Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 19538550 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Adaptation and colonization history affect the evolution of clines in two introduced species.

The New phytologist ·Vol. 183 ·No. 3 ·2009-08-00 ·Pages 678-690

Keller SR, Sowell DR, Neiman M, Wolfe LM, Taylor DR

Abstract

Phenotypic and genetic clines have long been synonymous with adaptive evolution. However, other processes (for example, migration, range expansion, invasion) may generate clines in traits or loci across geographical and environmental gradients. It is therefore important to distinguish between clines that represent adaptive evolution and those that result from selectively neutral demographic or genetic processes. We tested for the differentiation of phenotypic traits along environmental gradients using two species in the genus Silene, whilst statistically controlling for colonization history and founder effects. We sampled seed families from across the native and introduced ranges, genotyped individuals and estimated phenotypic differentiation in replicated common gardens. The results suggest that post-glacial expansion of S. vulgaris and S. latifolia involved both neutral and adaptive genetic differentiation (clines) of life history traits along major axes of environmental variation in Europe and North America. Phenotypic clines generally persisted when tested against the neutral expectation, although some clines disappeared (and one cline emerged) when the effects of genetic ancestry were statistically removed. Colonization history, estimated using genetic markers, is a useful null model for tests of adaptive trait divergence, especially during range expansion and invasion when selection and gene flow may not have reached equilibrium.

