Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 19920198 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Intrinsic gene expression profiles of gliomas are a better predictor of survival than histology.

Cancer research ·Vol. 69 ·No. 23 ·2009-12-01 ·Pages 9065-72

Gravendeel LA, Kouwenhoven MC, Gevaert O, de Rooi JJ, Stubbs AP, Duijm JE, Daemen A, Bleeker FE, Bralten LB, Kloosterhof NK, De Moor B, Eilers PH, van der Spek PJ, Kros JM, Sillevis Smitt PA, van den Bent MJ, French PJ

Abstract

Gliomas are the most common primary brain tumors with heterogeneous morphology and variable prognosis. Treatment decisions in patients rely mainly on histologic classification and clinical parameters. However, differences between histologic subclasses and grades are subtle, and classifying gliomas is subject to a large interobserver variability. To improve current classification standards, we have performed gene expression profiling on a large cohort of glioma samples of all histologic subtypes and grades. We identified seven distinct molecular subgroups that correlate with survival. These include two favorable prognostic subgroups (median survival, >4.7 years), two with intermediate prognosis (median survival, 1-4 years), two with poor prognosis (median survival, <1 year), and one control group. The intrinsic molecular subtypes of glioma are different from histologic subgroups and correlate better to patient survival. The prognostic value of molecular subgroups was validated on five independent sample cohorts (The Cancer Genome Atlas, Repository for Molecular Brain Neoplasia Data, GSE12907, GSE4271, and Li and colleagues). The power of intrinsic subtyping is shown by its ability to identify a subset of prognostically favorable tumors within an external data set that contains only histologically confirmed glioblastomas (GBM). Specific genetic changes (epidermal growth factor receptor amplification, IDH1 mutation, and 1p/19q loss of heterozygosity) segregate in distinct molecular subgroups. We identified a subgroup with molecular features associated with secondary GBM, suggesting that different genetic changes drive gene expression profiles. Finally, we assessed response to treatment in molecular subgroups. Our data provide compelling evidence that expression profiling is a more accurate and objective method to classify gliomas than histologic classification. Molecular classification therefore may aid diagnosis and can guide clinical decision making.

MeSH Terms
Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Brain Neoplasms/genetics,pathology Child Cluster Analysis Female Gene Expression Profiling Glioma/genetics,pathology Humans Male Middle Aged Prognosis Reproducibility of Results Survival Rate Young Adult
Authors & Affiliations
17 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Gravendeel Lonneke A M
Department of Neurology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Kouwenhoven Mathilde C M
Gevaert Olivier
de Rooi Johan J
Stubbs Andrew P
Duijm J Elza
Daemen Anneleen
Bleeker Fonnet E
Bralten Linda B C
Kloosterhof Nanne K
De Moor Bart
Eilers Paul H C
van der Spek Peter J
Kros Johan M
Sillevis Smitt Peter A E
van den Bent Martin J
French Pim J
Article Info
Journal
Cancer research
Abbr.
Cancer Res
ISSN
1538-7445
Published
2009-12-01
Epub
2009-00-17
Pages
9065-72
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
2984705R
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com