res. 2003 Mar-Apr;2(2):137-46 PMID: 12716127
  26. Proteomic parsimony through bipartite graph analysis improves accuracy and transparency.
    J Proteome Res. 2007 Sep;6(9):3549-57 PMID: 17676885
  27. Advancement in protein inference from shotgun proteomics using peptide detectability.
    Pac Symp Biocomput. 2007;:409-20 PMID: 17990506
  28. False discovery rates of protein identifications: a strike against the two-peptide rule.
    J Proteome Res. 2009 Sep;8(9):4173-81 PMID: 19627159
Article Info
Journal
Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP
Abbr.
Mol Cell Proteomics
ISSN
1535-9484
Published
2012-02-00
Epub
2011-00-03
Pages
M111.012161
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
101125647
PMCID
PMC3277760
Subset
IM
Grants
NCRR NIH HHS · P41 RR011823 · United States
NIBIB NIH HHS · R01 EB007057 · United States
NHLBI NIH HHS · R01 HL082747 · United States
NCRR NIH HHS · P41 RR0011823 · United States
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com