Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 19937390 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

In vivo bioluminescence imaging of murine xenograft cancer models with a red-shifted thermostable luciferase.

Molecular imaging and biology ·Vol. 12 ·No. 4 ·2010-08-00 ·Pages 406-14

Mezzanotte L, Fazzina R, Michelini E, Tonelli R, Pession A, Branchini B, Roda A

Abstract

Conventional in vivo bioluminescence imaging using wild-type green-emitting luciferase is limited by absorption and scattering of the bioluminescent signal through tissues. Imaging methods using a red-shifted thermostable luciferase from Photinus pyralis were optimized to improve the sensitivity and image resolution. In vivo bioluminescence imaging performance of red- and green-emitting luciferases were compared in two different xenograft mouse models for cancer. Human hepatoblastoma cell line (HepG2) and human acute monocytic leukemia cell line (Thp1) cells were genetically engineered using retroviral vector technology to stably express the red-shifted or the wild-type green luciferase. A xenograft model of liver cancer was established by subcutaneous injection of the HepG2-engineered cells in the flank regions of mice, and a leukemia model was generated by intravenous injection of the engineered Thp1 cells. The cancer progression was monitored with an ultrasensitive charge-coupled device camera. The relative intensities of the green- and red-emitting luciferases were measured, and the resulting spatial resolutions of the images were compared. Imaging was performed with both intact and scarified live animals to quantify the absorption effects of the skin and deep tissue. The red-emitting luciferase was found to emit a bioluminescence signal with improved transmission properties compared to the green-emitting luciferase. By imaging the HepG2 models, which contained tumors just beneath the skin, before and after scarification, the percentage of light absorbed by the skin was calculated. The green bioluminescent signal was 75 +/- 8% absorbed by the skin, whereas the red signal was only 20 +/- 6% absorbed. The Thp1 model, which contains cancer cells within the bones, was likewise imaged before and after scarification to calculate the percentage of light absorbed by all tissue under the skin. This tissue was responsible for 90 +/- 5% absorption of the green signal, but only 65 +/- 6% absorption of the red signal. Two different bioluminescent mouse cancer models demonstrate the utility of a new red-shifted thermostable luciferase, Ppy RE-TS, that improved the in vivo imaging performance when compared with wild-type P. Pyralis luciferase. While wild-type luciferase is currently a popular reporter for in vivo imaging methods, this study demonstrates the potential of red-emitting firefly luciferase mutants to enhance the performance of bioluminescence imaging experiments.

MeSH Terms
Absorption/drug effects Animals Benzothiazoles/administration & dosage,pharmacology Cell Count Cell Line, Tumor Color Disease Progression Enzyme Stability/drug effects Hep G2 Cells Humans Injections, Intraperitoneal Kinetics Luciferases Luminescent Measurements/methods Mice Molecular Imaging/methods Photons Substrate Specificity/drug effects Temperature Transfection Tumor Burden/drug effects Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays
Chemicals
Benzothiazoles D-luciferin Luciferases
Authors & Affiliations
7 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Mezzanotte Laura
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Bologna, Via Belmeloro 6, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Fazzina Raffaella
Michelini Elisa
Tonelli Roberto
Pession Andrea
Branchini Bruce
Roda Aldo
References (20)
20 references, click to expand
  1. Validating bioluminescence imaging as a high-throughput, quantitative modality for assessing tumor burden.
    Mol Imaging. 2004 Apr;3(2):117-24 PMID: 15296676
  2. Codon-optimized Gaussia luciferase cDNA for mammalian gene expression in culture and in vivo.
    Mol Ther. 2005 Mar;11(3):435-43 PMID: 15727940
  3. Hyperspectral and multispectral bioluminescence optical tomography for small animal imaging.
    Phys Med Biol. 2005 Dec 7;50(23):5421-41 PMID: 16306643
  4. Red-shifted Renilla reniformis luciferase variants for imaging in living subjects.
    Nat Methods. 2007 Aug;4(8):641-3 PMID: 17618292
  5. Two-dimensional bioluminescence tomography: numerical simulations and phantom experiments.
    Appl Opt. 2006 May 10;45(14):3390-4 PMID: 16676048
  6. Thermostable red and green light-producing firefly luciferase mutants for bioluminescent reporter applications.
    Anal Biochem. 2007 Feb 15;361(2):253-62 PMID: 17181991
  7. Quantitative bioluminescence imaging of transgene expression in vivo.
    Anal Biochem. 2006 Aug 1;355(1):90-4 PMID: 16737677
  8. Dynamic bioluminescence imaging for quantitative tumour burden assessment using IV or IP administration of D: -luciferin: effect on intensity, time kinetics and repeatability of photon emission.
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008 May;35(5):999-1007 PMID: 18180921
  9. A redshifted codon-optimized firefly luciferase is a sensitive reporter for bioluminescence imaging.
    Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2009 Jan;8(1):52-6 PMID: 19247529
  10. Quantitative comparison of click beetle and firefly luciferases for in vivo bioluminescence imaging.
    J Biomed Opt. 2007 Sep-Oct;12(5):054018 PMID: 17994906
  11. Advances in optical imaging and novel model systems for cancer metastasis research.
    Clin Exp Metastasis. 2007;24(8):699-705 PMID: 17972147
  12. Uptake kinetics and biodistribution of 14C-D-luciferin--a radiolabeled substrate for the firefly luciferase catalyzed bioluminescence reaction: impact on bioluminescence based reporter gene imaging.
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008 Dec;35(12):2275-85 PMID: 18661130
  13. Looking and listening to light: the evolution of whole-body photonic imaging.
    Nat Biotechnol. 2005 Mar;23(3):313-20 PMID: 15765087
  14. Advances in imaging mouse tumour models in vivo.
    J Pathol. 2005 Jan;205(2):194-205 PMID: 15641018
  15. Advances in in vivo bioluminescence imaging of gene expression.
    Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2002;4:235-60 PMID: 12117758
  16. A novel bioluminescent mouse model and effective therapy for adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma.
    Cancer Res. 2007 Dec 15;67(24):11859-66 PMID: 18089816
  17. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 spinoculation enhances infection through virus binding.
    J Virol. 2000 Nov;74(21):10074-80 PMID: 11024136
  18. G1 cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis by histone deacetylase inhibition in MLL-AF9 acute myeloid leukemia cells is p21 dependent and MLL-AF9 independent.
    Leukemia. 2006 Jul;20(7):1307-10 PMID: 16617320
  19. Emission spectra of bioluminescent reporters and interaction with mammalian tissue determine the sensitivity of detection in vivo.
    J Biomed Opt. 2005 Jul-Aug;10(4):41210 PMID: 16178634
  20. Advances in bioluminescence imaging of live animal models.
    Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2009 Feb;20(1):45-53 PMID: 19233638
Article Info
Journal
Molecular imaging and biology
Abbr.
Mol Imaging Biol
ISSN
1860-2002
Published
2010-08-00
Epub
2009-00-25
Pages
406-14
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
101125610
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com