Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 21639808 Published · ppublish English Clinical Trial, Phase III Comparative Study Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation.

The New England journal of medicine ·Vol. 364 ·No. 26 ·2011-06-30 ·Pages 2507-16

Chapman PB, Hauschild A, Robert C, Haanen JB, Ascierto P, Larkin J, Dummer R, Garbe C, Testori A, Maio M, Hogg D, Lorigan P, Lebbe C, Jouary T, Schadendorf D, Ribas A, O'Day SJ, Sosman JA, Kirkwood JM, Eggermont AM, Dreno B, Nolop K, Li J, Nelson B, Hou J, Lee RJ, Flaherty KT, McArthur GA, BRIM-3 Study Group

Abstract

Phase 1 and 2 clinical trials of the BRAF kinase inhibitor vemurafenib (PLX4032) have shown response rates of more than 50% in patients with metastatic melanoma with the BRAF V600E mutation. We conducted a phase 3 randomized clinical trial comparing vemurafenib with dacarbazine in 675 patients with previously untreated, metastatic melanoma with the BRAF V600E mutation. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either vemurafenib (960 mg orally twice daily) or dacarbazine (1000 mg per square meter of body-surface area intravenously every 3 weeks). Coprimary end points were rates of overall and progression-free survival. Secondary end points included the response rate, response duration, and safety. A final analysis was planned after 196 deaths and an interim analysis after 98 deaths. At 6 months, overall survival was 84% (95% confidence interval [CI], 78 to 89) in the vemurafenib group and 64% (95% CI, 56 to 73) in the dacarbazine group. In the interim analysis for overall survival and final analysis for progression-free survival, vemurafenib was associated with a relative reduction of 63% in the risk of death and of 74% in the risk of either death or disease progression, as compared with dacarbazine (P<0.001 for both comparisons). After review of the interim analysis by an independent data and safety monitoring board, crossover from dacarbazine to vemurafenib was recommended. Response rates were 48% for vemurafenib and 5% for dacarbazine. Common adverse events associated with vemurafenib were arthralgia, rash, fatigue, alopecia, keratoacanthoma or squamous-cell carcinoma, photosensitivity, nausea, and diarrhea; 38% of patients required dose modification because of toxic effects. Vemurafenib produced improved rates of overall and progression-free survival in patients with previously untreated melanoma with the BRAF V600E mutation. (Funded by Hoffmann-La Roche; BRIM-3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01006980.).