MeSH Terms
Adaptation, Physiological/genetics Biological Evolution Climate Geography Phenotype Phylogeny Silene/genetics,physiology Species Specificity
Authors & Affiliations
5 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Keller Stephen R
Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4328, USA.
Sowell Dexter R
Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4328, USA.
Neiman Maurine
Department of Biology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242; USA.
Wolfe Lorne M
Department of Biology, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA 30460, USA.
Taylor Douglas R
Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4328, USA.
References (64)
64 references, click to expand
  1. Amsellem L, Noyer JL, Le Bourgeois T, Hossaert-McKey M. 2000. Comparison of genetic diversity of the invasive weed Rubus alceifolius Poir. (Rosaceae) in its native range and in areas of introduction, using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers. Molecular Ecology 9: 443-455.
  2. Antonovics J, Bradshaw AD. 1970. Evolution in closely adjacent plant populations VIII. Clinal patterns at a mine boundary. Heredity 25: 349-362.
  3. Baker HG. 1948. Stages in invasion and replacement demonstrated by species of Melandrium. Journal of Ecology 36: 96-119.
  4. Blackburn T, Gaston KJ, Loder N. 1999. Geographic gradients in body size: a clarification of Bergmann's Rule. Diversity and Distributions 5: 165-174.
  5. Blair AC, Wolfe LM. 2004. The evolution of an invasive plant: an experimental study with Silene latifolia. Ecology 85: 3035-3042.
  6. Bossdorf O, Auge H, Lafuma L, Rogers WE, Siemann E, Prati D. 2005. Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations. Oecologia 144: 1-11.
  7. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Menozzi P, Piazza A. 1993. Demic expansions and human evolution. Science 259: 639-646.
  8. Chang K-T. 2008. Introduction to geographic information systems. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
  9. Clausen J, Keck DD, Hiesey WM. 1948. Experimental studies on the nature of species III.In: Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication 581. Washington DC, USA: Carnegie Institute of Washington.
  10. Clegg SM, Degnan SM, Kikkawa J, Moritz C, Estoup A, Owens IPF. 2002. Genetic consequences of sequential founder events by an island-colonizing bird. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 99: 8127-8132.
  11. Delph LF, Knapczyk FN, Taylor DR. 2002. Among-population variation and correlations in sexually dimorphic traits of Silene latifolia. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15: 1011-1020.
  12. Dlugosch KM, Parker IM. 2008. Founding events in species invasions: genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions. Molecular Ecology 17: 431-449.
  13. Drezner TD. 2003. Revisiting Bergmann's rule for saguaros (Carnegiea gigantea (Engelm.) Britt. and Rose): stem diameter patterns over space. Journal of Biogeography 30: 353-359.
  14. Eanes WF. 1999. Analysis of selection on enzyme polymorphisms. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30: 301-326.
  15. Endler J. 1977. Geographic variation, speciation, and clines. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
  16. Etterson JR, Delf DE, Craig TP, Ando Y, Ohgushi T. 2008. Parallel patterns of clinal variation in Solidago altissima in its native range in central USA and its invasive range in Japan. Botany-Botanique 86: 91-97.
  17. Facon B, Pointier J-P, Jarne P, Sarda V, David P. 2008. High genetic variance in life-history strategies within invasive populations by way of multiple introductions. Current Biology 18: 363-367.
  18. Glaettli M, Pescatore L, Goudet J. 2006. Proximity-dependent pollen performance in Silene vulgaris. Annals of Botany 98: 431-437.
  19. Gould SJ, Lewontin RC. 1979. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 205: 581-598.
  20. Hewitt G. 2000. The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages. Nature 405: 907-913.
  21. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Journal of Climatology 25: 1965-1978.
  22. Huey RB, Gilchrist GW, Carlson ML, Berrigan D, Serra L. 2000. Rapid evolution of a geographic cline in size in an introduced fly. Science 287: 308-309.
  23. Ingvarsson P, Garcia MV, Hall D, Luquez V, Jansson S. 2006. Clinal variation in phyB2, a candidate gene for daylength-induced growth cessation and bud set, across a latitudinal gradient in European Aspen (Populus tremula). Genetics 172: 1845-1853.
  24. Johnson JB, Omland KS. 2004. Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19: 101-108.
  25. Johnston RF, Selander RK. 1964. House sparrows: rapid evolution of races in North America. Science 144: 548-550.
  26. Jolivet C, Bernasconi G. 2007. Molecular and quantitative genetic differentiation in European populations of Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae). Annals of Botany 100: 119-127.
  27. Keller SR. 2008. History, chance, and adaptation: the evolution of Silene vulgaris in its native and introduced ranges. PhD Thesis. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA.
  28. Keller SR, Taylor DR. 2008. History, chance and adaptation during biological invasion: separating stochastic phenotypic evolution from response to selection. Ecology Letters 11: 852-866.
  29. Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16: 111-120.
  30. Kollmann J, Banuelos MJ. 2004. Latitudinal trends in growth and phenology of the invasive alien plant Impatiens glandulifera (Balsaminaceae). Diversity and Distributions 10: 377-385.
  31. Lacey EP. 1988. Latitudinal variation in reproductive timing of a short-lived monocarp, Daucus carota (Apiaceae). Ecology 69: 220-232.
  32. Lavergne S, Molofsky J. 2007. Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 104: 3883-3888.
