Home LiteratureArticle Details
PMID: 19223577 Published · ppublish English Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Ductal lavage is an inefficient method of biomarker measurement in high-risk women.

Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) ·Vol. 2 ·No. 3 ·2009-03-00 ·Pages 265-73

Khan SA, Lankes HA, Patil DB, Bryk M, Hou N, Ivancic D, Nayar R, Masood S, Rademaker A

Abstract

Effective methods of serial epithelial sampling to measure breast-specific biomarkers will aid the rapid evaluation of new preventive interventions. We report here a proof-of-principle phase 2 study to assess the utility of ductal lavage (DL) to measure biomarkers of tamoxifen action. We enrolled women with a 5-year breast cancer risk estimate >1.6% or the unaffected breast of women with T1a or T1b breast cancer. After entry DL, participants chose tamoxifen or observation and underwent repeat DL 6 months later. Samples were processed for cytology and immunohistochemistry for estrogen receptor alpha, Ki-67, and cyclooxygenase-2. Of 182 women recruited, 115 (63%) underwent entry and repeat DL; 85 (47%) had sufficient cells for analysis from > or =1 duct at both time points; in 78 (43%), cells were sufficient from > or =1 matched ducts. Forty-six women chose observation and 39 chose tamoxifen. We observed greater reductions in the tamoxifen group than in the observation group for Ki-67 (adjusted P = 0.03) and estrogen receptor alpha (adjusted P = 0.07), but not in cyclooxygenase-2 (adjusted P = 0.4) labeling. Cytologic findings showed a trend toward improvement in the tamoxifen group compared with the observation group. Interobserver variability for cytologic diagnosis between two observers showed good agreement (kappa = 0.44). Using DL, we observed the expected changes in tamoxifen-related biomarkers; however, poor reproducibility of biomarkers in the observation group, the 53% attrition rate of subjects from recruitment to biomarker analyses, and the expense of DL are significant barriers to the use of this procedure for biomarker assessment over time.