MeSH Terms
Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects,therapeutic use Dacarbazine/adverse effects,therapeutic use Disease-Free Survival Female Humans Indoles/adverse effects,therapeutic use Intention to Treat Analysis Male Melanoma/drug therapy,genetics,mortality Middle Aged Mutation Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/antagonists & inhibitors,genetics Sulfonamides/adverse effects,therapeutic use Survival Analysis Vemurafenib Young Adult
Chemicals
Antineoplastic Agents Indoles Sulfonamides Vemurafenib Dacarbazine BRAF protein, human Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf
Authors & Affiliations
29 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Chapman Paul B
Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA. chapmanp@mskcc.org
Hauschild Axel
Robert Caroline
Haanen John B
Ascierto Paolo
Larkin James
Dummer Reinhard
Garbe Claus
Testori Alessandro
Maio Michele
Hogg David
Lorigan Paul
Lebbe Celeste
Jouary Thomas
Schadendorf Dirk
Ribas Antoni
O'Day Steven J
Sosman Jeffrey A
Kirkwood John M
Eggermont Alexander M M
Dreno Brigitte
Nolop Keith
Li Jiang
Nelson Betty
Hou Jeannie
Lee Richard J
Flaherty Keith T
McArthur Grant A
BRIM-3 Study Group
Investigators
102 investigators, click to expand
Boyle F
Brady B
Eastgate M
Guminski A
Kefford R
Millward M
Parente P
Wu M
Atkinson V
Hersey P
Couture F
McWhirter E
Miller W
Petrella T
Smylie M
Wong R
Cupissol D
Grob J-J
Joly P
Mortier L
Ortonne J-P
Thomas L
Berking C
Enk A
Gesierich A
Gutzmer R
Hafner C
Herbst R
Kaufmann R
Loquai C
Mauch C
Mohr P
Sell S
Simon J
Stadler R
Stein A
Lotem M
Ron I
Schachter J
Cognetti F
Del Vecchio M
Guida M
Queirolo P
Siena S
Hospers G
van den Eertwegh A
Barrow C
Isaacs R
Jackson C
Jameson M
McCrystal M
Hansson J
Lundgren L
Ljuslinder I
Wagenius G
Walz T
Michelien O
Brown E
Chao D
Corrie P
Evans J
Harries M
Middleton M
Nathan P
Ottensmeier C
Patel P
Plummer R
Wagstaff J
Wolstenholme V
Akerley W
Collichio F
Conry R
Cranmer L
Curti B
Flaherty L
Hainsworth J
Lawson D
Linette G
Logan T
Margolin K
Pavlick A
Spitler L
Gonzalez R
Hutson T
Moschos S
Schuchter L
Helms Beth
Bossierre Frederic
Cheng Susan
Deo Vidya
Harrison Shurree
Joe Andrew
Kohler Astrid
Kucera Vera
Lawrence Jeffrey
Muehlig Axel
Nanni Sandrine
Parmi Jeana
Rothe Mark
Tchernakov Kirill
Trunzer Kerstin
Bollag Gideon
References (25)
25 references, click to expand
  1. Inhibition of mutated, activated BRAF in metastatic melanoma.
    N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 26;363(9):809-19 PMID: 20818844
  2. Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma.
    N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 19;363(8):711-23 PMID: 20525992
  3. The RAF inhibitor PLX4032 inhibits ERK signaling and tumor cell proliferation in a V600E BRAF-selective manner.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Aug 17;107(33):14903-8 PMID: 20668238
  4. Melanomas acquire resistance to B-RAF(V600E) inhibition by RTK or N-RAS upregulation.
    Nature. 2010 Dec 16;468(7326):973-7 PMID: 21107323
  5. Survival plots of time-to-event outcomes in clinical trials: good practice and pitfalls.
    Lancet. 2002 May 11;359(9318):1686-9 PMID: 12020548
  6. BRAF mutations in metastatic melanoma: a possible association with clinical outcome.
    Clin Cancer Res. 2003 Aug 15;9(9):3362-8 PMID: 12960123
  7. Cancer statistics, 2010.
    CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Sep-Oct;60(5):277-300 PMID: 20610543
  8. Clinical efficacy of a RAF inhibitor needs broad target blockade in BRAF-mutant melanoma.
    Nature. 2010 Sep 30;467(7315):596-9 PMID: 20823850
  9. Phase III multicenter randomized trial of the Dartmouth regimen versus dacarbazine in patients with metastatic melanoma.
    J Clin Oncol. 1999 Sep;17(9):2745-51 PMID: 10561349
  10. Distinct sets of genetic alterations in melanoma.
    N Engl J Med. 2005 Nov 17;353(20):2135-47 PMID: 16291983
  11. Acquired resistance to BRAF inhibitors mediated by a RAF kinase switch in melanoma can be overcome by cotargeting MEK and IGF-1R/PI3K.
    Cancer Cell. 2010 Dec 14;18(6):683-95 PMID: 21156289
  12. Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification.
    J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 20;27(36):6199-206 PMID: 19917835
  13. Oncogenic BRAF induces melanoma cell invasion by downregulating the cGMP-specific phosphodiesterase PDE5A.
    Cancer Cell. 2011 Jan 18;19(1):45-57 PMID: 21215707
  14. Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer.
    Nature. 2002 Jun 27;417(6892):949-54 PMID: 12068308
  15. Prognostic and clinicopathologic associations of oncogenic BRAF in metastatic melanoma.
    J Clin Oncol. 2011 Apr 1;29(10):1239-46 PMID: 21343559
  16. Randomized phase III study of temozolomide versus dacarbazine in the treatment of patients with advanced metastatic malignant melanoma.
    J Clin Oncol. 2000 Jan;18(1):158-66 PMID: 10623706
  17. Bcl-2 antisense (oblimersen sodium) plus dacarbazine in patients with advanced melanoma: the Oblimersen Melanoma Study Group.
    J Clin Oncol. 2006 Oct 10;24(29):4738-45 PMID: 16966688
  18. Sorafenib-induced premalignant and malignant skin lesions.
    Int J Dermatol. 2011 Apr;50(4):396-402 PMID: 21413947
  19. RAF inhibitors transactivate RAF dimers and ERK signalling in cells with wild-type BRAF.
    Nature. 2010 Mar 18;464(7287):427-30 PMID: 20179705
  20. COT drives resistance to RAF inhibition through MAP kinase pathway reactivation.
    Nature. 2010 Dec 16;468(7326):968-72 PMID: 21107320
  21. Kinase-dead BRAF and oncogenic RAS cooperate to drive tumor progression through CRAF.
    Cell. 2010 Jan 22;140(2):209-21 PMID: 20141835
  22. The histologic spectrum of epithelial neoplasms induced by sorafenib.
    J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009 Sep;61(3):522-7 PMID: 19700018
  23. Discovery of a selective inhibitor of oncogenic B-Raf kinase with potent antimelanoma activity.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Feb 26;105(8):3041-6 PMID: 18287029
  24. Fotemustine compared with dacarbazine in patients with disseminated malignant melanoma: a phase III study.
    J Clin Oncol. 2004 Mar 15;22(6):1118-25 PMID: 15020614
  25. RAF inhibitors prime wild-type RAF to activate the MAPK pathway and enhance growth.
    Nature. 2010 Mar 18;464(7287):431-5 PMID: 20130576
Article Info
Journal
The New England journal of medicine
Abbr.
N Engl J Med
ISSN
1533-4406
Published
2011-06-30
Epub
2011-00-05
Pages
2507-16
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
0255562
PMCID
PMC3549296
Subset
IM
Grants
NCI NIH HHS · K24 CA097588 · United States
NCATS NIH HHS · UL1 TR000005 · United States
Databases
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT01006980
Corrections
CommentIn
CommentIn
CommentIn
CommentIn
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com