  33. Leger EA, Rice KJ. 2007. Assessing the speed and predictability of local adaptation in invasive California poppies (Eschscholzia californica). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 1090-1103.
  34. Lewontin RC, Krakauer J. 1973. Distribution of gene frequency as a test of theory of selective neutrality of polymorphisms. Genetics 74: 175-195.
  35. Maron JL, Elmendorf SC, Vila M. 2007. Contrasting plant physiological adaptation to climate in the native and introduced range of Hypericum perforatum. Evolution 61: 1912-1924.
  36. Maron JL, Vila M, Bommarco R, Elmendorf S, Beardsley P. 2004. Rapid evolution of an invasive plant. Ecological Monographs 74: 261-280.
  37. Martindale IC. 1876. The introduction of foreign plants. Botanical Gazette 2: 55-58.
  38. Mastenbroek O, Prentice HC, Heringa J, Hogeweg P. 1983. Corresponding patterns of geographic variation among populations of Silene latifolia (= S. alba= S. pratensis) (Caryophyllaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 145: 227-242.
  39. McCauley DE, Raveill J, Antonovics J. 1995. Local founding events as determinants of genetic structure in a plan metapopulation. Heredity 75: 630-636.
  40. McNeill J. 1977. The biology of Canadian weeds. 25. Silene alba (Miller) E.H.L. Krause. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 57: 1103-1114.
  41. Menzel A, Sparks TH, Estrella N, Eckhardt S. 2005. ‘SSW to NNE’- North Atlantic Oscillation affects the progress of seasons across Europe. Global Change Biology 11: 909-918.
  42. Montague JL, Barrett SCH, Eckert CG. 2008. Re-establishment of clinal variation in flowering time among introduced populations of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria, Lythraceae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21: 234-245.
  43. Novak SJ, Mack RN. 2005. Genetic bottlenecks in alien plant species: influence of mating systems and introduction dynamics. In: Sax DF, Stachowicz JJ, Gaines SD, eds. Species invasions: insights into ecology, evolution, and biogeography. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates, Inc., 201-228.
  44. Petit RJ, Aguinagalde I, De Beaulieu J-L, Bittkau C, Brewer S, Cheddadi R, Ennos R, Fineschi S, Grivet D, Lascoux M et al . 2003. Glacial refugia: hotspots but not melting pots of genetic diversity. Science 300: 1563-1565.
  45. Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, Weinblatt ME, Shadick NA, Reich D. 2006. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nature Genetics 38: 904-909.
  46. Randall RP. 2002. A global compendium of weeds. Melbourne, Australia: R.G. and F.J. Richardson.
  47. Roach DA, Wulff RD. 1987. Maternal effects in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 209-235.
  48. Roman J. 2006. Diluting the founder effect: cryptic invasions expand a marine invader's range. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 273: 2453-2459.
  49. Roman J, Darling JA. 2007. Paradox lost: genetic diversity and the success of aquatic invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22: 454-464.
  50. Samis KE, Heath KD, Stinchcombe JR. 2008. Discordant longitudinal clines in flowering time and phytochrome C in Arabidopsis thaliana. Evolution 62: 2971-2983.
  51. SAS. 2004. SAS 9.1.3. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute .
  52. Savolainen O, Pyhajarvi T, Knurr T. 2007. Gene flow and local adaptation in trees. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 38: 595-619.
  53. Scholander PF. 1955. Evolution of climatic adaptation in homeotherms. Evolution 9: 15-26.
  54. Spitze K. 1993. Population-structure in Daphnia obtusa - quantitative genetic and allozyme variation. Genetics 135: 367-374.
  55. Stearns SC. 1989. Trade-offs in life-history evolution. Functional Ecology 3: 259-268.
  56. Stinchcombe JR, Weinig C, Ungerer M, Olsen KM, Mays C, Halldorsdottir SS, Purugganan MD, Schmitt J. 2004. A latitudinal cline in flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana modulated by the flowering time gene FRIGIDA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101: 4712-4717.
  57. Taylor DR, Keller SR. 2007. Historical range expansion determines the phylogenetic diversity introduced during contemporary species invasion. Evolution 61: 334-345.
  58. Vasemagi A. 2006. The adaptive hypothesis of clinal variation revisited: single-locus clines as a result of spatially restricted gene flow. Genetics 173: 2411-2414.
  59. Wares JP, Hughes AR, Grosberg RK. 2005. Mechanisms that drive evolutionary change: insights from species introductions and invasions. In: Sax DF, Stachowicz JJ, Gaines SD, eds. Species invasions: insights into ecology, evolution, and biogeography. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates, Inc., 229-257.
  60. Weber E, Schmid B. 1998. Latitudinal population differentiation in two species of Solidago (Asteraceae) introduced to Europe. American Journal of Botany 85: 1110-1121.
  61. Whitlock MC, McCauley DE. 1990. Some population genetic consequences of colony formation and extinction: genetic correlations within founding groups. Evolution 44: 1717-1724.
  62. Whitlock MC, McCauley DE. 1999. Indirect measures of gene flow and migration: FST ≠ 1/(4Nm + 1). Heredity 82: 117-125.
  63. Williams JL, Auge H, Maron JL. 2008. Different gardens, different results: native and introduced populations exhibit contrasting phenotypes across common gardens. Oecologia 157: 239-248.
  64. Wolfe LM, Elzinga JA, Biere A. 2004. Increased susceptibility to enemies following introduction in the invasive plant Silene latifolia. Ecology Letters 7: 813-820.
Article Info
Journal
The New phytologist
Abbr.
New Phytol
ISSN
1469-8137
Published
2009-08-00
Epub
2009-00-15
Pages
678-690
Language
English
Region
England
NLM ID
9882884
Subset
IM
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com