MeSH Terms
Adult Biomarkers/analysis,blood Biomarkers, Tumor/biosynthesis Breast Neoplasms/blood,diagnosis Cytological Techniques Female Humans Immunohistochemistry/methods Middle Aged Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control Observer Variation Risk Tamoxifen/therapeutic use Therapeutic Irrigation Treatment Outcome
Chemicals
Biomarkers Biomarkers, Tumor Tamoxifen
Authors & Affiliations
9 authors, click to expand affiliations / ORCID
Khan Seema A
Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 303 East Superior Street, Lurie 4-133, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA. skhan@nmh.org
Lankes Heather A
Patil Deepa B
Bryk Michele
Hou Nanjiang
Ivancic David
Nayar Ritu
Masood Shahla
Rademaker Alfred
References (24)
24 references, click to expand
  1. The reliability of nipple aspirate and ductal lavage in women at increased risk for breast cancer--a potential tool for breast cancer risk assessment and biomarker evaluation.
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 May;16(5):950-5 PMID: 17507621
  2. Treatment and prevention of intraepithelial neoplasia: an important target for accelerated new agent development.
    Clin Cancer Res. 2002 Feb;8(2):314-46 PMID: 11839647
  3. Ductal lavage findings in women with known breast cancer undergoing mastectomy.
    J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Oct 20;96(20):1510-7 PMID: 15494601
  4. Incorporation of clustering effects for the Wilcoxon rank sum test: a large-sample approach.
    Biometrics. 2003 Dec;59(4):1089-98 PMID: 14969489
  5. Reduction in proliferation with six months of letrozole in women on hormone replacement therapy.
    Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007 Nov;106(1):75-84 PMID: 17221152
  6. Estrogen receptor expression in benign breast epithelium and breast cancer risk.
    J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 Jan 7;90(1):37-42 PMID: 9428781
  7. Comparison of cytomorphology in specimens obtained by random periareolar fine needle aspiration and ductal lavage from women at high risk for development of breast cancer.
    Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006 May;97(2):191-7 PMID: 16322885
  8. Papanicolaou staining--a review.
    Microsc Acta. 1983 May;87(3):233-43 PMID: 6195507
  9. Ductal lavage findings in women with mammographic microcalcifications undergoing biopsy.
    Ann Surg Oncol. 2005 Sep;12(9):689-96 PMID: 16052275
  10. Comparison of ductal lavage and random periareolar fine needle aspiration as tissue acquisition methods in early breast cancer prevention trials.
    Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Aug 15;13(16):4943-8 PMID: 17699874
  11. Influence of menstrual cycle, parity and oral contraceptive use on steroid hormone receptors in normal breast.
    Br J Cancer. 1992 Apr;65(4):601-7 PMID: 1562470
  12. Atypia and Ki-67 expression from ductal lavage in women at different risk for breast cancer.
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Jul;15(7):1311-5 PMID: 16835329
  13. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually.
    J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989 Dec 20;81(24):1879-86 PMID: 2593165
  14. Autosomal dominant inheritance of early-onset breast cancer. Implications for risk prediction.
    Cancer. 1994 Feb 1;73(3):643-51 PMID: 8299086
  15. A phase II breast cancer chemoprevention trial of oral alpha-difluoromethylornithine: breast tissue, imaging, and serum and urine biomarkers.
    Clin Cancer Res. 2002 Oct;8(10):3105-17 PMID: 12374678
  16. The importance of cytologic intrarater and interrater reproducibility: the case of ductal lavage.
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Dec;15(12):2553-6 PMID: 17164385
  17. Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study.
    J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 Sep 16;90(18):1371-88 PMID: 9747868
  18. Oral contraceptive (OCP) use increases proliferation and decreases oestrogen receptor content of epithelial cells in the normal human breast.
    Int J Cancer. 1991 May 10;48(2):206-10 PMID: 2019467
  19. Ductal lavage in patients undergoing mastectomy for mammary carcinoma: a correlative study.
    Cancer. 2003 Nov 15;98(10):2170-6 PMID: 14601086
  20. Ki-67 expression in benign breast ductal cells obtained by random periareolar fine needle aspiration.
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Apr;14(4):786-9 PMID: 15824144
  21. Short-term breast cancer prediction by random periareolar fine-needle aspiration cytology and the Gail risk model.
    J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Aug 2;92(15):1217-27 PMID: 10922407
  22. Endocrine biomarkers in ductal lavage samples from women at high risk for breast cancer.
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Nov;14(11 Pt 1):2620-7 PMID: 16284387
  23. Expression of the estrogen receptor gene in developing and adult human breast.
    Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1996;37(3):243-51 PMID: 8825136
  24. Methods for comparing event rates in intervention studies when the unit of allocation is a cluster.
    Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Aug 1;140(3):279-89; discussion 300-1 PMID: 8030631
Article Info
Journal
Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)
Abbr.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila)
ISSN
1940-6215
Published
2009-03-00
Epub
2009-00-17
Pages
265-73
Language
English
Region
United States
NLM ID
101479409
PMCID
PMC2728458
Subset
IM
Grants
NCI NIH HHS · P50 CA089018 · United States
NCI NIH HHS · P50 CA089018-02 · United States
NCI NIH HHS · R25 CA100600 · United States
NCI NIH HHS · P50 CA89018-02 · United States
Analysis Services
Analysis Services

Contact

No. 2 Wenbo Road, Zhangqiu District, Jinan, Shandong

Qilu Normal University · Genelibs Bioinformatics Lab

750 Shunhua Rd, Jinan

2F, Bldg F, University Science Park

Tel: 0531-88819269

WeChat Official Account

Follow our WeChat subscription account for real-time updates and the latest in medical and biological research.


Business Email

E-mail: product@genelibs.com